Abstract
In recent years, scholars of organizations and management have embraced the “material turn” in the social sciences (Boxenbaum et al. 2018; Leonardi et al. 2012; Carlile et al. 2013a, b; de Vaujany and Mitev 2013; Robichaud and Cooren 2013). The material turn seeks to investigate and theorize the unique roles that materiality, including bodies, artifacts and technologies, plays in social and organizational dynamics, such as their enabling and constraining influences on a variety of organizational phenomena. The attention to materiality is adding a novel and exciting layer of analysis to scholarship in organization and management theory, which—like the social science more broadly—has been dominated by cognitive and verbal perspectives for several decades (Barad 2003; De Vaujany and Mitev 2015). The integration of materiality is helping to shed light on many organizational and managerial phenomena that were previously neglected because our theories and methods were ill-equipped to capture them. In recent years, several branches of organization and management theory have started to engage with the material turn. Some scholarly communities were created around a shared interest in formulating theoretical accounts and developing empirical methods to decipher how materiality interacts with cognition, discourse and/or behavior in organizational dynamics (Carlile et al. 2013b; de Vaujany et al. 2014; Leonardi et al. 2012; de Vaujany and Mitev 2013).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Abdelnour, S., Hasselbladh, H., & Kallinikos, J. (2017). Agency and institutions in organization studies. Organization Studies, 38(12), 1775–1792.
Amaeshi, K., & Amao, O. O. (2009). Corporate social responsibility in transnational spaces: Exploring influences of varieties of capitalism on expressions of corporate codes of conduct in Nigeria. Journal of Business Ethics, 86(2), 225.
Bachelard, G. (1938). La formation de l’esprit scientifique. Paris: Vrin.
Bachmann, R., Gillespie, N., & Priem, R. (2015). Repairing trust in organizations and institutions: Toward a conceptual framework. Organization Studies, 36(9), 1123–1142.
Barad, K. (2003). Posthumanist performativity: Toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 28(3), 801–831.
Barley, S. R., & Tolbert, P. S. (1997). Institutionalization and structuration: Studying the links between action and institution. Organization Studies, 18(1), 93–117.
Battilana, J. (2006). Agency and institutions: The enabling role of individuals’ social position. Organization, 13(5), 653–676.
Battilana, J., Leca, B., & Boxenbaum, E. (2009). 2 how actors change institutions: Towards a theory of institutional entrepreneurship. Academy of Management Annals, 3(1), 65–107.
Berger, P., & Luckmann, T. (1967). The social construction of reality. New York: Anchor.
Binder, A. (2007). For love and money: Organizations’ creative responses to multiple environmental logics. Theory and Society, 36(6), 547–571.
Blanc, A., & Huault, I. (2014). Against the digital revolution? Institutional maintenance and artifacts within the French recorded music industry. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 83, 10–23.
Boisot, M. (2013). Information Space (RLE: Organizations) (Vol. 2). Abingdon: Routledge.
Boxenbaum, E., Huault, I., & Leca, B. (2016). Le tournant “materiel” dans la theorie neoinstitutionnaliste. In F.-X. de Vaujany, A. Hussenot et J.-F. Chanlat (Eds.), Théories des organisations: Nouveaux tournants (pp. 227–238). Paris: Economica.
Boxenbaum, E., Jones, C., Meyer, R., & Svejenova, S. (2018). Towards an articulation of the material and visual turn in organization studies. Organization Studies, 39(5/6): 597–616.
Carlile, P. R., Nicolini, D., Langley, A., & Tsoukas, H. (2013a). How matter matters: Objects, artifacts and materiality in organization studies: Introducing the third volume of “perspective on organization studies”. In P. R. Carlile, D. Nicolini, A. Langley, & H. Tsoukas (Eds.), How matter matters: Objects, artifacts and materiality in organization studies (pp. 1–15). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Carlile, P. R., Nicolini, D., Langley, A., & Tsoukas, H. (2013b). How matter matters: Objects, artifacts, and materiality in organization studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Castor, T. (2016). The materiality of discourse: Relational positioning in a fresh water controversy. Communication Research and Practice, 2(3), 334–350.
Cooren, F., Fairhurst, G., & Huët, R. (2012). Why matter always matters in (organizational) communication. In P. M. Leonardi, B. A. Nardi, & J. Kallinikos (Eds.), Materiality and organizing: Social interaction in a technological world (pp. 296–314). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Czarniawska, B. (2004). On time, space, and action nets. Organization, 11(6), 773–791.
Czarniawska, B. (2009). Emerging institutions: Pyramids or anthills? Organization Studies, 30(4), 423–441.
Czarniawska, B. (2010). Women, the city and (dis) organizing. Culture and Organization, 16(3), 283–300.
Dacin, M. T., Munir, K., & Tracey, P. (2010). Formal dining at Cambridge colleges: Linking ritual performance and institutional maintenance. Academy of Management Journal, 53(6), 1393–1418.
David, R. J., & Bitektine, A. B. (2009). The deinstitutionalization of institutional theory? Exploring divergent agendas in institutional research. InThe SAGE handbook of organizational research methods (pp. 160–175). Los Angeles: Sage.
de Vaujany, F.-X., & Mitev, N. (2013). Materiality and space: Organizations, artifacts and practices. London: Springer.
de Vaujany, F.-X., & Mitev, N. (2015). Introduction au tournant matériel en théories des organisations: Economica.
de Vaujany, F.-X., & Vaast, E. (2016). Matters of visuality in legitimation practices: Dual iconographies in a meeting room. Organization, 23(5), 763–790.
de Vaujany, F.-X., Mitev, N., Laniray, P., & Vaast, E. (2014). Materiality and time: Historical perspectives on organizations, artifacts and practices. London: Springer.
Delacour, H., & Leca, B. (2017). The paradox of controversial innovation: Insights from the rise of impressionism. Organization Studies, 38(5), 597–618.
DiMaggio, P. (1988). Interest and agency in institutional theory. In L. Zucker (Ed.), Institutional patterns and organizations (pp. 3–21). Cambridge, MA: Ballinger Publishing Co.
DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160.
DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1991). The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (Vol. 17). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Dover, G., & Lawrence, T. B. (2010). A gap year for institutional theory: Integrating the study of institutional work and participatory action research. Journal of Management Inquiry, 19(4), 305–316.
Edwards, T. J. 2016. Institutional theory: reflections on ontology. In: Mir, R., Willmott, H. and Greenwood, M. eds. Routledge Handbook of Philosophy in Organization Sciences (pp.1–26). Routledge Companions in Business, Management and Accounting. London: Routledge.
Edwards. (Forthcoming).
Faraj, S., & Azad, B. (2012). The materiality of technology: An affordance perspective. In P. M. Leonardi, B. A. Nardi, & J. Kallinikos (Eds.), Materiality and organizing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Frank, D. J., & Meyer, J. W. (2002). The profusion of individual roles and identities in the postwar period. Sociological Theory, 20(1), 86–105.
Friedland, R. (2012). The institutional logics perspective: A new approach to culture, structure, and process. M@n@gement, 15(5), 583–595.
Friedland, R., & Alford, R. R. (1991). Bringing society back in: Symbols, practices and institutional contradictions. In W.W. Powell & P. J. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 232–263). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Gawer, A., & Phillips, N. (2013). Institutional work as logics shift: The case of Intel’s transformation to platform leader. Organization Studies, 34(8), 1035–1071.
Giddens, A. (1984). The constitutions of society: Outline of the theory of structure. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Granqvist, N., & Gustafsson, R. (2016). Temporal institutional work. Academy of Management Journal, 59(3), 1009–1035.
Greenwood, R., Oliver, C., Sahlin, K., & Suddaby, R. (2008). Introduction. In SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 1–46). London: Sage.
Greenwood, R., Oliver, C., Lawrence, T. B., & Meyer, R. E. (2017). Introduction: Into the fourth decade. In SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism (2nd ed., pp. 1–23). London: Sage.
Grosz, E. A. (1995). Space, time, and perversion: Essays on the politics of bodies. St Leonards: Allen & Unwin.
Hardy, C., Phillips, N., & Lawrence, T. B. (2003). Resources, knowledge and influence: The organizational effects of interorganizational collaboration. Journal of Management Studies, 40(2), 321–347.
Hargadon, A. B., & Douglas, Y. (2001). When innovations meet institutions: Edison and the design of the electric light. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46(3), 476–501.
Höllerer, M. A., Daudigeos, T., & Jancsary, D. (2018). Multimodality, meaning, and institutions: Editorial. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 54A, 1–24.
Huault, I., Boxenbaum, E., & Leca, B. (2015). Le tournant “matériel” dans la théorie néo-institutionnaliste. In F.-X. De Vaujany, A. Hussenot, & J.-F. Chanlat (Eds.), Théories des organisations—Nouveaux tournants (pp. 227–238). Paris: Economica.
Ingold, T. (2011). Being alive: Essays on movement, knowledge and description. London: Taylor & Francis.
Jancsary, D., Höllerer, M. A., & Meyer, R. E. (2016). Critical analysis of visual and multimodal texts. In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse studies (3rd ed., pp. 180–204). Los Angeles: Sage.
Jones, M. (2013). Untangling sociomateriality. In P. R. Carlile, D. Nicolini, A. Langley, & H. Tsoukas (Eds.), How matter matters (Vol. 3, pp. 197–226). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Jones, C., & Massa, F. G. (2013). From novel practice to consecrated exemplar: Unity Temple as a case of institutional evangelizing. Organization Studies, 34(8), 1099–1136.
Jones, C., Boxenbaum, E., & Anthony, C. (2013). The immateriality of material practices in institutional logics. In E. Boenbaum & M. Lounsbury (Eds.), Institutional logics in action, Part A (pp. 51–75). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Jones, C., Meyer, R. E., Jancsary, D., & Höllerer, M. A. (2017). The material and visual basis of institutions. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, T. B. Lawrence, & R. E. Meyer (Eds.), SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism (2nd ed., pp. 621–646). London: Sage.
Jourdan, J., Durand, R., & Thornton, P. H. (2017). The price of admission: Organizational deference as strategic behavior. American Journal of Sociology, 123(1), 232–275.
Kornberger, M., & Clegg, S. R. (2004). Bringing space back in: Organizing the generative building. Organization Studies, 25(7), 1095–1114.
Lanzara, G. F., & Patriotta, G. (2007). The institutionalization of knowledge in an automotive factory: Templates, inscriptions, and the problem of durability. Organization Studies, 28(5), 635–660.
Lawrence, T. B., & Dover, G. (2015). Place and institutional work creating housing for the hard-to-house. Administrative Science Quarterly, 60(3), 371–410.
Lawrence, T. B., & Suddaby, R. (2006). 1.6 institutions and institutional work. In The Sage handbook of organization studies (Vol. 2, pp. 215–254). London: Sage.
Lawrence, T. B., Leca, B., & Zilber, T. B. (2013). Institutional work: Current research, new directions and overlooked issues. Organization Studies, 34(8), 1023–1033.
Lefebvre, H., & Nicholson-Smith, D. (1991). The production of space (Vol. 142). Oxford: Blackwell.
Leonardi, P. M. (2010). Digital materiality? How artifacts without matter, matter. First Monday, 15(6).
Leonardi, P. M. (2013). The emergence of materiality within formal organizations. In P. R. Carlile, D. Nicolini, A. Langley, & H. Tsoukas (Eds.), How matter matters: Objects, artifacts and materiality in organization studies (Vol. 3, pp. 142–170). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Leonardi, P. M., Nardi, B. A., & Kallinikos, J. (2012). Materiality and organizing: Social interaction in a technological world. Oxford: Oxford University Press on Demand.
Mäkitalo, Å. (2012). Professional learning and the materiality of social practice. Journal of Education and Work, 25(1), 59–78.
Martí, I., & Fernández, P. (2013). The institutional work of oppression and resistance: Learning from the Holocaust. Organization Studies, 34(8), 1195–1223.
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1964). Le visible et l’invisible: suivi de notes de travail (Vol. 36). Paris: Gallimard.
Merleau-Ponty, M. (2003). L’institution, la passivité. Paris: Belin.
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1945/2013). Phénoménologie de la perception. France: Gallimard.
Merton, R. K. (1938). Social structure and anomie. American Sociological Review, 3(5), 672–682.
Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. The American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363.
Meyer, R., Jancsary, D., Höllerer, M., & Boxenbaum, E. (2018). The role of verbal and visual text in the process of institutionalization. Academy of Management Review. 43(3), 1–27.
Miettinen, R., & Virkkunen, J. (2005). Epistemic objects, artifacts and organizational change. Organization, 12(3), 437–456.
Monteiro, P., & Nicolini, D. (2015). Recovering materiality in institutional work: Prizes as an assemblage of human and material entities. Journal of Management Inquiry, 24(1), 61–81. https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492614546221.
Morgan, G., & Smircich, L. (1980). The case for qualitative research. Academy of Management Review, 5(4), 491–500.
Ocasio, W. (1997). Towards an attention-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 18, 187–206.
Orlikowski, W. J. (2007). Sociomaterial practices: Exploring technology at work. Organization Studies, 28(9), 1435–1448. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840607081138.
Orlikowski, W. J., & Barley, S. R. (2001). Technology and institutions: What can research on information technology and research on organizations learn from each other? MIS Quarterly, 25(2), 145–165.
Orlitzky, M. (2011). Institutionalized dualism: Statistical significance testing as myth and ceremony. Journal of Management Control, 22(1), 47.
Patriotta, G., Gond, J. P., & Schultz, F. (2011). Controversies, orders of worth, and public justifications. Journal of Management Studies, 48(8), 1804–1836.
Petrakaki, D., Klecun, E., & Cornford, T. (2016). Changes in healthcare professional work afforded by technology: The introduction of a national electronic patient record in an English hospital. Organization, 23(2), 206–226.
Phillips, N., Lawrence, T. B., & Hardy, C. (2004). Discourse and institutions. Academy of Management Review, 29(4), 635–652.
Pinch, T. (2008). Technology and institutions: Living in a material world. Theory and Society, 37(5), 461–483.
Pittz, T. G., Boje, D. M., Intindola, M. L., & Nicholson, S. (2017). ‘COPE’ing with institutional pressures: A reintroduction of pragmatism to the study of organisations. International Journal of Management Concepts and Philosophy, 10(2), 113–129.
Puyou, F.-R., & Quattrone, P. (2018). The visual and material dimensions of legitimacy: Accounting and the search for socie-ties. Organization Studies, 39, 727–752.
Raaijmakers, A., Vermeulen, P., & Meeus, M. (2018). Children without bruised knees: Responding to material and ideational (mis)alignments. Organization Studies, 39, 817–836.
Raviola, E., & Norbäck, M. (2013). Bringing technology and meaning into institutional work: Making news at an Italian business newspaper. Organization Studies, 34(8), 1171–1194.
Reckwitz, A. (2002). The status of the “material” in theories of culture: From “social structure” to “artifacts”. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 32(2), 195–217.
Reay, T., & Jones, C. (2016). Qualitatively capturing institutional logics. Strategic Organization, 14(4), 441–454.
Reinecke, J., & Ansari, S. (2015). When times collide: Temporal brokerage at the intersection of markets and developments. Academy of Management Journal, 58(2), 618–648.
Robey, D., Anderson, C., & Raymond, B. (2013). Information technology, materiality, and organizational change: A professional odyssey. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 14(7), 379.
Robichaud, D., & Cooren, F. (Eds.). (2013). Organization and organizing: Materiality, agency and discourse. New York: Routledge.
Rowland, N. J., & Rojas, F. (2006). Bringing technology back in: A critique of the institutionalist perspective on museums. Museum and Society, 4(2), 84–95.
Schatzki, T. R. (2010). The timespace of human activity: On performance, society, and history as indeterminate teleological events. Lanham: Lexington Books.
Smets, M., Morris, T. I. M., & Greenwood, R. (2012). From practice to field: A multilevel model of practice-driven institutional change. Academy of Management Journal, 55(4), 877–904.
Souto-Otero, M., & Beneito-Montagut, R. (2013). ‘Power on’: Googlecracy, privatisation and the standardisation of sources. Journal of Education Policy, 28(4), 481–500.
Souto-Otero, M., & Beneito-Montagut, R. (2016). From governing through data to governmentality through data: artifacts, strategies and the digital turn. European Educational Research Journal, 15(1), 14–33.
Stigliani, I., & Ravasi, D. (2012). Organizing thoughts and connecting brains: Material practices and the transition from individual to group-level prospective sense-making. Academy of Management Journal, 55, 1232–1259.
Stowell, A., & Warren, S. (2018). The institutionalisation of suffering: Embodied inhabitation and the maintenance of health and safety in e-waste recycling. Organization Studies, 39, 791–815.
Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571–610.
Suddaby, R., & Greenwood, R. (2009). Methodological issues in researching institutional change. In D. Buchanan & A. Bryman (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organizational research methods (pp. 177–195). London: Sage.
Swidler, A. (1986). Culture in action: Symbols and strategies. American Sociological Review, 51, 273–286.
Thornton, P. H., & Ocasio, W. (1999). Institutional logics and the historical contingency of power in organizations: Executive succession in the higher education publishing industry, 1958–1990. American Journal of Sociology, 105(3), 801–843.
Thornton, P. H., Ocasio, W., & Lounsbury, M. (2012). The institutional logics perspective: A new approach to culture, structure, and process. Oxford: Oxford University Press on Demand.
Vásquez, C., & Plourde, M. C. (2017). Materiality and organizing. In The international encyclopedia of organizational communication. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
Yakhlef, A. (2009). We have always been virtual: Writing, institutions, and technology! Space and Culture, 12(1), 76–94.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
de Vaujany, FX., Adrot, A., Boxenbaum, E., Leca, B. (2019). Introduction: How Can Materiality Inform Institutional Analysis?. In: de Vaujany, FX., Adrot, A., Boxenbaum, E., Leca, B. (eds) Materiality in Institutions. Technology, Work and Globalization. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97472-9_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97472-9_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-97471-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-97472-9
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)