Skip to main content

A Maximum Likelihood Approach to Inference Under Coarse Data Based on Minimax Regret

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 832))

Abstract

Various methods have been proposed to express and solve maximum likelihood problems with incomplete data. In some of these approaches, the idea is that incompleteness makes the likelihood function imprecise. Two proposals can be found to cope with this situation: maximize the maximal likelihood induced by precise datasets compatible with the incomplete observations, or maximize the minimal such likelihood. These approaches prove to be extremist, the maximax approach having a tendency to disambiguate the data, while the maximin approach favors uniform distributions. In this paper we propose an alternative approach consisting in minimax relative regret criterion with respect to maximal likelihood solutions obtained for all precise datasets compatible with the coarse data. It uses relative likelihood and seems to achieve a trade-off between the maximax and the maximin methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://www.gnu.org/software/octave/.

References

  1. Couso, I., Dubois, D.: A general framework for maximizing likelihood under incomplete data. Int. J. Approx. Reason. 93, 238–260 (2018)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Dempster, A.P.: Upper and lower probabilities induced by a multivalued mapping. Ann. Math. Stat. 38, 325–339 (1967)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Edwards, A.W.F.: Likelihood. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1972)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Heitjan, D.F., Rubin, D.B.: Ignorability and coarse data. Ann. Stat. 19, 2244–2253 (1991)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Hüllermeier, E.: Learning from imprecise and fuzzy observations: data disambiguation through generalized loss minimization. Int. J. Approx. Reason. 55, 1519–1534 (2014)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Guillaume, R., Dubois, D.: Robust parameter estimation of density functions under fuzzy interval observations. In: 9th ISIPTA Symposium, Pescara, Italy, pp. 147–156 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Guillaume, R., Couso, I., Dubois, D.: Maximum likelihood with coarse data based on robust optimisation. In: 10th ISIPTA Symposium, Lugano, Switzerland, pp. 169–180 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Shafer, G.: A Mathematical Theory of Evidence. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1976)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Smets, P.: Constructing the pignistic probability function in a context of uncertainty. In: Henrion, M., et al., (eds.) Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, North-Holland, Amsterdam, vol. 5, pp. 29–39 (1990)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Didier Dubois .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Guillaume, R., Dubois, D. (2019). A Maximum Likelihood Approach to Inference Under Coarse Data Based on Minimax Regret. In: Destercke, S., Denoeux, T., Gil, M., Grzegorzewski, P., Hryniewicz, O. (eds) Uncertainty Modelling in Data Science. SMPS 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 832. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97547-4_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics