Skip to main content

On Good Listening, Postcritique, and Ta-Nehisi Coates’ Affective Testimony

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Affect Theory and Literary Critical Practice

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Affect Theory and Literary Criticism ((PSATLC))

Abstract

This chapter argues that a methodological shift from critical inquiry driven by a hermeneutics of suspicion toward more affective modes of reading can make literature a useful technology for cultivating a sensibility to the affective experiences of other corporealities. In contrast to skeptical approaches to “fellow-feeling” and “compassionate emotions” exhibited by prominent feminist figures like Sara Ahmed and Lauren Berlant, this chapter adopts the ideas of affect theory and new materialism to the study of literature by means of what Rita Felski has termed a “postcritical attitude.” Turning to Ta-Nehisi Coates’ Between the World and Me (2015), the chapter shows how such an adaptation makes literature available as a useful technology for—in Latour’s phrasing—“learning to be affected” by the lives of others.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JSu1GKRklEw.

  2. 2.

    “Video of Officer Pranking Driver with Ice Cream Goes Viral,” http://abcnews.go.com/US/video-officer-pranking-driver-ice-cream-viral/story?id=41038709.

  3. 3.

    “Prankster Cops hand out Ice Cream Cones instead of Tickets,” http://nypost.com/2016/08/01/prankster-cops-hand-out-ice-cream-cones-instead-of-tickets/.

  4. 4.

    Felski is but the latest budding in a much larger theoretical shift from critical or paranoid readings to affirmative or redemptive engagements (see, for instance, Sedgwick 2003, 123–151; Grosz 2005, 3; Massumi 2002, 12–13; Tuin 2011, 23–29).

  5. 5.

    The pun is inspired by Donna Haraway (2013, 145).

  6. 6.

    I want to thank Rita Felski for helping me elaborate on this idea.

  7. 7.

    An exception, here, is Martha Nussbaum PoeticJustice (1996). As several scholars have pointed out, though, Nussbaum’s thinking seems to be too much indebted to a classical humanism for it to be in concordance with recent theories of affect and materiality (e.g., Braidotti 2013, 39).

  8. 8.

    The term “enfleshment” is borrowed from Karen Barad (2015, 387–422).

  9. 9.

    The emphasis on the trans-generational materialization of race is inspired by recent new materialist work by Xin Liu (2015, 71–72).

  10. 10.

    This formulation is inspired by Sara Ahmed (2007, 158).

  11. 11.

    The notion of “in-carnation” is inspired by Mayra Rivera (2015, 59–85).

  12. 12.

    Achille Mbembe, “Frantz Fanon and the Politics of Viscerality,” paper given at the Franklin Humanities Institute, Duke University, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lg_BEodNaEA.

References

  • Ahmed, Sara. 2007. Phenomenology of Whiteness. Feminist Theory, 149.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2014 [2004]. The Cultural Politics of Emotion. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anker, Elizabeth S., and Rita Felski, eds. 2017. Critique and Postcritique. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barad, Karen. 2015. TransMaterialities: Trans*/Matter/Realities and Queer Political Imaginings. GLQ 21: 2–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berlant, Lauren. 2004. Introduction: Compassion (and Withholding). In Compassion: The Culture and Politics of an Emotion, ed. Lauren Berlant, 2004. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhabha, Homi K. 1994. The Location of Culture. London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braidotti, Rosi. 2013. The Posthuman. Cambridge/Malden: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coates, Ta-Nehisi. 2015. Between the World and Me. New York: Spiegel & Grau.

    Google Scholar 

  • Code, Lorraine. 2006. Ecological Thinking: The Politics of Epistemic Location. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Colebrook, Claire. 2002a. Deleuzian Criticism. In Introducing Criticism at the 21st Century. Ed. Julian Wolfreys. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2002b. Gilles Deleuze. London/New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, Gilles, and Félix Guattari. 1993 [1991]. What Is Philosophy? Trans. Hugh Tomlinson and Graham Burchell. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Tuin, Iris. 2011. ‘A Different Starting Point, a Different Metaphysics’: Reading Bergson and Barad Diffractively. Hypatia 26: 22–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Felski, Rita. 2015. The Limits of Critique. Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Flatley, Jonathan. 2008. Affective Mapping: Melancholia and the Politics of Modernism. Cambridge/Massachusetts/London: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Grosz, Elizabeth. 2005. Time Travels: Feminism, Nature, Power. Durham/London: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, Donna. 2013. Sowing Worlds: A Seed Bag for Terraforming with Earth Others. In Beyond the Cyborg: Adventures with Donna Haraway, ed. Margret Grebowicz and Helen Merrick. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • hooks, bell. 2013. Writing Beyond Race: Living Theory and Practice. New York/Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, Bruno. 2004. How to Talk About the Body? The Normative Dimension of Science Studies. Body & Society, 205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Xin. 2015. Trilling Race: The Political Economy of Racialised Visual-aural Encounters. Åbo: Åbo Akademi University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massumi, Brian. 2002. Parables for the Virtual: Movement, Affect, Sensation. Durham/London: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2005. Fear (the Spectrum Said). positions 13: 31–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moi, Toril. 2016. Revolution of the Ordinary: Literary Studies After Wittgenstein, Austin, and Cavell. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, Martha. 1996. Poetic Justice: The Literary Imagination and Public Life. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rivera, Mayra. 2015. Poetics of the Flesh. Durham/London: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sedgwick, Eve Kosofsky. 2003. Touching Feeling: Affect, Pedagogy, Performativity. Durham/London: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Spillers, Hortense J. 1987. Mama’s Baby, Papa’s Maybe: An American Grammar Book. Diacritics 17: 64–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty. 1994. Can the Subaltern Speak? In Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture, ed. Cary Nelson and Larry Grossberg. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tygstrup, Frederik, and Devika Sharma, eds. 2015. Structures of Feeling: Affectivity and the Study of Culture. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vermeulen, Pieter. 2015. Contemporary Literature and the End of the Novel: Creature, Affect, Form. New York/Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Warhole, Robin R. 2003. Having a Good Cry: Effeminate Feelings and Pop-culture Forms. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warner, Michael. 2004. Uncritical Reading. In Polemic: Critical or Uncritical, ed. Jane Gallop. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Skiveren, T. (2019). On Good Listening, Postcritique, and Ta-Nehisi Coates’ Affective Testimony. In: Ahern, S. (eds) Affect Theory and Literary Critical Practice. Palgrave Studies in Affect Theory and Literary Criticism. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97268-8_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics