Skip to main content

Analysis of Practice and Teacher PCK: Inferences from Professional Development Research

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Advances in STEM Education ((ASTEME))

Abstract

In this chapter, we describe an approach to professional development grounded in a model of PCK that centers around a teacher’s knowledge of how to elicit and respond to student thinking, to engage students in the practices of science, and to develop coherent and effective learning experiences. This approach has been shown to be effective in increasing PCK in both in-service professional development and pre-service teacher education contexts and has resulted in increased student achievement when compared to more traditional approaches. Current and future directions for this work include examining the pathways between teacher professional knowledge and student learning, further development of our approach to measuring PCK using automated analysis of teacher writing, and exploring how to effectively scale up this somewhat resource-intensive approach to teacher learning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abell, S. A. (2008). Twenty years later: Does pedagogical content knowledge remain a useful idea? International Journal of Science Education, 30(10), 1405–1416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertram, A. (2014). CoRes and PaP-eRs as a strategy for helping beginning primary teacher develop their pedagogical content knowledge. Educación Química, 25(3), 292–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borko, H., & Livingston, C. (1989). Cognition and improvisation: Differences in mathematics instruction by expert and novice teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 26(4), 473–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, J., Stokes, L., Helms, J., Gess-Newsome, J., & Gardner, A. (2015). The PCK Summit: A process and structure for challenging current ideas, provoking future work, and considering new directions. In A. Berry, P. Friedrichsen, & J. Loughran (Eds.), Re-examining pedagogical content knowledge in science education (pp. 14–27). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cochran, K., DeRuiter, J., & King, R. (1993). Pedagogical content knowing: An integrative model for teacher preparation. Journal of Teacher Education, 44(4), 263–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, A. (2006). Cognitive apprenticeship. In R. Keith Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daehler, K. R., Heller, J. I., & Wang, N. (2015). Supporting growth of pedagogical content knowledge in science. In A. Berry, P. Friedrichsen, & J. Loughran (Eds.), Re-examining pedagogical content knowledge in science education (pp. 45–59). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedrichesen, P., Lannin, J., & Sickel, A. (2012). PCK development among science teachers. Retrieved from http://pcksummit.bscs.org/sites/default/files/Friedrichsen_EP.pdf.

  • Gess-Newsome, J. (1999). Secondary teachers’ knowledge and beliefs about subject matter and its impact on instruction. In J. Gess-Newsome & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge: The construct and its implications for science education (pp. 51–94). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gess-Newsome, J. (2015). A model of teacher professional knowledge and skill including PCK. In A. Berry, P. Friedrichsen, & J. Loughran (Eds.), Re-examining pedagogical content knowledge in science education (pp. 28–42). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gess-Newsome, J., Taylor, J. A., Carlson, J., Gardner, A. L., Wilson, C. D., & Stuhlsatz, M. A. M. (2017). Teacher pedagogical content knowledge, practice, and student achievement. International Journal of Science Education, 1–20. Published online at https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1265158.

  • Grossman, P. L. (1990). The making of a teacher: Teacher knowledge and teacher education. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hashweh, M. Z. (1987). Effects of subject matter knowledge in the teaching of biology and physics. Teaching and Teacher Education, 3(2), 109–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heller, J. I., Daehler, K. R., & Kaskowitz, S. R. (2004, April). Fostering pedagogical content knowledge about electric circuits through case-based professional development. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Vancouver.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hume, A. (2010, May). CoRes as tools for promoting pedagogical content knowledge of novice science teachers. Chemistry Education in New Zealand, 13–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kind, V. (2009). Pedagogical content knowledge in science education: Perspectives and potential for progress. Studies in Science Education, 45(2), 169–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirschner, S., Borowski, A., & Fischer, H. (2012). Development of a valid and reliable test to assess physics teachers’ professional knowledge. Retrieved from http://pcksummit.bscs.org/sites/default/files/Fischer%20EP.pdf.

