Abstract
Production preparation process is one of most important tool which is using during design or redesign of the production process. Production process can be changed by different causes. 3P (production preparation process) is universal tool which can be used in almost all cases of process modernization. 3P is connecting and engaging not only R&D department but also others company departments. The main aim of this research was to identify and assess the risk for potential failures during process implementation using Production Process Preparation (3P). The research was carried out in an enterprise from the automotive industry, which is an international supplier of components to many car brands. The prepared questionnaire contained questions (ordered in the individual categories) selected on the basis of the authors experience and consultations with the experts at least 10 years of experience. The study took into account the seniority of experts as a process engineer and experience as a manager. The results of the surveys were the basis for identifying potential failures with the highest risk in the Production Process Preparation.
Keywords
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Mascitelli, R.: Lean Design Guidebook - Everything Your Product Development Team Needs to Slash Manufacturing Costs, 1st edn., pp. 189–205. Technology Perspectives, Northridge (2004)
Bicheno, J., Holweg, M.: The Lean Toolbox: A handbook for Lean Transformation, 5th edn., pp. 191–193. PICSIE Books, Buckingham (2016)
https://peterpaul.com/capabilities/process-methods/3-p-process. Accessed 21 Mar 2018
https://www.slideshare.net/opexcreative/3-p-production-preparation-process. Accessed 21 Mar 2018
Broniewska, G.: Cykl PDCA odzwierciedleniem klasycznego cyklu zorganizowanego działania (eng. The PDCA cycle reflects the classical cycle of organized activity). Probl. Jakościowe 39(7), 36–39 (2007)
Wysocki, R.: Efektywne zarządzanie projektami (eng. Effective Project Management), 6th edn., p. 54. HELION, Gliwice
Dudek-Burlikowska, M., Szewieczek, D.: The Poka-Yoke method as an improving quality tool of operations in the process. J. Achiev. Mater. Manuf. Eng. 36(1), 95–102 (2009)
Antosz, K., Kużdżał, E.: Doskonalenie procesu przezbrajania maszyn montażowych z wykorzystaniem metody SMED (eng. Improving the retooling process of assembly machines using the SMED method). Technol. Automat. Montażu 1, 49–53 (2015)
Braaksma, A.J.J.: A quantitative method for failure mode and effects analysis. Int. J. Prod. Res. 50, 6904–6917 (2012)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Błocisz, R., Hadas, L. (2019). Risk Assessment for Potential Failures During Process Implementation Using Production Process Preparation. In: Burduk, A., Chlebus, E., Nowakowski, T., Tubis, A. (eds) Intelligent Systems in Production Engineering and Maintenance. ISPEM 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 835. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97490-3_28
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97490-3_28
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-97489-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-97490-3
eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsIntelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)