Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Biopolitics, Governmentality and the Banopticon

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Discourse of Security

  • 767 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter proposes that further critical theories of the state are necessary to engage with security discourse. The first of these, governmentality, is a dispersed means of exercising power upon populations, informed by political economy and articulated through security apparatuses. Power is also exercised over populations through the control of human life which is carried out by technologies of disciplinary power, or ‘biopower’. Additionally, the tendency for states to increasingly assert special powers of emergency represents the outworking of the principle of the ‘state of exception’, through which the sovereign power of the state is totalised by suspending normal juridical procedures. Finally, the contemporary episteme of (in)security has led to the establishment of a ‘banoptic dispositif’ within late capitalist societies (after Bigo in Terror, Insecurity and Liberty. Illiberal Practices of Liberal Regimes After 9/11. Routledge, Abingdon, pp. 10–48, 2008).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Agamben, G. (1998). Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agamben, G. (2005). The State of Exception. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bigo, D. (2005a). Frontier Controls in the European Union: Who Is in Control? In D. Bigo & E. Guild (Eds.), Controlling Frontiers. Free Movement into and Within Europe (pp. 49–99). Burlington, VT: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bigo, D. (2005b). Global (In)Security: The Field of the Professionals of Unease Management and the Ban-Opticon. In J. Solomon & N. Sakai (Eds.), Traces: A Multilingual Series of Cultural Theory, 4: ‘Sovereign Police, Global Complicity’ (pp. 104–155). Hong Kong: University of Hong Kong Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bigo, D. (2006a). Security, Exception, Ban and Surveillance: The Panopticon and Beyond. In D. Lyon (Ed.), Theorizing Surveillance (pp. 46–68). Cullompton: Wilan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bigo, D. (2006b). Internal and External Aspects of Security. European Security, 15(4), 405–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bigo, D. (2007). Detention of Foreigners, States of Exception, and the Social Practices of Control of the Banopticon. In P. K. Rajaram & C. Grundy-Warr (Eds.), Borderscapes: Hidden Geographies and Politics at Territory’s Edge (pp. 57–101). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bigo, D. (2008). Globalized (In)Security: The Field and the Ban-Opticon. In D. Bigo & A. Tsoukala (Eds.), Terror, Insecurity and Liberty: Illiberal Practices of Liberal Regimes After 9/11 (pp. 10–48). Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bigo, D. (2010a). Freedom and Speed in Enlarged Borderzones. In V. Squire (Ed.), The Contested Politics of Mobility, Borderzones and Irregularity (pp. 31–50). Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bigo, D. (2010b). Delivering Liberty and Security? In D. Bigo, S. Carrera, E. Guild, & R. Walker (Eds.), The Reframing of Freedom When Associated with Security Europe’s 21st Century Challenge: Delivering Liberty and Security (pp. 388–420). Farnham: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bigo, D. (2014). The (In)Securitization Practices of the Three Universes of EU Border Control: Military/Navy—Border Guards/Police—Database Analysts. Security Dialogue, 45(3), 209–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bigo, D., & Tsoukala, A. (Eds.). (2006). The (In)Security Games. Paris: L’Harmattan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bigo, D., & Tsoukala, A. (Eds.). (2008). Terror, Insecurity and Liberty. Illiberal Practices of Liberal Regimes After 9/11. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bigo, D., Bonelli, L., Chi, D., & Olsson, C. (2007). Mapping the Field of the EU Internal Security Agencies. In D. Bigo (Ed.), The Field of the EU Internal Security Agencies (pp. 5–66). Paris: Centre d’études sur les conflits/l’Harmattan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bigo, D., Carrera, S., Guild, E., & Walker, R. (Eds.). (2010). Europe’s 21st Century Challenge: Delivering Liberty and Security. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bigo, D., Carrera, S., & Guild, E. (2012). Foreigners, Refugees, or Minorities?: Rethinking People in the Context of Border Controls and Visas. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1972). Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1980). The Logic of Practice. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buzan, B., Wæver, O., & de Wilde, J. (1998). Security: A New Framework for Analysis. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chouliaraki, L., & Fairclough, N. (1999). Discourse in Late Modernity: Rethinking Critical Discourse Analysis. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dean, M. (2010). Governmentality: Power and Rule in Modern Society. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Debord, G. (1967). La Societe du Spectacle. Paris: Gallimard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elias, N. (1994). The Civilizing Process. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and Power. Harlow: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. Harlow: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairclough, N. (2000). New Labour, New Language? Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairclough, N. (2003). Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ferejohn, J., & Pasquino, P. (2004). The Law of the Exception: A Typology of Emergency Powers. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 2(2), 210–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1967). Madness and Civilization. London: Tavistock.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1970). The Order of Things. London: Tavistock.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1972). The Archaeology of Knowledge. London: Tavistock.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1973). The Birth of the Clinic. London: Tavistock.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and Punish. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1984a). The History of Sexuality: An Introduction. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1984b). Polemics, Politics, and Problematizations: An Interview with Michel Foucault. In P. Rabinow (Ed.), The Foucault Reader (pp. 381–390). New York: Pantheon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1994). Dits et ecrits, 3–4. Paris: Gallimard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (2003). Society Must Be Defended: Lectures at the Collège de France 1975–76. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (2007). Security, Territory, Population: Lectures at the Collège de France 1977–78. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (2008). The Birth of Biopolitics. Lectures at the Collège de France, 1978–1979. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowler, R., Hodge, B., Kress, G., & Trew, T. (Eds.). (1979). Language and Control. London: Routledge and Keegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodge, R., & Kress, G. (1979). Language as Ideology. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huysmans, J. (2004). Minding Exceptions: Politics of Insecurity and Liberal Democracy. Contemporary Political Theory, 3(3), 321–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kellner, D. (2005). Media Spectacle and the Crisis of Democracy. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laclau, E. (2007). Bare Life or Social Indeterminacy? In M. Calarco & S. DeCaroli (Eds.), On Agamben: Sovereignty and Life. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larner, W., & Walters, W. (2004). Global Governmentality: Governing International Spaces. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, P., & Rose, N. (1990). Governing Economic Life. Economy and Society, 17(2), 225–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, C. (2008). The Philosophy of Agamben. McGill: Queen’s University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nancy, J.-L. (1983). L’impératif catégorique. Paris: Flammarion.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris, A. (2005). Politics, Metaphysics, and Death: Essays on Giorgio Agamben’s Homo Sacer. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pennycook, A. D. (2001). Critical Applied Linguistics: A Critical Introduction. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prozorov, S. (2014). Agamben and Politics: A Critical Introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, N., & Miller, P. (1992). Political Power Beyond the State: Problematics of Government. British Journal of Sociology, 43(2), 303–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, C. (1985/1922). Political Theology. Four Chapters on the Concept of Sovereignty (G. Schwab, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaughan-Williams, N. (2012). Border Politics: The Limits of Sovereign Power. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaughan-Williams, N. (2017a). Europe’s Border Crisis: Biopolitical Security and Beyond. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaughan-Williams, N. (2017b). The Biopolitics of European Border Security 1. In S. Prozorov & S. Rentea (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Biopolitics (pp. 225–235). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, R. B. J. (1993). Inside/Outside: International Relations as Political Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walters, W., & Haahr, J. H. (2005). Governing Europe: Discourse, Governmentality and European Integration. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Walters, W. (2012). Governmentality: Critical Encounters. Abingdon/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (Eds.). (2016). Methods of Critical Discourse Studies (3rd ed.). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centre for Applied Linguistics, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK

    Malcolm N. MacDonald

  2. School of Education, University of Hull, Hull, UK

    Duncan Hunter

Authors
  1. Malcolm N. MacDonald
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Duncan Hunter
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Malcolm N. MacDonald .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

MacDonald, M.N., Hunter, D. (2019). Biopolitics, Governmentality and the Banopticon. In: The Discourse of Security. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97193-3_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97193-3_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-97192-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-97193-3

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation