Advertisement

High-Order Modulation Formats for Future Optical Communication Systems

  • André L. N. SouzaEmail author
  • José Hélio da C. Júnior
Chapter
Part of the Telecommunications and Information Technology book series (TIT)

Abstract

Transceivers must evolve to cope with the ever-increasing traffic demand on optical networks. Some of their new features include using high-order modulation formats combined with more complex forward error correcting codes, nonlinear compensation, and probabilistic shaping. Beyond performance enhancement, power consumption is also an issue. This chapter focuses on some simulation results of using supervised phase recovery algorithm for complexity and power consumption reduction and experimental results on probabilistic shaping for performance enhancement.

Keywords

Higher Order Modulation Formats (HOMFs) Probabilistic Shaping (PS) Phase Recovery Algorithm Optical Signal-to-noise Ratio (OSNR) Lower OSNRs 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was partially supported by FUNTTEL/FINEP and by Sao Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP), grant no. 2015/25513-6.

The authors thank Dr. Giovanni Beninca de Farias for reviewing a draft of this chapter.

References

  1. 1.
    Reis JD, Shukla V, Stauffer DR, Gass K (2015) Technology options for 400G implementation. Technical report, Optical Networking Forum (OIF) White PaperGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rahman T, Rafique D, Spinnler B, Bohn M, Napoli A, Okonkwo C, de Waardt H (2016) 38.4 Tb/s transmission of single-carrier serial line-rate 400 Gb/s PM-64QAM over 328km for metro and data center interconnect applications. In: Optical fiber communications conference and exhibition (OFC), IEEE, pp 1–3Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Rios-Müller R, Renaudier J, Brindel P, Simonneau C, Tran P, Ghazisaeidi A, Fernandez I, Schmalen L, Charlet G (2014) Optimized spectrally efficient transceiver for 400-Gb/s single carrier transport. In: 2014 European conference on optical communication (ECOC), IEEE, pp 1–3Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Geyer J, Doerr C, Aydinlik M, Nadarajah N, Caballero A, Rasmussen C, Mikkelsen B (2015) Practical implementation of higher order modulation beyond 16-QAM. In: Optical fiber communications conference and exhibition (OFC), 2015, IEEE, pp 1–3Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chien HC, Yu J (2016) On single-carrier 400G line side optics using PM-256QAM. In: Proceedings of 42nd European conference on optical communication ECOC, VDE, pp 1–3Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chen X, Chandrasekhar S, Randel S, Gu W, Winzer P (2016) Experimental quantification of implementation penalties from limited ADC resolution for nyquist shaped higher-order QAM. In: 2016 optical fiber communications conference and exhibition (OFC), pp 1–3Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Pfau T, Hoffmann S, Noé R (2009) Hardware-efficient coherent digital receiver concept with feedforward carrier recovery for \( M \)-QAM constellations. J Lightwave Technol 27(8):989–999CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Magarini M, Barletta L, Spalvieri A, Vacondio F, Pfau T, Pepe M, Bertolini M, Gavioli G (2012) Pilot-symbols-aided carrier-phase recovery for 100-G PM-QPSK digital coherent receivers. IEEE Photon Technol Lett 24(9):739–741.  https://doi.org/10.1109/LPT.2012.2187439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rafique D, Rahman T, Napoli A, Calabró S, Spinnler B (2014) FEC overhead and fiber nonlinearity mitigation: performance and power consumption tradeoffs. OFC 2014:1–3.  https://doi.org/10.1364/OFC.2014.W2A.32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rahman T, Rafique D, Napoli A, Man E, Kuschnerov M, Spinnler B, Bohn M, Okonkwo CM, Waardt H (2014) FEC overhead optimization for long-haul transmission of PM-16QAM based 400 Gb/s super-channel. In: European conference on optical communication (ECOC), pp 1–3Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ip E, Kahn J (2008) Compensation of dispersion and nonlinear impairments using digital backpropagation. J Lightwave Technol 26:3416–3425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mussolin M, Rafique D, Mårtensson J, Forzati M, Fischer JK, Molle L, Nölle M, Schubert C, Ellis AD (2011) Polarization multiplexed 224 Gb/s 16QAM transmission employing digital back-propagation. In: European conference on optical communication (ECOC), pp 1–3Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Fehenberger T, Alvarado A, Bayvel P, Hanik N (2015a) On achievable rates for long-haul fiber-optic communications. Opt Express 23:9183–9191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Fehenberger T, Bocherer G, Alvarado A, , Hanik N (2015b) LDPC coded modulation with probabilistic shaping for optical fiber systems. In: Optical fiber communication conference and exposition (OFC/NOFC), pp 1–3Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Buchali F, Bocherer G, Idler W, Schmalen L, Schulte P, Steiner F (2015) Experimental demonstration of capacity increase and rate-adaptation by probabilistically shaped 64-QAM. In: European conference on optical communication (ECOC), pp 1–3Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Diniz C, Hélio J, Souza A, Lima T, Lopes R, Rossi S, Garrich M, Reis JD, Arantes D, Oliveira J, Mello DAA (2016) Network cost savings enabled by probabilistic shaping in DP-16QAM 200-Gb/s systems. In: Optical fiber communication conference and exposition (OFC/NOFC), pp 1–3Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ghazisaeidi A, Ruiz IFJ, Müller RR, Schmalen L, Tran P, Brindel P, Meseguer AC, Hu Q, Buchali F, Charlet G, Renaudier J (2017) Advanced C+L-band transoceanic transmission systems based on probabilistically shaped PDM-64QAM. J Lightwave Technol 35:1291–1299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Zhu Y, Li A, Peng WR, Kan C, Li Z, Chowdhury S, Cui Y, Bai Y (2017) Spectrally-efficient single-carrier 400G transmission enabled by probabilistic shaping. In: Optical fiber communication conference and exposition (OFC/NOFC), pp 1–3Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Chandrasekhar S, Li B, Cho J, Chen X, Burrows E, Raybon G, Winzer P (2016) High-spectral-efficiency transmission of PDM 256-QAM with parallel probabilistic shaping at record rate-reach trade-offs. In: European conference on optical communication (ECOC), pp 1–3Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Cho J, Chen X, Chandrasekhar S, Raybon G, Dar R, Schmalen L, Burrows E, Adamiecki A, Corteselli S, Pan Y, Correa D, McKay B, Zsigmond S, Winzer P, Grubb S (2017) Trans-atlantic field trial using probabilistically shaped 64-QAM at high spectral efficiencies and single-carrier real-time 250-Gb/s 16-QAM. In: Optical fiber communication conference and exposition (OFC/NOFC), pp 1–3Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Essiambre RJ, Tkach RW (2012) Capacity trends and limits of optical communication networks. Proc IEEE 100:1035–1055CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ungerboeck G (1982) Channel coding with multi-level/phase signals. IEEE Trans Inf Theory 28:55–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Wachsmann U, Fischer RFH, Huber J (1999) Multilevel codes: theoretical concepts and practical design rules. IEEE Trans Inf Theory 45:1361–1391MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Gho GH, Kahn J (2012) Rate-adaptive modulation and low-density parity-check coding for optical fiber transmission systems. J Opt Commun Netw 4:760–768CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Forney GD, Ungerboeck G (1998) Modulation and coding for linear gaussian channels. IEEE Trans Inf Theory 44(6):2384–2415.  https://doi.org/10.1109/18.720542MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kschischang F, Pasupathy S (1993) Optimal nonuniform signaling for gaussian channels. IEEE Trans Inf Theory 39:913–929CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Huffman DA (1952) A method for the construction of minimum redundancy codes. Proc IRE 40:1098–1101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Hélio J (2016) Avaliação experimental da formatação probabilística aplicada a sistemas ópticos DP-16QAM a 200 Gb/s. Master’s thesis, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, BrasilGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Shafik RA, Rahman MS, Islam AR (2006) On the extended relationships among EVM. BER and SNR as performance metrics. In, International conference on electrical and computer engineering (ICECE)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • André L. N. Souza
    • 1
    Email author
  • José Hélio da C. Júnior
    • 1
  1. 1.Optical Technologies DivisionCPqDCampinasBrazil

Personalised recommendations