Skip to main content

The Many Enemies of Co-productions in Italy: Moviegoers, Broadcasters, Policy-Makers and Half-Hearted Producers

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
European Film and Television Co-production

Part of the book series: Palgrave European Film and Media Studies ((PEFMS))

Abstract

The chapter investigates the reasons why Italy plays a marginal role in international co-productions. The author identifies four stakeholders that discourage co-productions: (a) moviegoers, who basically prefer 100% national films or US movies; (b) broadcasters, who are unwilling to finance-release-schedule risky films; (c) policymakers, who are more interested into attracting film shoots and promoting Italian executive producers for foreign films (through local funds & tax incentives) than into favouring co-productions; and (d) Italian producers themselves, who are not brave enough to explore new production patterns. For all these reasons, the number of international co-productions with Italy is stable and has not been influenced by the evolutions of national/local laws of the past few years. Of course, virtuous exceptions exist, as Paolo Sorrentino’s films demonstrate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 29.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 37.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In the context of media industries, the concept of “smallness” is connected to four variables: (a) the geographical area of the country; (b) the number of residents; (c) GDP per capita; (d) forms of domination by other countries (Hjort and Petrie 2007).

  2. 2.

    Cfr. the “European Cinema Yearbook” edited and published by MEDIA Salles: www.mediasalles.it.

  3. 3.

    “Cultural interest films” are those films that, according to the Italian Ministry of Cultural Heritage’s evaluation, hold a particular cultural, artistic and spectacular value. Every year some of the films that gained this label receive a direct public financing by the Ministry itself.

  4. 4.

    For a full list of economic advantages provided by international co-productions, please consult Hoskins et al. (1997).

  5. 5.

    Greece co-produced 2 films in 2005, 2 in 2006, 3 in 2007, 5 in 2008, 2 in 2009, 2 in 2010, 10 in 2011, 10 in 2012, 10 in 2013, 12 in 2014, 6 in 2015 (Lumiere data, cfr. Papadimitriou 2017, 170).

  6. 6.

    Spain co-produced 45 films in 2010, 74 in 2011, 55 in 2012, 68 in 2013, 100 in 2014, 74 in 2015, (European Audiovisual Observatory 2017).

  7. 7.

    Paolo Sorrentino stands for an excellent example of international television co-productions, too. He created, wrote and directed the series The Young Pope (2016), which was a co-production between Italy, France and Spain, financed by HBO and Canal+, and it starred Jude Law and Diane Keaton.

References

  • AGCOM. 2017. Relazione Annuale 2017. Accessed October 9. https://www.agcom.it/documents/10179/8078012/RELAZIONE+ANNUALE+2017_documento+completo.pdf/2021e7ba-8250-4239-9a46-5d82fdbf702c?version=1.0.

  • Álvarez-Monzoncillo, José, Antonio Baraybar-Frenández, and Javier López-Villanueva. 2015. Audiovisual Production in Spain. Fewer Resources, Same Problems, New Challenges. Economia della cultura 25 (2): 211–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cucco, Marco. 2013. From the State to the Regions: The Devolution of Italian Cinema. Journal of Italian Cinema & Media Studies 1 (3): 263–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2017. The Vertical Axis of Film Policies in Europe: Between Subsidiarity and Local Anarchy. In Reconceptualising Film Policies, ed. Nolwenn Mingant and Cecilia Tirtaine, 263–275. New York: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cucco, Marco, and Giacomo Manzoli, eds. 2017. Il cinema di Stato. Finanziamento pubblico ed economia simbolica nel cinema italiano contemporaneo. Bologna: Il Mulino.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Audiovisual Observatory. 2017. World Film Market Trends—Focus 2017. Strasbourg: European Audiovisual Observatory.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higson, Andrew. 2015. British Cinema, Europe and the Global Reach for Audience. In European Cinema and Television: Cultural Policy and Everyday Life, ed. Ib Bondebjerg, Eva Novrup Redvall, and Andrew Higson, 127–150. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hjort, Mette. 2010. On the Plurality of Cinematic Transnationalism. In World Cinema, Transnational Perspectives, ed. Natasa Durovicová and Kathleen Newman, 12–33. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hjort, Mette, and Duncan Petrie, eds. 2007. The Cinema of Small Nations. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoskins, Colin, Stuart McFadyen, and Adam Finn. 1997. Global Television and Film: An Introduction to the Economics of the Business. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoskins, Colin, and Rolf Mirus. 1988. Reasons of the US Dominance of the International Trade in Television Programmes. Media, Culture & Society 10 (4): 499–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jäckel, Anne. 1996. European Co-production Strategies. The Case of France and Britain. In Film Policy: International, National and Regional Perspectives, ed. Albert Moran, 85–97. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanzler, Martin. 2015. The Theatrical Market for European Films Outside Europe. Strasbourg: European Audiovisual Observatory.

    Google Scholar 

  • MiBACT. 2017. Tutti i numeri del cinema italiano—anno 2016. Accessed October 9, 2017. http://www.cinema.beniculturali.it/Notizie/4483/67/tutti-i-numeri-del-cinema-italiano-2016/.

  • Morawetz, Norbert, Janet Hardy, Colin Haslam, and Keith Randle. 2007. Finance, Policy and Industrial Dynamics—The Rise of Co-productions in the Film Industry. Industry and Innovation 14 (4): 421–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papadimitriou, Lydia. 2017. Transitions in the Periphery: Funding Film Production in Greece since the Financial Crisis. International Journal on Media Management 19 (2): 164–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Talavera Milla, Julio, Gilles Fontaine, and Martin Kanzler. 2015. Public Financing for Film and Television Content. The State of Soft Money in Europe. Strasbourg: European Audiovisual Observatory.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wasko, Janet. 2014. The Study of the Political Economy of the Media in the Twenty-First Century. International Journal of Media & Cultural Politics 10 (3): 259–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Cucco, M. (2018). The Many Enemies of Co-productions in Italy: Moviegoers, Broadcasters, Policy-Makers and Half-Hearted Producers. In: Hammett-Jamart, J., Mitric, P., Novrup Redvall, E. (eds) European Film and Television Co-production. Palgrave European Film and Media Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97157-5_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics