Abstract
The emergence of digital technologies has impacted not only the nature of museums as institutions, but also the practice of artists. Consequently, artworks which employ digital media (such as video and software) in their access or display are making their way into permanent collections in increasing numbers. These digital media can pose considerable challenges in terms of long-term access and display, due to a changing technological environment and resulting risk of obsolescence. Contemporary art museums are among those leading the way in developing approaches to collecting and caring for these types of object. This accompanies a general shift in conservation theory and practice, from a traditional object-centric approach to one which allows the continued evolution of the work through time. The presence of digital media in collections is also forcing the art museum to look beyond its walls and engage with experts from formerly unfamiliar domains. In this chapter, we will introduce the imperatives driving digital preservation and discuss the state of the art in the field of conserving and preserving digital art . We will then focus on recent research relating to specific digital media types and present a number of case studies from the Tate collection.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Albert K (2018) A victory for software preservation: DMCA exemption granted for SPN. Cyberlaw Clinic. https://clinic.cyber.harvard.edu/2018/10/26/a-victory-for-software-preservation-dmca-exemption-granted-for-spn/. Accessed 21 Jan 2019
Ambacher B, Ashley K, Berry J, Brooks C, Dale RL, Flecker D, Giaretta D, Hamidzadeh B, Johnson K, Jones M (2014) Trustworthy repositories audit and certification: criteria and checklist (TRAC). Center for Research Libraries, Chicago
AIC (1994) Code of ethics and guidelines for practice. American Institute for Conservation of Historic and Artistic Works. http://www.conservation-us.org/docs/default-source/governance/code-of-ethics-and-guidelines-for-practice.pdf?sfvrsn=9. Accessed on 21 Jan 2019
AIC (2017) Inherent vice. AIC Wiki, American institute for conservation of historic and artistic works. http://www.conservation-wiki.com/wiki/Inherent_vice. Accessed on 21 Jan 2019
AIC (n.d.) What is conservation? American Institute for Conservation of Historic and Artistic Works. http://www.conservation-us.org/about-conservation. Accessed 13 July 2018
Arms CR, Fleischhauer C, Murray K (2017) Sustainability of digital formats: planning for library of congress collections. Library of congress. https://www.loc.gov/preservation/digital/formats/. Accessed 21 Jan 2019
Artefactual Systems Inc. (2019) Archivematica: open-source digital preservation system. Archivematica. https://www.archivematica.org/en/. Accessed on 21 Jan 2019
Association of Research Libraries (2018) Code of best practices in fair use for software preservation. Association of research libraries. https://www.arl.org/focus-areas/copyright-ip/fair-use/code-of-best-practices-in-fair-use-for-software-preservation. Accessed on 21 Jan 2019
Atlas C (1971) Joints 4tet Ensemble. Tate, UK. https://www.tate.org.uk/art/artworks/atlas-joints-4tet-ensemble-t13849. Accessed on 19 Mar 2019
BitCurator (n.d.) BitCurator. https://bitcurator.net/bitcurator/. Accessed on 21 Jan 2019
CCSDS (2012) Reference model for an Open Archival Information System (OAIS): Magenta Book (No. CCSDS 650.0-M-2). Washington, DC, USA
Cochrane E, Tilbury J, Stobbe O (2017) Adding emulation functionality to existing digital preservation infrastructure. Presented at the iPRES 2018, Koyoto, Japan
Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems (2017) About CCSDS. CCSDS.org. URL https://public.ccsds.org/about/default.aspx. Accessed on 21 Jan 2019
Craig-Martin M (2003) Becoming. Tate, UK. http://www.tate.org.uk/art/artworks/craig-martin-becoming-t11812. Accessed on 20 Jan 2019
Dappert A, Farquhar A (2009) Significance is in the eye of the stakeholder. In: International conference on theory and practice of digital libraries. Springer, pp 297–308
Day MW (2000) Preservation of electronic information: a bibliography. https://www.webarchive.org.uk/wayback/en/archive/20170705065345/, http://homes.ukoln.ac.uk/~lismd/preservation.html. Accessed on 21 Jan 2019
Dekker A (2018) Collecting and conserving net art: moving beyond conventional methods. Routledge
Depocas A, Ippolito J, Jones C (eds) (2003) Permanence through change: the variable media approach. Guggenheim museum publications and the daniel langlois foundation for art, science, and technology, New York, USA and Montreal, Canada
Digital Preservation Coalition (2015) Digital preservation handbook, 2nd Edn. http://handbook.dpconline.org/. Accessed on 21 June 2017
Dover C (2016) How the Guggenheim and NYU are conserving computer-based art. Guggenheim
Dreher T (2014) History of computer art, 1st Update (Sept 2015). (ed) IASL online, Online
Dublin Core Metadata Initiative (2012) DCMI metadata terms. Dublin core metadata initiative. http://dublincore.org/documents/dcmi-terms/. Accessed on 13 July 2018
Engel D, Phillips J (2018) Introducing ‘Code Resituation’: applying the concept of minimal intervention to the conservation treatment of software-based art. In: Presented at the AIC 46th annual meeting, Houston, TX, USA
Engel D, Wharton G (2014) Reading between the lines: source code documentation as a conservation strategy for software-based art. Stud Conserv 59:404–415. https://doi.org/10.1179/2047058413Y.0000000115
Engel D, Wharton G (2015) Source code analysis as technical art history. J Amer Inst Conserv 54:91–101
Ensom T (2018) Revealing hidden processes: instrumentation and reverse engineering in the conservation of software-based art. In: Presented at the AIC 46th annual meeting, Houston, Texas, USA
Falcão P (2010) Developing a risk assessment tool for the conservation of software-based artworks. MA thesis. Berne, Switzerland
Falcão P, Alistair A, Jones B (2014) Virtualisation as a tool for the conservation of software-based artworks. In: Presented at the iPRES 2014, Melbourne, Australia
Falcão P, Dekker A (2015) Virtualizing John Gerrard’s “Sow Farm” (2009), or not?
Fino-Radin B (2018) Digital art storage: what every conservator needs to know. AIC News 43
Gengenbach M, Peltzman S, Meister S, Graham B, Waugh D, Moran J, Seifert J, Dowding H, Carleton J (2016) OSS4EVA: using open-source tools to fulfill digital preservation requirements. Code4Lib J vol 34
Gerrard (2009) Sow Farm (near Libbey, Oklahoma) 2009. Tate, UK. https://www.tate.org.uk/art/artworks/gerrardsow-farm-near-libbeyoklahoma-2009-t14279. Accessed on 19 March 2019
Gilbert and George (1970) A portrait of the artists as young men. Tate, UK. https://www.tate.org.uk/art/artworks/gilbert-georgea-portrait-of-the-artists-as-youngmen-t01704. Accessed on 19 Mar 2019
Gilbert and George (1972a) In the Bush. Tate, UK. https://www.tate.org.uk/art/artworks/gilbert-georgein-the-bush-t01702. Accessed on 19 Mar 2019
Gilbert and George (1972b) Gordon’s makes us drunk. Tate, UK. https://www.tate.org.uk/art/artworks/gilbert-georgegordons-makes-us-drunk-t01703. Accessed on 19 Mar 2019
Haidvogl M (2015) Acquiring and documenting Jürg Lehni’s “Viktor” (2006). Vimeo. https://vimeo.com/146980154. Accessed on 21 Jan 2019
Higgins C (2016) Saturday interview: Frances Morris. The Guardian, UK
Kenney AR, McGovern NY, Entlich R, Kehoe WR, Olsen E, Buckley E (2003) Digital preservation management workshops and tutorial. digital preservation management: implementing short-term strategies for long-term problems. http://www.dpworkshop.org. Accessed on 20 Jan 2019
Kentridge W (2008) I am not me, the horse is not mine. Tate, UK. http://www.tate.org.uk/art/artworks/kentridge-i-am-not-me-the-horse-is-not-mine-t14213. Accessed on 20 Jan 2019
Kirschenbaum M, Lee CA, Woods K, Chassanoff A et al (2013) From bitstreams to heritage: putting digital forensics into practice in collecting institutions. https://drum.lib.umd.edu/bitstream/handle/1903/14736/bitstreamsto-heritage.pdf. Accessed on 19 Mar 2019
Kreymer I (n.d.) Webrecorder. http://webrecorder.io. Accessed on 16 July 2018
Laurenson P (2013) Old media, new media? significant difference and the conservation of software-based art, In: Preserving and exhibiting media art. Challenges and perspectives. Amsterdam University Press, Amsterdam, pp 73–96
Laurenson P (2006) Authenticity, change and loss in the conservation of time-based media installations. Tate Papers. Tate, UK. https://www.tate.org.uk/research/publications/tate-papers/06/authenticity-change-and-loss-conservation-of-time-based-media-installations. Accessed on 20 Jan 2019
Leckey M (2015) Dream english kid, 1964–1999 AD. Tate, UK. https://www.tate.org.uk/art/artworks/leckey-dream-english-kid-1964-1999-ad-t14666
Library of Congress (n.d.) About—digital preservation (Library of Congress). Library of Congress—digital preservation, USA. http://www.digitalpreservation.gov/about/. Accessed on 23 Jan 2018
Lozano-Hemmer R (2015) Best practices for conservation of media art from an artist’s perspective
Lurk T (2008) Virtualisation as conservation measure. In: Archiving conference. society for imaging science and technology, pp 221–225
Martinat Mendoza JC (2007) Brutalism: stereo reality environment 3. Tate, UK. https://www.tate.org.uk/art/artworks/gilbert-georgegordons-makes-us-drunk-t01703. Accessed on 19 Mar 2019
McDonough JP, Olendorf R, Kirschenbaum M, Kraus K, Reside D, Donahue R, Phelps A, Egert C, Lowood H, Rojo S (2010) Preserving virtual worlds final report. Library of congress, USA
McGovern N (2007) A digital decade: where have we been and where are we going in digital preservation? RLG DigiNews
MediaArea (2017) QCTools. http://mediaarea.net/QCTools. Accessed on 20 Jan 2019
MediaArea (2018) MediaInfo https://mediaarea.net/en/MediaInfo. Accessed on 21 Jan 2019
Mitcham J (2017) How can we preserve Google Documents? Digital archiving, University of York, UK. http://digital-archiving.blogspot.com/2017/04/how-can-we-preserve-google-documents.html. Accessed on 20 Jan 2019
Mundy J (2012) Lost art: Edward Ihnatowicz. Tate, UK. https://www.tate.org.uk/context-comment/articles/gallery-lost-art-edward-inhatowicz. Accessed on 16 July 2018
Muñoz-Viñas S (2012) Contemporary theory of conservation. Routledge
Stefano, PD, Fleischhauer, C, Goethals, A, Kjörling, M, Krabbenhoeft, N, Lacinak, C, Mandelbaum, J, McCarthy, K, Murray, K, Navale, V, Rice, D, Ruggaber, R, Owens, T, Zwaard, K (2014) Checking your digital content. http://www.digitalpreservation.gov/documents/NDSA-Fixity-Guidance-Report-final100214.pdf. Accessed on 19 Mar 2019
Owens T (2018) The theory and craft of digital preservation. Johns Hopkins University Press
Paul C, Mancusi-Ungaro C (2018) Programmed: conserving concepts. The institute of fine arts, New York University. https://vimeo.com/310817190. Accessed on 21 Jan 2019
Phillips J (2007) Reporting iterations: a documentation model for time-based media art. Revista de História da Arte, Perform Documentation Conserv Contemporary Art 4:168–179
Phillips M, Bailey J, Goethals A, Owens T (2013) The NDSA levels of digital preservation: explanation and uses. In: Archiving conference. Society for imaging science and technology, pp 216–222
PREMIS Editorial Committee (2015) PREMIS data dictionary for preservation metadata, version 3.0. OCLC, Washington
Rechert K, Espenschied D, Valizada I, Liebetraut T, Russler N, von Suchodoletz D (2013) An architecture for community-based curation and presentation of complex digital objects. In: Urs SR, Na JC, Buchanan G (eds) Digital libraries: social media and community networks. Lecture notes in computer science, Springer, pp 103–112. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-03599-4_12
Rechert K, Falcão P, Ensom T (2016) Introduction to an emulation-based preservation strategy for software-based artworks
Rice D (2018) Sustaining consistent video presentation. Tate. http://www.tate.org.uk/about-us/projects/pericles/sustaining-consistent-video-presentation. Accessed on 21 Jan 2019
Rosenthal DSH, Robertson T, Lipkis T, Reich V, Morabito S (2005) Requirements for digital preservation systems: a bottom-up approach. D-Lib Magazine 11. https://doi.org/10.1045/november2005-rosenthal
Taylor GD (2014) When the machine made art: the troubled history of computer art. Bloomsbury Publishing USA
van de Vall R, Hölling H, Scholte T, Stigter S (2011) Reflections on a biographical approach to contemporary art conservation. In: Presented at the 16th triennial conference Lisbon, Almada: Critério. DOI: 11245/1.344546
von Suchodoletz D, Rechert K, Valizada I (2013) Towards emulation-as-a-service: cloud services for versatile digital object access. Int J Dig Curation 8:131–142. https://doi.org/10.2218/ijdc.v8i1.250
Wilson A (2007) Significant properties report. InSPECT work package 2.2 No. Version 2
Yeo G (2010) “Nothing is the same as something else”: significant properties and notions of identity and originality. Arch Sci 10:85–116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-010-9119-9
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Falcão, P., Ensom, T. (2019). Conserving Digital Art. In: Giannini, T., Bowen, J. (eds) Museums and Digital Culture. Springer Series on Cultural Computing. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97457-6_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97457-6_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-97456-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-97457-6
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)