Advertisement

Enforcement by Means of Periodic Penalties (Astreinte) in Slovenia: A Transplant Gone Wild

  • Aleš GaličEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice book series (IUSGENT, volume 70)

Abstract

Already in 1978, undoubtedly as an implant from French law, the concept of astreinte was introduced as a means of indirect coercion to enforce judgments in the (then) Yugoslav legal order. In the Yugoslav era, however, the instrument of astreinte was never widely used in practice and it was mostly overlooked in legal writing as well. After the independence of Slovenia and in the era of socio-political, legal and economic transition, the situation changed. Creditors increasingly started to use the instrument of astreinte, and only then did it become apparent that its regulation did not contain sufficient guarantees against abuse. Rarely has any other concept of Slovenian private law sparked as many controversies in legal doctrine as the concept of astreinte. Nevertheless, in recent years the regulation of astreinte has to a certain degree developed through case law. Some of the disputed issues have been settled and certain necessary safeguards established.

References

  1. Berden A (2004) Sodni penali [Court penalties]. Pravna praksa 11:15–18Google Scholar
  2. Berden A, Kleindienst I (2005) Sodni penali—2 [Court penalties—2]. Pravna praksa 9:20–22Google Scholar
  3. Bizjak A (2004) Sodni penali [Court penalties]. Pravna praksa 11:14–16Google Scholar
  4. Cigoj S (1981) Sodni penali [Court penalties]. Združeno delo 3:496–502Google Scholar
  5. Cigoj S (1984) Komentar obligacijskih razmerij [Commentary on legal relations out of obligations]. ČZ Uradni list, LjubljanaGoogle Scholar
  6. Dika M (2003) Sudski penali [Court penalties]. In: Buljan V et al (eds) Ovrha i stečaj—aktualnosti zakonodavstva i sudske prakse. Inženjerski biro, Zagreb, pp 22–28Google Scholar
  7. Juhart M, Grilc P, Ilešič M et al (1995) Zavarovanje in utrditev obveznosti [Securing and Consolidating Claims]. GV Založba, LjubljanaGoogle Scholar
  8. Keresteš T (2008) Kazni in sodni penali v izvršilnem postopku [Fines and court penalties in enforcement proceedings]. Podjetje in delo 6–7:1027–1036Google Scholar
  9. Poznić B (1987) Gradjansko procesno pravo [Civil procedure]. Savremena administracija, BeogradGoogle Scholar
  10. Rijavec V (2003) Civilno izvršilno pravo [Law on the enforcement of judgments in civil matters]. GV Založba, LjubljanaGoogle Scholar
  11. Strohsack B (1990) Odškodninsko pravo in druge neposlovne obveznosti [Law of torts and other non-contractual obligations]. ČZ Uradni list, LjubljanaGoogle Scholar
  12. Wedam Lukić D (1992) Civilno izvršilno pravo [Law on the enforcement of judgments in civil matters]. ČZ Uradni list, LjubljanaGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of LawUniversity of LjubljanaLjubljanaSlovenia

Personalised recommendations