Abstract
There has been a continuous debate on different criteria on assessment of mathematical learning disability (MLD). Originally, MLD was defined as an unexpected failure to acquire basic mathematics skills despite normal intelligence, adequate schooling, and absence of neurological or psychiatric disorders. This approach, based on a discrepancy between the intelligence and the academic skills, has been largely criticized. One of the strongest candidates to replace this approach has been the response-to-intervention (RTI) instruction model, where the focus has been in the student’s learning in optimal learning conditions, for example, when participating in an evidence-based intervention program. However, the RTI approach does not sufficiently take into account the individual factors that affect the responsiveness to a mathematical intervention and does not have effective algorithms for differential diagnosis of specific MLD and low attainment in mathematics. Therefore, a third alternative in assessment has focused on cognitive patterns of strengths and weaknesses (PSW). The PSW model offers several theoretical and empirical advances to the previous models. However, there is also strong evidence supporting a view that severe forms of MLD would stem from a core deficit that is independent of the comorbid, but individually varying, cognitive disorders. The selected approach also has direct implications for educational policy and practice in classrooms.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Booth, J. L., & Siegler, R. S. (2008). Numerical magnitude representations influence arithmetic learning. Child Development, 79(4), 1016–1031.
Butterworth, B. (2003). Dyscalculia screener. London, England: NferNelson.
Butterworth, B., & Kovas, Y. (2013). Understanding neurocognitive developmental disorders can improve education for all. Science, 340(6130), 300–305. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1231022.
Butterworth, B., & Reigosa-Crespo, V. (2007). Information processing deficits in dyscalculia. In D. B. Berch & M. M. M. Mazzocco (Eds.), Why is math so hard for some children? The nature and origins of mathematical learning difficulties and disabilities (pp. 65–81). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
Butterworth, B., Varma, S., & Laurillard, D. (2011). Dyscalculia: From brain to education. Science, 332. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1201536.
Dolan, C. (2007). Mathematical development in children with specific language impairments. In D. B. Berch & M. M. M. Mazzocco (Eds.), Why is math so hard for some children? The nature and origins of mathematical learning difficulties and disabilities (pp. 151–172). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
Dubinsky, J. M. (2010). Neuroscience education for prekindergarten-12 teachers. The Journal of Neuroscience, 30(24), 8057–8060. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2322-10.2010.
Fletcher, J. M., Denton, C., & Francis, D. J. (2005). Validity of alternative approaches for the identification of learning disabilities: Operationalizing unexpected underachievement. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38(6), 545–552.
Fuchs, D., & Fuchs, L. S. (2006). Introduction to response to intervention: What, why, and how valid is it? Reading Research Quarterly, 41(1), 93–99.
Geary, D., & Hoard, M. (2005). Learning disabilities in arithmetic and mathematics: Theoretical and empirical perspectives. In J. I. D. Campbell (Ed.), Handbook of mathematical cognition (pp. 253–268). New York: Psychology Press.
Goswami, U. (2008). Foresight mental capital and wellbeing project. Learning difficulties: Future challenges. Retrieved from London.
Gross-Tsur, V., Manor, O., & Shalev, R. S. (1996). Developmental dyscalculia: Prevalence and demographic features. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 38(1), 25–33.
Halberda, J., Mazzocco, M. M. M., & Feigenson, L. (2008). Individual differences in nonverbal number acuity predict maths achievement. Nature, 455, 665–668.
Howard-Jones, P. A., Varma, S., Ansari, D., Butterworth, B., De Smedt, B., Goswami, U., et al. (2016). The principles and practices of educational neuroscience: Comment on bowers (2016). Psychological Review, 123(5), 620–627. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000036.
Hyde, D. C., Khanum, S., & Spelke, E. S. (2014). Brief nonsymbolic, approximate number practice enhances subsequent exact symbolic arithmetic in children. Cognition, 131, 92–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2013.12.007.
Kearns, D. M., & Fuchs, D. (2013). Does cognitively focused instruction improve the academic performance of low-achieving students? Exceptional Children, 79, 263–290.
Landerl, K., Bevan, A., & Butterworth, B. (2004). Developmental dyscalculia and basic numerical capacities: A study of 8 – 9-year-old students. Cognition, 93, 99–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2003.11.004.
Mastropieri, M. A., & Scruggs, T. E. (2002). Effective instruction for special education (3rd ed.). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
Mazzocco, M. M. M. (2007). Defining and differentiating mathematical learning disabilities and difficulties. In D. B. Berch & M. M. M. Mazzocco (Eds.), Why is math so hard for some children? The nature and origins of mathematical learning difficulties and disabilities (pp. 29–60). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
Monuteaux, M. C., Faraone, S. V., Herzig, K., Navsaria, N., & Biederman, J. (2005). ADHD and dyscalculia: Evidence for independent familial transmission. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38, 86–93.
Obersteiner, A., Reiss, K., & Ufer, S. (2013). How training on exact or approximate mental representations of number can enhance first-grade students’ basic number processing and arithmetic skills. Learning and Instruction, 23, 125–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2012.08.004.
Panel, L. D. A. O. A. L. E. (2014). Critical issues in response-to-intervention, comprehensive evaluation, and specific learning disabilities identification and intervention: An expert white paper consensus. Learning Disabilities: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 20(2), 61–72.
Pickering, S. J., & Howard-jones, P. (2007). Educators ’ views on the role of neuroscience in education: Findings from a study of UK and international perspectives. Mind, Brain, and Education, 1, 109–113.
Reeve, R., Reynolds, F., Humberstone, J., & Butterworth, B. (2012). Stability and change in markers of core numerical competencies. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 141(4), 649–666. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027520.
Reigosa-Crespo, V., González-Alemañy, E., León, T., Torres, R., Mosquera, R., & Valdés-Sosa, M. (2013). Numerical capacities as domain-specific predictors beyond the early mathematics learning: A longitudinal study. PLoS One.
Reigosa-Crespo, V., Valdes-Sosa, M., Butterworth, B., Estevez, N., Rodriguez, M., Santos, E., et al. (2012). Basic numerical capacities and prevalence of developmental dyscalculia: The Havana Survey. Developmental Psychology, 48(1), 123–135. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025356.
Stoiber, K. C., Gettinger, M. (2016). The science and practice of multi-tiered systems of support. In S. R. Jimerson, M. K. Burns, & A. M. VanDerHeyden (Eds), Handbook of response to intervention (2nd ed.) (pp. 121–141). Springer.
Santos, E., Reigosa-Crespo, V., García-Liashenko, K., Echemendía, A., Plasencia, E., Pujols, G., et al. (2015). A system to support regional screening programs to identify school-age children at risk of neurodevelopmental disorders. World Congress on Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Toronto, Canada Volume 51 of the series IFMBE Proceedings, pp 1469–1473.
Siegler, R. S., & Ramani, G. B. (2008). SPECIAL SECTION: THE DEVELOPMENT OF MATHEMATICAL playing linear numerical board games promotes low-income children’s numerical development. Developmental Science, 5, 655–661. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2008.00714.x.
UNESCO-IBE. (2016). Intentional ICT: Curriculum, education and development. Retrieved from Geneva, Switzerland.
Zirkel, P. A. (2013). The Hale position for a “third method” for specific learning disabilities identification: A legal analysis. Learning Disability Quarterly, 36(2), 93–96.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Reigosa-Crespo, V. (2019). Beyond the “Third Method” for the Assessment of Developmental Dyscalculia: Implications for Research and Practice. In: Fritz, A., Haase, V.G., Räsänen, P. (eds) International Handbook of Mathematical Learning Difficulties. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97148-3_45
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97148-3_45
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-97147-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-97148-3
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)