Skip to main content

Introduction: what does coming to terms with the past mean?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Representing Communism After the Fall

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Discursive Psychology ((PSDP))

  • 341 Accesses

Abstract

The question ‘what does coming to terms with the past mean?’ is one of the most puzzling questions in the social sciences. For some, like Theodor W. Adorno, the matter of coming to terms with the past is ‘essentially … a matter of the way in which the past is called up and made present: whether one stops at sheer reproach, or whether one endures the horror through a certain strength that comprehends even the incomprehensible’ (1986, p. 126, emphasis in original). For others, it is a matter of justice (Teitel 2000), a process of ‘overcoming the past’ at the heart of political transition (Habermas and Michnik 1994), or accountability based on historical ‘truth’ that paves the way for democratic consolidation (Tismăneanu 2008).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    I showed elsewhere, in my work on extreme prejudice (see Tileagă 2015), how this principle is a sine qua non of a very productive way of analyzing social issues and social problems.

  2. 2.

    So the question then becomes what considerations do people ‘make relevant to their actions, and to other people’s actions’ (cf. Edwards 1997, p. 17). Things like norms, rules of conduct, things that you are supposed to do or say or not supposed to do or say, are, as Edwards put it, ‘grist to the mill for their role as participants’ resources’ (Edwards 1997, p. 18).

  3. 3.

    This does not mean that the analyst does not adhere to a particular (political) version of reality or is uncommitted to a critical agenda—doing discursive psychology does not invite cold distancing from injustice, oppression, prejudice, and similar concerns. Quite the contrary, doing discursive psychology means ‘becoming participants in event construction, offering our own versions of things, choosing amongst accounts … and inevitably to provide further materials for analysis’ (Edwards 1997, p. 16).

  4. 4.

    See Tileagă (2015) for the relevance of ‘social repression’ in the analysis of extreme prejudice against ethnic minorities.

References

  • Adorno, T. W. (1986). What Does Coming to Terms with the Past Mean?. In G. Hartman (Ed.), Bitburg in Moral and Political Perspective (T. Bahti & G. Hartman, Trans.). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andreescu, G. (2013). Carturari, Opozanti si Documente: Manipularea Arhivei Securitatii. Bucuresti: Polirom.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, M. (2007). Shaping History: Narratives of Political Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Arendt, H. (1977). Between Past and Future: Eight Exercises in Political Thought. New York: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett, F. C. (1932/1995). Remembering: A Study in Experimental and Social Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Billig, M. (1999). Freudian Repression. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Billig, M., Condor, S., Edwards, D., Gane, M., Middleton, D., & Radley, A. (1988). Ideological Dilemmas: A Social Psychology of Everyday Thinking. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumer, H. ([1969] 1998). Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brockmeier, J. (2010). After the Archive: Remapping Memory. Culture & Psychology, 16, 5–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S. D. (2012). Two Minutes of Silence: Social Technologies of Public Commemoration. Theory & Psychology, 22, 234–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S. D., & Reavey, P. (2013). Experience and Memory. In E. Keightley & M. Pickering (Eds.), Research Methods for Memory Studies. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S. D., & Reavey, P. (2015). Vital Memory and Affect: Living with a Difficult Past. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bruner, J. S. (1986). Actual Minds, Possible Worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bucur, M. (2009). Heroes and Victims: Remembering War in Twentieth-Century Romania. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byford, J., & Tileagă, C. (2017). Accounts of a Troubled Past: Psychology, History, and Texts of Experience. Qualitative Psychology, 4(1), 101–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, D. (1997). Discourse and Cognition. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frosh, S. (2010). Psychoanalysis Outside the Clinic: Interventions in Psychosocial Studies. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gallinat, A. (2006). Difficult Stories: Public Discourse and Narrative Identity in Eastern Germany. Ethnos, 71, 343–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1988). Concerning the Public Use of History. New German Critique, 44, 40–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J., & Michnik, A. (1994). Overcoming the Past. New Left Review, I/203, 3–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halbwachs, M. (1952/1992). On Collective Memory. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harré, R., & Gillett, G. (1994). The Discursive Mind. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horne, C. (2017). Evaluating Measures and Their Outcomes. In L. Stan & L. Turcescu (Eds.), Justice, Memory and Redress in Romania: New Insights (pp. 45–75). Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keightley, E., & Pickering, M. (2013). Painful Pasts. In E. Keightley & M. Pickering (Eds.), Research Methods for Memory Studies. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • LaCapra, D. (1994). Representing the Holocaust: History, Theory, Trauma. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, M. (1999). Archives in Formation: Privileged Spaces, Popular Archives and Paper Trails. History of the Human Sciences, 12, 65–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mark, J. (2010). The Unfinished Revolution: Making Sense of the Communist Past in Central and Central-Eastern Europe. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Middleton, D., & Brown, S. D. (2005). The Social Psychology of Experience: Studies in Remembering and Forgetting. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nora, P. (1996). General Introduction: Between Memory and History. In P. Nora (Ed.), Realms of Memory (Vol. 1, pp. 1–20) (English language edition edited by L. D. Kritzman). New Year: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plummer, K. (2001). Documents of Life 2: An Invitation to Critical Humanism. London: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Potter, J., & Wetherell, M. (1987). Discourse and Social Psychology: Beyond Attitudes and Behaviour. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, J. (2007). The Last Resistance. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothberg, M. (2009). Multidirectional Memory: Remembering the Holocaust in the Age of Decolonization. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, S., Wertsch, J., & Kosyaeva, T. (2002). Linking Little Narratives to Big Ones: Narrative and Public Memory in History Museums. Culture & Psychology, 8, 96–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, Q. (2002). Visions of Politics: Regarding Method (Vol. I). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D. (1974). The Social Construction of Documentary Reality. Sociological Inquiry, 44, 257–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D. (1987). The Everyday World as Problematic: A Feminist Sociology. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D. (2004). Writing the Social: Critique, Theory and Investigations. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stan, L. (2006). The Vanishing Truth: Politics and Memory in Post-communist Europe. East European Quarterly, 40, 383–408.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stan, L. (2017). Introduction. In L. Stan & L. Turcescu (Eds.), Justice, Memory and Redress in Romania: New Insights (pp. ix–xiii). Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teitel, R. (2000). Transitional Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tileagă, C. (2015). The Nature of Prejudice: Society, Discrimination and Moral Exclusion. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tismăneanu, V. (2008). Democracy and Memory: Romania Confronts Its Communist Past. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 617(1), 166–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valsiner, J., & van der Veer, R. (2000). The Social Mind: The Construction of an Idea. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wertsch, J. (2007). Collective Memory. In J. Valsiner & A. Rosa (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Sociocultural Psychology (pp. 645–660). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Tileagă, C. (2018). Introduction: what does coming to terms with the past mean?. In: Representing Communism After the Fall. Palgrave Studies in Discursive Psychology. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97394-4_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics