The Arab League and the GCC—Failures of Regional Organization in the Muslim World?

  • Mujtaba Ali Isani


This chapter directs attention to Muslim citizens’ attitudes toward regional organizations. Focusing on Arab citizens in particular, it concentrates on the Arab League and the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC). The former is one of the world’s oldest international and regional organizations; the latter has long been relatively unknown, despite being much more successful in its policies than the Arab League. The chapter argues that public opinion toward these organizations is most affected by each organization’s performance respective to its purported aims. Therefore, it is expected that the Arab League would be perceived less favorably than the GCC. Several datasets are used to test this chapter’s hypothesis. The findings indicate that favorability toward the GCC is indeed significantly higher than toward the Arab League. For individual-level factors, the chapter finds the evaluation of the Arab League performance is most significant in affecting attitudes toward the League.


Arab League Gulf Cooperation Council Muslim Attitudes Regional organization 


  1. Ashforth, B. E., & Gibbs, B. W. (1990). The double-edge of organizational legitimation. Organization Science, 1(2), 177–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barnett, M., & Solingen, E. (2007). Designed to fail or failure of design? The origins and legacy of the Arab League. In A. Acharya & A. I. Johnston (Eds.), Crafting cooperation: Regional institutions in comparative perspective (pp. 180–220). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Boomgaarden, H. G., Schuck, A. R. T., Elenbaas, M., & De Vreese, C. H. (2011). Mapping EU attitudes: Conceptual and empirical dimensions of Euroscepticism and EU support. European Union Politics, 12(2), 241–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Climent, J. (2015). World terrorism: An encyclopedia of political violence from ancient times to the post-9/11 era. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Dellmuth, L., & Tallberg, J. (2015). The social legitimacy of international organizations: Interest representation, institutional performance, and confidence extrapolation in the United Nations. Review of International Studies, 41(3), 451–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Duina, F., & Lenz, T. (2016). Regionalism and diffusion revisited: From final design towards stages of decision-making. Review of International Studies, 42(4), 773–797.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ecker-Ehrhardt, M. (2012). Cosmopolitan politicization: How perceptions of interdependence foster citizens’ expectations in international institutions. European Journal of International Relations, 18(3), 481–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Edwards, M. S. (2009). Public support for the international economic organizations: Evidence from developing countries. The Review of International Organizations, 4(2), 185–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Flores, T. E., & Nooruddin, I. (2016). Elections in hard times: Building stronger democracies in the 21st century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Furia, P. A., & Lucas, R. T. E. (2006). Determinants of Arab public opinion on foreign relations. International Studies Quarterly, 50(3), 585–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gabel, M. (1998). Public support for European integration: An empirical test of five theories. The Journal of Politics, 60(2), 333–354.Google Scholar
  12. Gulf Cooperation Council: GCC Charter. (1981). Accessed 20 Feb 17.
  13. Hainmueller, J., & Hiscox, M. J. (2006). Learning to love globalization: Education and individual attitudes toward international trade. International Organization, 60(2), 469–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Harteveld, E., van der Meer, T., & De Vries, C. E. (2013). In Europe we trust? Exploring three logics of trust in the European Union. European Union Politics, 14(4), 542–565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Inglehart, R., Haerpfer, C., Moreno, A., Welzel, C., Kizilova, K., Diez-Medrano, J., Lagos, M., Norris, P., Ponarin, E., & Puranen B. et al. (Eds.). (2014). World values survey: All rounds - country-pooled. Madrid: JD Systems Institute.
  16. Isani, M., & Schlipphak, B. (2017a). The desire for sovereignty—An explanation of EU attitudes in the Arab world. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 55(3), 502–517.Google Scholar
  17. Isani, M., & Schlipphak, B. (2017b). In the EU we trust: European Muslim attitudes toward the European Union. European Union Politics, 18(4), 658–677.Google Scholar
  18. Jhee, B. K. (2009). Public support for regional integration in Northeast Asia: An empirical test of affective and utilitarian models. International Political Science Review, 30(1), 49–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Johnson, T. (2011). Guilt by association: The link between states’ influence and the legitimacy of intergovernmental organizations. The Review of International Organizations, 6(1), 57–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kaltenthaler, K. C., Gelleny, R. D., & Ceccoli, S. J. (2004). Explaining citizen support for trade liberalization. International Studies Quarterly, 48(4), 829–851.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Keohane, R. O., & Nye, J. S. (1987). Power and interdependence revisited. International Organization, 41(4), 725–753.Google Scholar
  22. Kwon, H. Y. (2011). Globalization, cultural openness, and public preferences for East Asian economic integration in South Korea. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 23(1), 2–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lawson, F. H. (1999). Theories of integration in a new context: The Gulf Cooperation Council. In K. P. Thomas & M. A. Tétreault (Eds.), Racing to regionalize: Democracy, capitalism, and regional political economy. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
  24. League of Arab States. (1945). Charter of the League of Arab States. Accessed 23 Feb 17.
  25. Margalit, Y. (2012). Lost in globalization: International economic integration and the sources of popular discontent. International Studies Quarterly, 56(3), 484–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mayda, A. M., & Rodrik, D. (2005). Why are some people (and countries) more protectionist than others? European Economic Review, 49(6), 1393–1430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. McLaren, L. M. (2002). Public support for the European Union: Cost/benefit analysis or perceived cultural threat? The Journal of Politics, 64(2), 551–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. McLaren, L. M. (2007). Explaining mass-level Euroscepticism: Identity, interests, and institutional distrust. Acta Politica, 42(2–3), 233–251.Google Scholar
  29. Moravcsik, A. (1997). Taking preferences seriously: A liberal theory of international politics. International Organization, 51(4), 513–553.Google Scholar
  30. Moorthy, R., & Benny, G. (2012). Attitude towards community building in Association of Southeast Asian Nations. American Journal of Applied Sciences, 9(4), 557–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Nye, J. S. (1971). Peace in parts: Integration and conflict in regional organization. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
  32. Pinfari, M. (2009). Nothing but failure? The Arab League and the Gulf Cooperation Council as mediators in Middle Eastern conflicts (Crisis States Research Centre Working Paper). Accessed 25 July 2016.
  33. Scheve, K. F., & Slaughter, M. J. (2001). What determines individual trade-policy preferences? Journal of International Economics, 54(2), 267–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Schlipphak, B. (2015). Measuring attitudes toward regional organizations outside Europe. The Review of International Organizations, 10(3), 351–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Schoen, H. (2007). Personality traits and foreign policy attitudes in German public opinion. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 51(3), 408–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Schulz, M., & Schulz, H. L. (2005). The Middle East: Regional instability and fragmentation. In M. Farell, B. Hettne, & L. Van Langenhove (Eds.), Global politics of regionalism: Theory and practice (pp. 187–201). London and Ann Arbor: Pluto Press. Google Scholar
  37. Söderbaum, F. (2004). Modes of regional governance in Africa: Neoliberalism, sovereignty boosting, and shadow networks. Global Governance, 10(4), 419–436.Google Scholar
  38. Solingen, E. (2008). The genesis, design and effects of regional institutions: Lessons from East Asia and the Middle East. International Studies Quarterly, 52(2), 261–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Tallberg, J., Sommerer, T., Squatrito, T., & Lundgren, M. (2016). The performance of international organizations: A policy output approach. Journal of European Public Policy, 23(7), 1077–1096.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Tripp, C. (1995). The future of Iraq and of regional security. In G. Kemp & J. G. Stein (Eds.), Powder keg in the Middle East: The struggle for Gulf security (pp. 133–159). Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
  41. Zacher, M. W. (1979). International conflicts and collective security organization, 1946–77: The United Nations, Organization of American States, Organization of African Unity, and Arab League. New York and Toronto: Praeger.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mujtaba Ali Isani
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Political ScienceUniversity of MuensterMuensterGermany

Personalised recommendations