  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1999). Learning and pedagogy in communities of practice. In J. Leach & B. Moon (Eds.), Learners and pedagogy (pp. 21–33). London: Paul Chapman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loughran, J., Brown, J., & Doecke, B. (2001). Continuities and discontinuities: The transition from pre-service to first-year teaching. Teachers and Teaching, 7(1), 7–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loughran, J., Berry, A., & Mulhall, P. (2012). Portraying PCK. In Understanding and developing science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge (pp. 15–23). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Magnusson, S., Krajcik, J., & Borko, H. (1999). Nature, sources, and development of pedagogical content knowledge for science teaching. In J. Gess-Newsome & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge: The construct and its implications for science education (pp. 95–132). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council. (2013). Monitoring progress toward successful K-12 STEM education: A nation advancing? Committee on the Evaluation Framework for Successful K-12 STEM Education. Board on Science Education and Board on Testing and Assessment, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Padilla, K., Ponce-de-León, A. M., Rembado, F. M., & Garritz, A. (2008). Undergraduate professors' pedagogical content knowledge: The case of 'amount of substance. International Journal of Science Education, 30(10), 1389–1404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, S., & Oliver, J. S. (2008). Revisiting the conceptualisation of pedagogical content knowledge (PCK): PCK as a conceptual tool to understand teachers as professionals. Research in Science Education, 38(3), 261–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rollnick, M., & Mavhunga, E. (2012). Mixed-methods investigation of physical science teachers’ PCK. Retrieved from http://pcksummit.bscs.org/sites/default/files/Rollnick.EP__0.pdf.

  • Rollnick, M., Bennett, J., Rhemtula, M., Dharsey, N., & Ndlovu, T. (2008). The place of subject matter knowledge in pedagogical content knowledge: A case study of South African teachers teaching the amount of substance and chemical equilibrium. International Journal of Science Education, 30(10), 1365–1387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roth, K. J., Garnier, H., Chen, C., Lemmens, M., Schwille, K., & Wickler, N. I. Z. (2011). Videobased lesson analysis: Effective science PD for teacher and student learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(2), 117–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, R. M., & Plasman, K. (2011). Science teacher learning progressions: A review of science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge development. Review of Educational Research, 81(4), 530–565.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L. S. (2002). Truth and consequences? Inquiry and policy in research on teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 53(3), 248–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L. S. (2015). PCK: Its genesis and exodus. In A. Berry, P. Friedrichsen, & J. Loughran (Eds.), Re-examining pedagogical content knowledge in science education (pp. 28–42). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, S., & Banilower, E. (2012). Challenges of developing PCK measures for large-scale studies. Retrieved from http://pcksummit.bscs.org/sites/default/files/Smith%20Banilower%20EP.pdf.

  • Smith, P. S., & Banilower, E. R. (2015). A new application of the uncertainty principle. In A. Berry, P. Friedrichsen, & J. Loughran (Eds.), Re-examining pedagogical content knowledge in science education (pp. 28–42). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, J. A., Roth, K., Wilson, C. D., Stuhlsatz, M. A., & Tipton, E. (2016). The effect of an analysis-of-practice, videocase-based, teacher professional development program on elementary students’ science achievement. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 10(2), 241–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Driel, J., & Henze, I. (2012). Development of PCK among pre-service and in-service science teachers. Retrieved from http://pcksummit.bscs.org/sites/default/files/VanDriel.EP_.pdf.

  • Van Driel, J. H., Verloop, N., & de Vos, W. (1998). Developing science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(6), 673–695.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • William, D. (2010). What counts as evidence of educational achievement? The role of constructs in the pursuit of equity in assessment. Review of Research in Education, 34, 254–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J. (2012). Using CoRes to develop the pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) of early career science and technology teachers. Journal of Technology Education, 24(1), 34–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, C., Stuhlsatz, M., Hvidsten, C., & Stennett, B. (2017, April). Examining the impact of lesson-analysis based teacher education across methods courses, student teaching, and induction. Paper presented at the annual meeting of NARST, San Antonio, TX.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Wilson, C.D., Stuhlsatz, M., Hvidsten, C., Gardner, A. (2018). Analysis of Practice and Teacher PCK: Inferences from Professional Development Research. In: Uzzo, S., Graves, S., Shay, E., Harford, M., Thompson, R. (eds) Pedagogical Content Knowledge in STEM. Advances in STEM Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97475-0_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97475-0_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-97474-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-97475-0

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics