Skip to main content

Conclusions

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
ODI from BRIC Countries

Abstract

In this chapter, we provide some concluding remarks and suggest future lines of research. To this end, we briefly summarize the content of the previous chapters and comment extensively on the empirical results of our multi-country versus single-country empirical analysis. These results are put in perspective and contrasted with previous studies on related issues, to stress the contribution this book aims to provide to the Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) literature. Empirical posteriors and theoretical priors are matched, to suggest that our findings are not a mere replica of others’ results, but they rather shed some light on previously neglected sides of the Outward Direct Investment (ODI)-performance nexus. In particular, we show that the positive correlation between ODI and firm performance is a matter of both involvement versus non-involvement in ODI and the type of ODI that a firm undertakes. Being true for China and India as well as for the overall group of BRIC economies—embracing also Brazil and Russia—this is a novel contribution of this book. Clearly, this could not be addressed by previous studies as they were based on a more elementary taxonomy of ODI.

At the end of this chapter, policy implications are derived and carefully discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Andreff, W. (2015). Outward Foreign Direct Investment from BRIC Countries: Comparing Strategies of Brazilian, Russian, Indian and Chinese Multinational Companies. European Journal of Comparative Economics, 12, 79–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dai, M., & Yu, M. (2013). Firm R&D, Absorptive Capacity and Learning by Exporting: Firm-Level Evidence from China. World Economy, 36, 1131–1145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du, J., Lu, Y., Tao, Z., & Yu, L. (2012). Do Domestic and Foreign Exporters Differ in Learning by Exporting? Evidence from China. China Economic Review, 23, 296–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haidar, J. (2012). Trade and Productivity: Self-Selection or Learning-by-Exporting in India. Economic Modelling, 29, 1766–1773.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Javorcik, B., Lo Turco, A., & Maggioni, D. (2017). New and Improved: Does FDI Boost Production Complexity in Host Countries? C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Javorcik, B., & Spatareanu, M. (2009). Tough Love: Do Czech Suppliers Learn from Their Relationships with Multinationals? Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 111, 811–833.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kraay, A. (1999). Exports and Economic Performance: Evidence from a Panel of Chinese Enterprises. Revue d’ Economie du Development, 1, 183–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, C., & Yin, X. (2010). The “Productivity Paradox” of Chinese Export Firms: Review and Assessment. China Economist, 25, 74–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu, D. (2012). Exceptional Exporter Performance? Evidence from Chinese Manufacturing Firms. Working Paper University of Rochester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma, Y., Tang, H., & Zhang, Y. (2014). Factor Intensity, Product Switching, and Productivity: Evidence from Chinese Exporters. Journal of International Economics, 92, 349–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mallick, S., & Yang, Y. (2013). Productivity Performance of Export Market Entry and Exit: Evidence from Indian Firms. Review of International Economics, 21, 809–824.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, A., Yang, D., Shi, X., et al. (2010). Exporting and Firm Performance: Chinese Exporters and the Asian Financial Crisis. Review of Economics and Statistics, 92, 822–842.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sauvant, K. (2011). China: Inward and Outward Foreign Direct Investment. Transnational Corporations Review, 3, 1–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Biesebroeck, J. (2014). Productivity, Exporting and Financial Constraints of Chinese SMEs. IDB Working Paper 506.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, H., Yang, J., & Lai, M. (2009). Export Behaviour and Firm Productivity in China. Journal of Chinese Economic and Business Studies, 7, 409–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, Y. (2008). The Impact of Exporting on Firm Performance: Evidence from Chinese Firms. London: Queen Mary University of London Mimeo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, Y., & Mallick, S. (2010). Export Premium, Self-Selection and Learning-by-Exporting: Evidence from Chinese Matched Firms. The World Economy, 33, 1218–1240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Gattai, V., Mechelli, R., Natale, P. (2019). Conclusions. In: ODI from BRIC Countries. Palgrave Pivot, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97340-1_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics