Skip to main content

Small Group Interventions for Children Aged 5–9 Years Old with Mathematical Learning Difficulties

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
International Handbook of Mathematical Learning Difficulties

Abstract

The research related to educational interventions for children with mathematical learning difficulties has been increasing steadily. In this chapter I focus on small group interventions for children aged 5–9 years old with learning difficulties in mathematics. First, I describe the important issues: (1) who are the children having problems in mathematics, (2) what do we mean with (special) education intervention, (3) what does Responsiveness to Intervention mean, and (4) what intervention features have been found effective for children aged 5–9 years with learning difficulties in mathematics. Then, I describe the research and developmental work that has been done in Finland on designing web services which provide evidence-based information and materials for educators. The two web services are LukiMat and ThinkMath. Together, these two web services include the knowledge base, assessment batteries and intervention tools to be used in relation to mathematical learning difficulties in the age group 5–9 years.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ansari, D. (2015). No more math wars – an evidence-based, developmental perspective on math education. Education Canada, Retrieved from www.cea-ace.ca.

  • Arnold, D. H., Fisher, P. H., Doctoroff, G. L., & Dobbs, J. (2002). Accelerating math development in head start classrooms. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(4), 762–770.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aunio, P. (2016). Finnish digital learning support for children with learning difficulties in mathematics. In H. Niemi & J. Jiyou (Eds.), New ways to teach and learn in China and Finland: Crossing boundaries with technology (pp. 136–149). New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aunio, P., Hautamäki, J., & Van Luit, J. E. H. (2005). Mathematical-thinking intervention programmes for preschool children with normal and low number sense. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 20, 131–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aunio, P., & Mononen, R. (2012a). Assessment of Mathematical Skills in the Second Grade. Unpublished. Helsinki, Finland: University of Helsinki.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aunio, P., & Mononen, R. (2012b). Assessment of Mathematical Skills in the First Grade. Unpublished. Helsinki, Finland: University of Helsinki.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aunio, P., & Mononen, R. (2012c). Assessment of Mathematical Skills in the Kindergarten. Unpublished. Helsinki, Finland: University of Helsinki.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aunio, P., Mononen, R., Ragpot, L., & Törmänen, M. (2016). Early numeracy performance of south African school beginners. South African Journal of Childhood Education, 6(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajce.v6i1.496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aunio, P., & Räsänen, P. (2015). Core numerical skills for learning mathematics in children aged five to eight years - a working model for educators. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 24, 684. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350293X.2014.996424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, S., Gersten, R., & Lee, D. (2002). A synthesis of empirical research on teaching mathematics to low-achieving students. The Elementary School Journal, 103, 51–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, M. A., Klein, A., Swank, P., Starkey, P., McClandliss, B., Flynn, K., et al. (2016). Effects of tutorial interventions in mathematics and attention for low-performing preschool children. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 9(4), 577–606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bracken, B. A. (2006). Bracken Basic Concept Scale-Third Edition: Receptive (BBCS-3:R). San Antonio, TX: Harcourt Assessment, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryant, D. P., Bryant, B. R., Gersten, R. M., Scammacca, N. N., & Chavez, M. M. (2008). Mathematics intervention for first- and second-grade students with mathematics difficulties: The effects of tier 2 intervention delivered as booster lessons. Remedial and Special Education, 29, 20–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cary, M.G., Clarke, B., Doabler, C., Smolkowski, K., Fien, H. & Baker, S. K., (2017). A practitioner implementation of a tier 2 first-grade mathematics intervention. Learning Disability Quaterly,

    Google Scholar 

  • Chodura, S., Kuhn, J.-T., & Holling, H. (2015). Interventions for children with mathematical difficulties. Zeitsschrift fur Psychologie, 223(2), 129–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, B. & Shinn, M. R. (2004) A preliminary investigation into the identification and development of early mathematics curriculum-based measurement. School Psychology Review, 33(2), 234–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, B., Doabler, C., Smolkowski, K., Kurtz Nelson, E., Fien, H., Baker, S. K., & Kosty, D. (2016). Testing the immediate and long-term efficacy of a tier 2 kindergarten mathematics intervention. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 9(4), 607–634.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, B., Dobler, C. T., Smolkowski, K., Baker, S. K., Fien, H., & Strand Cary, M. (2016). Examining the efficacy of a tier 2 kindergarten mathematics intervention. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 49(2), 152–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, B., Baker, S., Chard, D., & Otterstedt, J. (2006). Developing and validating measures of number sense to identify students at risk for mathematics disabilities (Technical Report 0307). Eugene, OR: Pacific Institutes for Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, B., Gersten, R. M., Dimino, J., & Rolfhus, E. (2011). Assessing student proficiency of number sense (ASPENS). Longmont, CO: Cambium Learning Group, Sopris Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, B., Smolkowski, K., Baker, S., Fien, H., Doabler, C. T., & Chard, D. J. (2011). The impact of comprehensive tier 1 core kindergarten program on the achievement of students at risk in mathematics. The Elementary School Journal, 111(4), 561–584.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clements, D. H., & Sarama, J. (2008). Experimental evaluation of the effects of a research-based preschool mathematics curriculum. American Educational Research Journal, 45(2), 443–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Codding, R. S., Burns, M. K., & Lukito, G. (2011). Meta-analysis of mathematic basic fact fluency interventions: A component analysis. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 26, 36–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Codding, R. S., Chan-Iannetta, L., Palmer, M., & Lukito, G. (2009). Examining a classwide application of cover-copy-compare with and without goal setting to enhance mathematics fluency. School Psychology Quarterly, 24(3), 173–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dennis, S. M., Sharp, E., Chovanes, J., Thomas, J., Burns, R. M., Custer, B., & Park, J. (2016). A meta-analysis of empirical research on teaching students with mathematics learning difficulties. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 31(3), 156–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doabler, C. T., Clarke, B., & Fien, H. (2012). ROOTS Assessment of Early Numeracy Skills (RAENS). Unpublished measurement instrument. Center on Teaching and Learning, University of Oregon. Eugene, OR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doabler, C. T., Clarke, B., Kosty, D. B., Kurtz-Nelson, E., Fien, H., Smolkowski, K., & Baker, S. K. (2016). Testing the efficacy of a tier 2 mathematics intervention: A conceptual replication study. Exceptional Children, 83(1), 92–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyson, N., Jordan, N. C., Beliakoff, A., & Hassinger-Das, B. (2015). A kindergarten number-sense intervention with contrasting practice condition for low-achieving children. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 46(3), 331–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyson, N. I., Jordan, N. C., & Glutting, J. (2011). A number sense intervention for low-income kindergartners at risks for mathematics difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 46(2), 166–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, U., Moeller, K., Cress, U., & Nuerk, H.-C. (2013). Interventions supporting children’s mathematics school success: A meta-analytic review. European Psychologist, 18(2), 89–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs, L. S., Compton, D. L., Fuchs, D., Hollenbeck, K. N., Craddock, C. F., & Hamlett, C. L. (2008). Dynamic assessment of algebraic learning in predicting third graders’ development of mathematical problem solving. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(4), 829–850.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs, L. S., Compton, D. L., Fuchs, D., Paulsen, K., Bryant, J. D., & Hamlett, C. L. (2005). The prevention, identification, and cognitive determinants of math difficulty. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(3), 493–513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., & Compton, D. L. (2012). Intervention effects for students with comorbid forms of learning disability: Understanding the needs of nonresponders. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 46(86), 534–548.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., & Schumacher, R. F. (2011). A two-tiered RTI system for improving word-problem performance among students at risk for mathematics difficulty. In R. Gersten & R. Newman-Conchar (Eds.), Understanding RTI in Mathematics – Proven methods and applications (pp. 85–108). Baltimore, MD: Paul Brookes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs, L., Hamlett, C., & Fuchs, D. (1990). Curriculum-based math computation and concepts/applications. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geary, D. C. (1993). Mathematical disabilities: Cognitive, neuropsychological, and genetic components. Psychological Bulletin, 114(2), 345–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geary, D. C. (2013). Learning disabilities in mathematics. Recent advances. In H. L. Swanson, K. R. Harris, & S. Graham (Eds.), Handbook of learning disabilities (2nd ed., pp. 239–255). New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gersten, R., Chard, D., Jayanthi, M., Baker, S. K., Morphy, P., & Flojo, J. (2009). Mathematics instruction for students with learning disabilities: A meta-analysis of instructional components. Review of Educational Research, 79(3), 1202–1242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gersten, R., Chard, D. J., Jayanthi, M., Baker, S. K., Morphy, P., & Flojo, J. (2008). Mathematics Instruction for students with learning disabilities or difficulty learning mathematics. A synthesis of the intervention research. Portsmouth, NH: RMC Research Corporation, Centre on Instruction.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gersten, R. M., Rolfhus, E., Clarke, B., Decker, L. E., Wilkins, C., & Dimino, J. (2015). Intervention for first graders with limited number knowledge: Large-scale replication of a randomized controlled trial. American Educational Research Journal, 52, 516–546. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831214565787

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ginsburg, H. & Baroody, A.J. (2003) TEMA-3 examiners manual. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallahan, D. P., Pullen, P. C., & Ward, D. (2013). A brief history of the field of learning disabilities. In H. L. Swanson, K. R. Harris, & S. Graham (Eds.), Handbook of learning disabilities (2nd ed., pp. 15–32). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassinger-Das, B., Jordan, N. C., & Dyson, N. (2015). Reading stories to learn math – Mathematics vocabulary instruction for children with early numeracy difficulties. The Elementary School Journal, 116(2), 242–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hotulainen, R., Mononen, R., & Aunio, P. (2012a). Assessment of thinking skills in the second grade. Unpublished. Helsinki, Finland: University of Helsinki.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hotulainen, R., Mononen, R., & Aunio, P. (2012b). Assessment of thinking skills in the first grade. Unpublished. Helsinki, Finland: University of Helsinki.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, J. H., Tzur, R., & Westenskow, A. (2016). Evolution of unit fraction conceptions in two fifth-graders with learning disability: An exploratory study. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 18(3), 182–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacob, R., & Parkinson, J. (2015). The potential for school-based interventions that target executive function to improve academic achievement: A review. Review of Educational Research, 85(4), 512–552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jimerson, S. R., Burns, M. K., & VanDerHeyden, A. M. (2007). Handbook of response to intervention. The science and practice of assessment and intervention. New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jitendra, A. K., Lein, A. E., Im, S.-h., Alghamdi, A. A., Hefte, S. B., & Mouanoutoua, J. (2018). Mathematical interventions for secondary students with learning disabilities and mathematics difficulties: A meta-analysis. Exceptional Children, 84(2), 177–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, N., Glutting, J. & Ramineni, C. (2008) A number sense assessment tool for indetifying children at risk for mathematical difficulties, pp 46–58. In Dowker, A. (Ed.) Mathematical Difficultie – Psychology and Intervention. Academic Press, Elsevier. San Diego, CA.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Jordan N. C. & Montani T. O. (1997) Cognitive arithmetic and problem solving: A comparison of children with specific and general mathematics difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 0(6):624–634.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jordan N.C., Glutting J, Ramineni C., & Watkins M.W. (2010) Validating a number sense screening tool for use in kindergarten and first grade: Prediction of mathematics proficiency in third grade. School Psychology Review, 39(2):181–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, N. C., Kaplan, D., Locuniak, M. N., & Ramineni, C. (2007). Predicting firstgrade math achievement from developmental number sense trajectories. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 22(1), 36–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kajamies, A., Poskiparta, E., Annevirta, T., Dufva, M., & Vauras, M. (2003). YTTE Luetun ja kuullun ymmärtäminen ja lukemisen sujuvuuden arviointi (assessment of reading and listening comprehension and reading fluency). Turku, Finland: University of Turku, Oppimistutkimuskeskus OTUK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, A., Starkey, P., Clements, D., Sarama, J., & Iyer, R. (2008). Effects of a pre-kindergarten mathematics intervention: A randomized experiment. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 1(3), 155–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kroesbergen, E. H., & Van Luit, J. E. H. (2003). Mathematics interventions for children with special educational needs. A meta-analysis. Remedial and Special Education, 24(2), 97–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kucian, K., Grond, U., Rotzer, S., Henzi, B., Schönmann, C., et al. (2011). Mental number line training in children with developmental dyscalculia. NeuroImage, 57(3), 782–795.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kunsch, C. A., Jitendra, A. K., & Sood, S. (2007). The effects of peer-mediated instruction in mathematics for students with learning problems: A research synthesis. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 22(1), 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levine S. C, Huttenlocher J., Taylor A., & Langrock A. (1999) Early sex differences in spatial skill. Developmental Psychology, 35(4):940–949.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindeman, J. (2005). ALLU: Ala-asteen Lukutesti: Käyttäjän käsikirja [ALLU: Reading test for primary grades: User’s manual]. Turku, Finland: University of Finland, Centre of Learning Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maccini, P., Mulcahy, C. A., & Wilson, M. G. (2007). A follow-up of mathematics interventions for secondary students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities, Research and Practice, 22(1), 58–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazzocco, M. M. M. (2009). Defining and differentiating mathematical learning disabilities and difficulties. In M. M. M. Mazzocco & D. B. Berch (Eds.), Why is math so hard for some children? The nature and origins of mathematical learning difficulties and disabilities (pp. 29–48). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mercer, N., & Sams, C. (2006). Teaching children how to use language to solve maths problems. Language and Education, 20(6), 507–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, S. P., Butler, F. M., & Lee, K. (1998). Validated practices for teaching mathematics to students with learning disabilities: A review of literature. Focus on Exceptional Children, 31(1), 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mononen, R. (2014). Early mathematics interventions - supporting young children with low performance in mathematics. PhD-dissertation. Finland: University of Helsinki.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mononen, R., & Aunio, P. (2012a). Improving mathematics skill in the second grade. An intervention program. Unpublished. Helsinki, Finland: University of Helsinki.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mononen, R., & Aunio, P. (2012b). Improving mathematics skill in the first grade. An intervention program. Unpublished. Helsinki, Finland: University of Helsinki.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mononen, R., & Aunio, P. (2012c). Improving mathematics skill in the kindergarten. An intervention program. Unpublished. Helsinki, Finland: University of Helsinki.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mononen, R., & Aunio, P. (2014). A mathematics intervention for low-performing Finnish second graders: Findings from a pilot study. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 29(4), 457–473. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2014.922794

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mononen, R., & Aunio, P. (2016). Math intervention for low-performing first graders. South African Journal of Childhood Education, 6(1), a407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mononen, R., Aunio, P., Koponen, T., & Aro, M. (2014). A review of early numeracy interventions: Effectiveness and pedagogical implementation. International Journal of Early Childhood Special Education, 6(1), 25–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mononen, R., Aunio, P. & Leijo, S. Matemaattisten taitojen harjoittelun vaikutukset matematiikan taidoiltaan heikkojen esiopetusikäisten lasten osaamiseen (The effects of mathematical intervention on low performing children’s performance in kindergarten). In revision.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mononen, R., Tapola, A. & Aunio, P. (2015). Intensified mathematical support for low performing kindergarteners. Paper presentation in symposium. Conference of European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction., Limassol, Cyprus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moran, A. S., Swanson, H. L., Gerber, M. M., & Fung, W. (2014). The effects of paraphrasing interventions on problem solving accuracy for children at risk for math disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 29(3), 97–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moser Opitz, E., Freesemann, O., Prediger, S., Grob, U., Matull, I., & Hasmann, S. (2016). Remediation for students with mathematics difficulties: An intervention study in middle schools. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • National core curriculum for basic education (2014/2016). Finnish National Board of Education. Helsinki, Finland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Okamoto, Y., & Case, R. (1996). Exploring the microstructure of children’s central conceptual structures in the domain of number. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 61(1–2), 27–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfannenstiel, K. H., Bryant, D. P., Bryant, B., & Porterfield, J. A. (2015). Cognitive strategy instruction for teaching word problems to primary-level struggling students. Intervention in School and Clinic, 50(5), 291–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powell, S. R., Fuchs, L. S., Cirino, P. T., Fuchs, D., Compton, D. L., & Changas, P. C. (2015). Effects of a multitier support system on calculation, word problem and prealgebraic performance among at-risk learners. Exceptional Children, 81(4), 443–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramani, G.B. & Sigler, R.S. (2008) Promoting broad and stable improvements in low-income children’s numerical knowledge through playing number board games. Child Development, 79(82), 375–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Räsänen, P., Salminen, J., Wilson, A., Aunio, P., & Dehaene, S. (2009). Computer-assisted intervention for early number skills in children with low numeracy: A short review and a randomized controlled trial. Cognitive Development, 24(4), 450–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riccomini, P. J., & Smith, G. W. (2011). Introduction of response to intervention in mathematics. In R. Gersten & R. Newman-Gonchar (Eds.), Understanding RTI in Mathematics – Proven Methods and Applications (pp. 1–16). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riley-Tillman, T. C., & Burns, M. K. (2009). Evaluating educational interventions: Single-case Design for Measuring Response to intervention. New York, NY: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salminen, J. B., Koponen, T. K., Leskinen, M., Poikkeus, A.-M., & Aro, M. (2015). Individual variance in responsiveness to early computerized mathematics intervention. Learning and Individual Differences, 43, 124–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharp, E., & Dennis, M. S. (2017). Model drawing strategy for fraction word problem solving of fourth-grade students with learning disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 38(3), 181–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siegler, R. S., & Ramani, G. B. (2009). Playing linear board games – But not circular ones – Improves low-income preschoolers’ numerical understanding. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(3), 545–560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slavin, R. E., & Lake, C. (2008). Effective programs in elementary mathematics: A best-evidence synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 78(3), 427–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Starkey, P., Klein, A., & Wakeley, A. (2004). Enhancing young children’s mathematical knowledge through a pre-kindergarten mathematics intervention. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 19(1), 99–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swanson, H. L., Hoskyn, M., & Lee, C. (1999). Interventions for students with learning disabilities: A meta-analysis of treatment outcomes. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swanson, J., Schuck, S. Mann, M., Carlson, C., Hartman, K. & Sergeant, J. (2006) Categorical and dimensional definitions and evaluations of symptoms of ADHD: The SNAP and SWAN rating scales. Irvine, CA: University of California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toll, S. W. M., & Van Luit, J. E. H. (2012). Early numeracy intervention for low-performing kindergartners. Journal of Early Intervention, 34(4), 243–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toll, S. W. M., & Van Luit, J. E. H. (2014). Effects of remedial numeracy instruction throughout kindergarten starting at different ages. Evidence from a large-scale longitudinal study. Learning and Instruction, 33, 39–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Luit, J. E. H.; Van de Rijt, B. A. M. & Aunio, P. (2006). Lukukäsitetesti. (Early Numeracy Test) Psykologien kustannus Oy, Helsinki, Finland

    Google Scholar 

  • Westerholm, A. & Aunio, P. (submitted). Maahanmuuttajataustaisten lasten varhaisten matemaattisten taitojen interventiotutkimus (ThinkMath-intervention for Finnish as a Second Language kindergarteners).

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodcock, R.W., McGrew, K.S., & Mather, N. (2007) Woodcock-Johnson tests of achievement. Itasca, IL: Riverside Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wechsler, D. (2002) Wechsler preschool and primary scale of intelligence. 3. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xin, Y. P., & Jitendra, A. K. (1999). The effects of instruction in solving mathematical word problems for students with learning problems: A meta-analysis. The Journal of Special Education, 32(4), 207–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xin, Y. P., Tzur, R., Hord, C., Liu, J., Par, J. Y., & Si, L. (2017). An intelligent tutor-assisted mathematics intervention program for students with learning difficulties. Learning Disability Quaterly, 40(1), 4–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, D., & Xin, Y. P. (2012). A follow-up meta-analysis for word-problem-solving interventions for students with mathematics difficulties. The Journal of Educational Research, 105(5), 303–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pirjo Aunio .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Aunio, P. (2019). Small Group Interventions for Children Aged 5–9 Years Old with Mathematical Learning Difficulties. In: Fritz, A., Haase, V.G., Räsänen, P. (eds) International Handbook of Mathematical Learning Difficulties. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97148-3_41

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97148-3_41

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-97147-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-97148-3

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics