Abstract
Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway, and Sweden form a group of the Nordic welfare states. Culturally, economically, and politically, these countries share historical ties with each other with a strong role of the state in social policy and education. Here, we present the main features of the current models of special needs education in mathematics in these countries. In all these countries, the primary education is free for families, and the role of the state in regulating the educational system has been strong. However, despite cultural similarities, the solutions and policies within the educational systems have developed to different directions.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Bonesrønning, H., Iversen, J. M. V., & Pettersen, I. (2010). Kommunal skolepolitikk etter Kunnskapsløftet. Med spesielt fokus på økt bruk av spesialundervisning. Trondheim, Norway: Senter for økonomisk forskning (SØF).
Butterworth, B. (2003). Dyscalculia screener. London: nferNelson.
Coughlan, S. (2014). BBC News Education and Family: Brain scientists to work with schools on how to learn. January 7th, 2014. Available at http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/education-25627739
Common Goals (2016). Om Fælles Mål. København: Undervisningsminiteriet. Retrieved from https://uvm.dk/folkeskolen/fag-timetal-og-overgange/faelles-maal/om-faelles-maal
Daland, E., & Dalvang, T. (2009). The compass model – A possible tool for dialogue, reasoning and understanding of situations in which the learners experience difficulties in their mathematical eduaction. In K. Linnanmäki & L. Gustafsson (Eds.), Different learners – Different math? (pp. 173–180). Vasa, Finland: The Faculty of Education, Åbo Akademi University.
Daland, E., & Dalvang, T. (2016). Matematikkompasset. Statped. Læringsressurs.
Eurydice (2011). Key data on Education in Europe. Eurydice network. Retrieved from http://www.eurydice.org
Eurydice. (2012). The European higher area in 2012. Brussels, Belgium: Eurydice.
Finansministeriet, Undervisningsministeriet og KL. (2010). Specialundervisning i folkeskolen – veje til en bedre organisering og styring. København, Denmark: Rosendahls-Schultz Grafisk. Available at http://www.ft.dk/samling/20091/almdel/udu/bilag/244/859480/index.htm
Fuchs, D., & Fuchs, L. S. (2007). A model for implementing responsiveness to intervention. Teaching Exceptional Children, 39, 14–20.
Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L. S., & Stecker, P. M. (2010). The “blurring” of special education in a new continuum of general education placements and services. Exceptional Children, 76(3), 301–323.
Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., & Compton, D. L. (2012). The early prevention of mathematics difficulty its power and limitations. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 45(3), 257–269.
Gaber, S., Cankar, G., Umek, L. M., & Tasner, V. (2012). The danger of inadequate conceptualisation in PISA for education policy. A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 42(4), 647–663. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2012.658275
Glover, T. A., & Vaughn, S. (2010). The promise of response to intervention – Evaluating current science and practice. New York: The Gilford Press.
Guðjónsdóttir, H., Kristinsdóttir, J. V., & Óskarsdóttir, E. (2007). Mathematics for all: Preparing teachers to teach in inclusive classrooms. In L. Østergaard Johansen (Ed.), Mathematics teaching and inclusion. Proceedings of the 3rd Nordic research conference on special needs education in mathematics (pp. 123–136). Aalborg, Denmark: Aalborg University.
Guðjónsdóttir, H., Kristinsdóttir, J. V., & Óskarsdóttir, E. (2009). Mathematics for all: Working with teachers. In K. Linnanmäki & L. Gustafsson (Eds.), Different learners – different math? Proceedings of the 4th Nordic research conference on special needs education in mathematics (pp. 273–284). Vasa, Finland: Åbo Akademi University.
Guðjónsdóttir, H., Kristinsdóttir, J. V., & Óskarsdóttir, E. (2010). Teachers’ development in mathematics teaching through reflective discussions. In B. Sriraman, C. Bergsten, S. Goodchild, G. Pálsdóttir, B. D. Søndergaard, & L. Haapasalo (Eds.), The first sourcebook on Nordic research in mathematics education (pp. 487–494). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
Guðmundsson, E., & Arnkelsson, G. B. (1998). Talnalykill: staðal-og markbundið próf í stærðfræði 1.-7. bekkur/Einar Guðmundsson og Guðmundur B. Arnkelsson. Reykjavík, Iceland: Rannsóknastofnun uppeldis-og menntamála.
Guðmundsson, E., Skúlason, S., & Salvarsdóttir, K. (2006). WISC-IV is: mælifræði og túlkun. Reykjavík, Iceland: Námsmatsstofnun.
Halberda, J., Mazzocco, M., & Feigenson, L. (2008). Individual differences in nonverbal number acuity predict maths achievement. Nature, 455, 665–668.
Haug, P. (2010). Approaches to empirical research on inclusive education. Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research, 12(3), 199–209.
Haug, P. (2016). Ein likeverdig skule I framtida? Nordisk tidsskrift for pedagogikk og kritikk, 2, 64–77.
He, J., & Van de Vijver, F. J. (2016). The motivation-achievement paradox in international educational achievement tests: Toward a better understanding. In The psychology of Asian learners (pp. 253–268). Singapore, Singapore: Springer.
Helliwell, J. F., Layard, R., & Sachs, J. D. (Eds.). (2013). World happiness report 2013. New York: UN Sustainable Development Solutions Network.
KPMG International. (2013). http://www.kpmg.com/GLOBAL/EN/SERVICES/TAX/Pages/default.aspx
KSH. (2011). Klassifikation av sjukdomar och hälsoproblem (ICD-10-SE). Stockholm: Socialstyrelsen.
Lindenskov, L. (2012). Matematik i specialundervisning og andre særlige Foranstaltninger. København, Denmark: DPU.
Lindenskov, L., & Weng, P. (2014). Early mathematics intervention in a Danish municipality: Theory and teachers’ reflections in the pilot project. In A. B. Fuglestad (Ed.), Special needs education in mathematics: New trends, problems and possibilities (pp. 64–74). Kristianssand, Norway: Portal.
Mathisen, I. H., & Vedøy, G. (2012) Spesialundervisning – Drivere og dilemma: Rapport IRIS 2012/017. International Research Institute of Stavanger.
Mennta-og menningarmálaráðuneytið. (2013). Aðalnámskrá grunnskóla: greinasvið. Reykjavík, Iceland: Mennta-og menningarmálaráðuneyti. Retrieved 03.09.2013 from http://www.menntamalaraduneyti.is/utgefid-efni/namskrar/adalnamskra-grunnskola/
Ministry of Education (2013). Meld. St. 20 (2012–2013). På rett vei. Kvalitet og mangfold i fellesskolen.
Ministry of Education, Science and Culture. (2011). The Icelandic national curriculum guide for compulsory school: General section. Reykjavík, Iceland: Ministry of education, science and culture. Retrieved 03.09.2013 from http://www.menntamalaraduneyti.is/utgefid-efni/namskrar/adalnamskra-grunnskola/
Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Foy, P., & Arora, A. (2012). PIRLS 2011 international results in reading. Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College.
NESSE (2012). Education and disability/special needs: Policies and practices in education, training and employment for students with disabilities and special educational needs in the EU, an independent report prepared for the European Commission by the NESSE network of experts. As of 30 March 2013: http://www.nesse.fr/nesse/activities/reports/activities/reports/disability-specialneeds-1
Nielsen, J. (2013). Utredning i kontekst. Utredninger – i vor tid. Psykologi i Kommunen, (1), 39–48.
OECD. (2012). Education at a Glance 2012: OECD indicators. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/eag-2012-en
OECD. (2013a). PISA 2012 results: What students know and can do – Student performance in mathematics, reading and science (volume I). PISA, OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264201118-en
OECD. (2013b). OECD skills outlook 2013: First results from the survey of adult skills. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264204256-en
OECD. (2016). PISA 2015. Results in focus. OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisa-2015-results-in-focus.pdf [22.01.2018].
Ostad, S. (1997). Developmental differences in addition strategies: A comparison of mathematically disabled and mathematically normal children. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 67, 345–357.
Óskarsdóttir, E. (2011). Sérkennsla í stærðfræði: rannsókn á framkvæmd og skipulagi. Glæður, 21(1), 57–62.
Parsons, S., & Bynner, J. (2005). Does numeracy matter more? National Research and Development Centre for Adult Literacy and Numeracy. Available at http://www.nrdc.org.uk/download.asp?f=2979&e=pdf
Räsänen, P., & Koponen, T. (2011). Matemaattisten oppimisvaikeuksien neuropsykologisesta tutkimuksesta. NMI-Bulletin, 20(3), 39–53. [About neuropsychological research on mathematical disorders].
Räsänen, P., & Närhi, V. (2013). Heikkojen oppijoiden koulupolku. Teoksessa J Metsämuuronen (toim.), Perusopetuksen matematiikan oppimistulosten pitkittäisarviointi vuosina 2005–2012. Koulutuksen seurantaraportit 4/2013. Helsinki, Finland: Opetushallitus. (pp. 173–224) [Pathways to poor performance in mathematics. A book chapter in the report on the longitudinal study of the National Learning Assessment of Mathematical skills, National Board of Education].
Räsänen, P., Närhi, V., & Aunio, P. (2010). Matematiikassa heikosti suoriutuvat oppilaat perusopetuksen 6. luokan alussa. (ss. 165–203). Teoksessa EK Niemi & J Metsämuuronen (toim.) (2010). Miten matematiikan taidot kehittyvät? Matematiikan oppimistulokset peruskoulun viidennen vuosiluokan jälkeen vuonna 2008. Koulutuksen seurantaraportit 2/2010. Helsinki, Finland: Opetushallitus. [Book chapter: Students with a poor performance in mathematics at the beginning of the 6th grade, in a book on National learning outcome assessment, follow-up from third to sixth grade, National Board of Education].
Sabel, C., Saxenian, A., Miettinen, R., Kristensen, P., & Hautamäki, J. (2011). Individualized service provision in the new welfare state. Lessons from special education in Finland. Sitra Studies 62. Helsinki, Finland: SITRA.
SFI. (2013). Talblindhed – en forskningsoversigt. Copenhagen, Denmark: SFI.
Skolverket. (2009). What influences educational achievement in Swedish schools? A systematic review and summary analysis. Stockholm: Skolverket.
Skolverket. (2013). Ämnesproven 2012 i grundskolans årskurs 9 och specialskolans årskurs 10. Stockholm: Skolverket. Available at http://www.skolverket.se/bedomning/nationella-prov-bedomningsstod/grundskoleutbildning/bedomning-i-arskurs-7-9/amnesproven-i-arskurs-9/resultat-av-amnesproven-i-arskurs-9/amnesprov-i-arskurs-9
Sverrisson, F. A., & Skúlason, S. (2012). Skýrsla um samræmd könnunarpróf 2012. Available at http://www.namsmat.is/vefur/skyrslur/samramd_prof/skyrsl_samramd_2012/samr_2012_vefur.pdf
The Finnish Centre for Statistics (2013). Comprehensive school pupils receiving part-time special education in the academic year 2009–2010 by primary reason for special education. Available at http://www.stat.fi/til/erop/2010/erop_2010_2011-06-09_tau_005_en.html
Thuneberg, H., Hautamäki, J., Ahtiainen, R., Lintuvuori, M., Vainikainen, M.-P., & Hilasvuori, T. (2013). Conceptual change in adopting the nationwide special education strategy in Finland. Journal of Educational Change, 9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-013-9213-x
Tomas, M. (Ed.). (2009). Northern lights on PISA 2006. Differences and similarities in the Nordic countries. Copenhagen, Denmark: Nordic Council of Ministers. Available at http://www.norden.org/publications
UNESCO, the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation. (1994). Salamanca statement and framework for action on special needs education. Paris: UNESCO
WHO. (2005). International statistical classification of diseases and related health problems (ICD-10). Geneva, Switzerland: WHO.
World Bank. (2013). GDP per capita. Available at http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.PCAP.CD
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Räsänen, P. et al. (2019). Mathematical Learning and Its Difficulties: The Case of Nordic Countries. In: Fritz, A., Haase, V.G., Räsänen, P. (eds) International Handbook of Mathematical Learning Difficulties. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97148-3_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97148-3_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-97147-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-97148-3
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)