Advertisement

The Disappearing Trial: Retrenchment of Litigation in North America

  • Margaret WooEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice book series (IUSGENT, volume 70)

Abstract

Concerned with the rising rate of litigation and seemingly unchecked litigation abuse, countries, such as the U.S. and Canada, are making changes to their civil justice systems. It is a renewed call for minimizing costs and maximizing efficiency. Through legislative actions as well as judicial decisions both countries have moved towards greater encouragement of alternative dispute resolution and efforts to weigh the cost of the litigation against the value of the litigation, and, in some instances, they have heightened the barriers to the courts by restricting jurisdiction and raising pleading requirements. But has the protection of rights been subsumed by concerns over efficiency and cost containment? This contribution assesses these most recent limits in the United States and Canada—in personal jurisdiction, class actions, discovery, and the effects of upholding arbitration clauses that prohibit collective actions—and their likely effects on access to justice.

References

  1. Bogart WA, Kalajdzic J, Matthews I (2007) Class actions in Canada: a national procedure in a multi-jurisdictional society? A report prepared for The Globalization of Class Actions Conference, Oxford University. Available at http://globalclassactions.stanford.edu/sites/default/files/documents/Canada_National_Report.pdf. Accessed 7 June 2018
  2. Jolin B (2016) Quebec’s new code of civil procedure. The Canadian Lawyer, 29 Feb 2016. Available at http://www.canadianlawyermag.com/author/sandra-shutt/quebecs-new-code-of-civil-procedure-3193/. Accessed 7 June 2018
  3. Malin M (2016) The three phases of the supreme court’s arbitration jurisprudence: Empowering the already-empowered. Nevada Law J 17(23)Google Scholar
  4. Resnik J (2015) Diffusing disputes: the public in the private of arbitration, the private in courts, and the erasure of rights. Yale Law J 124:2804–2939Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Northeastern University School of LawBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations