Counting and Basic Numerical Skills

  • Emily SlusserEmail author


The following chapter outlines a typical developmental trajectory of children’s early number knowledge and counting skills. Using a series of anecdotal demonstrations of a young child’s emergent knowledge as a guide, the chapter first outlines the conceptual and procedural building blocks for counting and basic numerical skills, proceeds to an extended discussion of major conceptual achievements in counting, and concludes with a review of our emerging understanding on how to best support and facilitate the development of these skills. Throughout each of these sections, seminal studies are discussed to more clearly demonstrate the role of children’s intuitive number sense in the construction of natural-number concepts, specific challenges that children confront as they acquire the verbal count list (including several conceptual and linguistic obstacles that are often overlooked in early childhood curricula and assessments), and the effectiveness of low-cost, practical interventions that can be adopted by educators and parents to support and facilitate development.


Counting Cardinality Number words Knower levels Approximate number Subitizing Quantification Acquisition 


  1. Arnold, D. H., Fisher, P. H., Doctoroff, G. L., & Dobbs, J. (2002). Accelerating math development in head start classrooms. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 762–770.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aunio, P., & Niemivirta, M. (2010). Predicting children’s mathematical performance in grade one by early numeracy. Learning and Individual Differences, 20, 427–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barner, D., Thalwitz, D., Wood, J., & Carey, S. (2007). On the relation between the acquisition of singular-plural morpho-syntax and the conceptual distinction between one and more than one. Developmental Science, 10, 365–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bartelet, D., Vaessen, A., Blomert, L., & Ansari, D. (2014). What basic number processing measures in kindergarten explain unique variability in first-grade arithmetic proficiency? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 117, 12–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Berkowitz, T., Schaeffer, M. W., Maloney, E. A., Peterson, L., Gregor, C., Levine, S. C., & Beilock, S. L. (2015). Math at home adds up to achievement in school. Science, 350, 196–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bloom, P., & Wynn, K. (1997). Linguistic cues in the acquisition of number words. Journal of Child Language, 24, 511–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carey, S. (2010). The origin of concepts. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Carey, S., Shusterman, A., Haward, P., & Distefano, R. (2017). Do analog number representations underlie the meanings of young children’s verbal numbers? Cognition, 168, 243–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chu, F., van Marle, K., & Geary, D. (2015). Early numerical foundations of young children’s mathematical development. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 132, 205–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Clearfield, M. W., & Mix, K. S. (1999). Number versus contour length in infants’ discrimination of small visual sets. Psychological Science, 10, 408–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cordes, S., Gelman, R., Gallistel, C. R., & Whalen, J. (2001). Variability signatures distinguish verbal from nonverbal counting for both large and small numbers. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 698–707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dale, P. S., & Fenson, L. (1996). Lexical development norms for young children. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 28, 125–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dantzig, T. (1967). Number: The language of science. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  14. Davidson, K., Eng, K., & Barner, D. (2012). Does learning to count involve a semantic induction? Cognition, 123, 162–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dehaene, S. (2011). The number sense: How the mind creates mathematics. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Dowker, A. (2008). Individual differences in numerical abilities in preschoolers. Developmental Science, 11, 650–654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Duncan, G. J., Dowsett, C. J., Claessens, A., Magnuson, K., Huston, A. C., Klebanov, P., et al. (2007). School readiness and later achievement. Developmental Psychology, 43, 1428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Feigenson, L., & Carey, S. (2003). Tracking individuals via object files: Evidence from infants’ manual search. Developmental Science, 6, 568–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Feigenson, L., Dehaene, S., & Spelke, E. S. (2004). Core systems of number. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 307–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Frank, M. C., Everett, D. L., Fedorenko, E., & Gibson, E. (2008). Number as a cognitive technology: Evidence from Pirahã language and cognition. Cognition, 108, 819–824.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fuson, K. C. (1988). Children’s counting and concepts of number. New York: Springer Science & Business Media.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gelman, R., & Gallistel, C. (1978). Young Children’s understanding of numbers. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Gersten, R., & Chard, D. (1999). Number sense: Rethinking arithmetic instruction for students with mathematical disabilities. The Journal of Special Education, 33, 18–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ginsburg, H., & Baroody, A. (2003). Test of early math ability (3rd ed.). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.Google Scholar
  25. Göbel, S. M., Watson, S. E., Lervåg, A., & Hulme, C. (2014). Children’s arithmetic development: It is number knowledge, not the approximate number sense, that counts. Psychological Science, 1–10.Google Scholar
  26. Goldman, M. C., Negen, J., & Sarnecka, B. W. (2014). Are bilingual children better at ignoring perceptually misleading information? A novel test. Developmental Science, 17, 956–964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Greenes, C., Ginsburg, H. P., & Balfanz, R. (2004). Big math for little kids. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 19, 159–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gunderson, E. A., & Levine, S. C. (2011). Some types of parent number talk count more than others: Relations between parents’ input and children’s cardinal-number knowledge. Developmental Science, 14, 1021–1032.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Halberda, J., & Feigenson, L. (2008). Developmental change in the acuity of the number sense: The approximate number system in 3-, 4-, 5-, and 6-year-olds and adults. Developmental Psychology, 44, 1457–1465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Halberda, J., Ly, R., Wilmer, J., Naiman, D., & Germine, L. (2012). Number sense across the lifespan as revealed by massive internet-based sample. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109, 11116–11120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Halberda, J., Mazzocco, M. M., & Feigenson, L. (2008). Individual differences in non-verbal number acuity correlate with maths achievement. Nature, 455, 665–668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hespos, S. J., Ferry, A., & Rips, L. (2009). Five-month-old infants have different expectations for solids and substances. Psychological Science, 20, 603–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Huang, Y. T., Spelke, E., & Snedeker, J. (2010). When is four far more than three? Children’s generalization of newly acquired number words. Psychological Science, 21, 600–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Jordan, N. C., Kaplan, D., Ramineni, C., & Locuniak, M. N. (2009). Early math matters: Kindergarten number competence and later mathematics outcomes. Developmental Psychology, 45, 850.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Jordan, N. C., & Levine, S. C. (2009). Socioeconomic variation, number competence, and mathematics learning difficulties in young children. Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews, 15, 60–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kaufman, E. L., Lord, M. W., Reese, T. W., & Volkmann, J. (1949). The discrimination of visual number. The American Journal of Psychology, 62, 498–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kritzer, K. L. (2009). Barely started and already left behind: A descriptive analysis of the mathematics ability demonstrated by young deaf children. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 1–13.Google Scholar
  38. Le Corre, M., Van de Walle, G., Brannon, E. M., & Carey, S. (2006). Re-visiting the competence/performance debate in the acquisition of the counting principles. Cognitive Psychology, 52, 130–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Levine, S. C., Suriyakham, L. W., Rowe, M. L., Huttenlocher, J., & Gunderson, E. A. (2010). What counts in the development of young children’s number knowledge? Developmental Psychology, 46, 1309–1319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Li, P., Le Corre, M., Shui, R., Jia, G., & Carey, S. (2003). Effects of plural syntax on number word learning: A cross-linguistic study. In Proceedings of the 28th Boston University Conference on Language Development. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
  41. Libertus, M., Feigenson, L., & Halberda, J. (2011). Preschool acuity of the approximate number system correlates with school math ability. Developmental Science, 14, 1292–1300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Libertus, M., Odic, D., & Halberda, J. (2012). Intuitive sense of number correlates with math scores on college-entrance examination. Acta Psychologica, 141, 373–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lipton, J. S., & Spelke, E. S. (2003). Origins of number sense: Large number discrimination in human infants. Psychological Science, 15, 396–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lyons, I. M., & Beilock, S. L. (2011). Numerical ordering ability mediates the relation between number-sense and arithmetic competence. Cognition, 121, 256–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Mandler, G., & Shebo, B. J. (1982). Subitizing: An analysis of its component processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 111, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Mix, K., Huttenlocher, J., & Levine, S. (2002). Quantitative development in infancy and early childhood. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Mix, K., Sandhofer, C., Moore, J., & Russell, C. (2012). Acquisition of the cardinal word principle: The role of input. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 27, 274–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Muldoon, K., Lewis, C., & Freeman, N. (2009). Why set-comparison is vital in early number learning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13, 203–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Odic, D., Libertus, M., Feigenson, L., & Halberda, J. (2013). Developmental change in the acuity of approximate number and area representations. Developmental Psychology, 49, 1103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Paliwal, V., & Baroody, A. (2017). How best to teach the cardinality principle? Paper presented at the American Education Research Association, San Antonio, TX.Google Scholar
  51. Piazza, M., Pica, P., Izard, V., Spelke, E., & Dehaene, S. (2013). Education enhances the acuity of the nonverbal approximate number system. Psychological Science, 24, 1037–1043.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Sarnecka, B., Goldman, M., & Slusser, E. (2014). How counting forms the basis for children’s first representations of the natural numbers. In R. Cohen Kadosh & A. Dowker (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of numerical cognition (pp. 291–309). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  53. Sarnecka, B. W., & Carey, S. (2008). How counting represents number: What children must learn and when they learn it. Cognition, 108, 662–674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Sarnecka, B. W., & Gelman, S. A. (2004). Six does not just mean a lot: Preschoolers see number words as specific. Cognition, 92, 329–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Sarnecka, B. W., Kamenskaya, V., Yamana, Y., Ogura, T., & Yudovina, Y. (2007). From grammatical number to exact numbers: Early meanings of ‘one’, ‘two’, and ‘three’ in English, Russian, and Japanese. Cognitive Psychology, 55, 136–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Sarnecka, B. W., & Lee, M. D. (2009). Levels of number knowledge in early childhood. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 103, 325–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Sarnecka, B. W., & Wright, C. E. (2013). The exact-numbers idea: Children’s understanding of cardinality and equinumerosity. Cognitive Science, 37, 1493–1506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Shusterman, A., Slusser, E., Halberda, J., & Odic, D. (2016). Acquisition of the cardinal principle coincides with improvement in approximate number system acuity in preschoolers. PLoS One, 11, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Siegler, R. S., & Ramani, G. B. (2008). Playing linear numerical board games promotes low-income children’s numerical development. Developmental Science, 11, 655–661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Slusser, E. (2010). The development of number concepts: Discrete quantification and numerosity. (Doctoral dissertation). University of California, Irvine, CA.Google Scholar
  61. Slusser, E., Chase, E., Berkowitz, T., George, E., Swee, M., Cho, D., Barth, H., et al. (2013). The power of play: Promoting preschoolers’ social and numerical development through independent play with toys. Poster presented at the Biennial Meeting for the Society for Research in Child Development, Seattle, WA.Google Scholar
  62. Slusser, E., Ditta, A., & Sarnecka, B. (2013). Connecting numbers to discrete quantification: A step in the child’s construction of integer concepts. Cognition, 129, 31–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Ribner, A., Shusterman, A., & Slusser, E. (2015). Preschool indicators of primary school math ability. Poster presented at the Biennial Meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Philadelphia, PA.Google Scholar
  64. Slusser, E., & Sarnecka, B. (2011). A picture of eight turtles: The child’s understanding of cardinality and numerosity. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 110, 38–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Slusser, E., Stoop, T., Lo, A., & Shusterman, A. (2017). Children’s use of newly acquired number words in novel contexts. Poster presented at the Biennial Meeting for the Society for Research in Child Development, Austin, TX.Google Scholar
  66. Spaepen, E., Coppola, M., Spelke, E., Carey, S., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2011). Number without a language model. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108, 3163–3168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Starkey, P., & Cooper, R. G. (1980). Perception of numbers by human infants. Science, 28, 1033–1035.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Starkey, P., Klein, A., & Wakeley, A. (2004). Enhancing young children’s mathematical knowledge through a pre-kindergarten mathematics intervention. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 19, 99–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Tosto, M. G., Petrill, S. A., Halberda, J., Trzaskowski, M., Tikhomirova, T. N., Bogdanova, O. Y., et al. (2014). Why do we differ in number sense? Evidence from a genetically sensitive investigation. Intelligence, 43, 35–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Trick, L., & Pylyshyn, Z. (1993). Why are small and large numbers enumerated differently? A limited-capacity preattentive stage in vision. Psychological Review, 101, 80–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. van Marle, K., Chu, F. W., Li, Y., & Geary, D. C. (2014). Acuity of the approximate number system and preschoolers’ quantitative development. Developmental Science, 17, 492–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Wagner, J. B., & Johnson, S. C. (2011). An association between understanding cardinality and analog magnitude representations in preschoolers. Cognition, 119, 10–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Wang, H., Odic, D., Halberda, J., & Feigenson, L. (2016). Changing the precision of preschoolers’ approximate number system representations changes their symbolic math performance. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 147, 82–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Wynn, K. (1990). Children’s understanding of counting. Cognition, 36, 155–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Wynn, K. (1992). Children’s acquisition of the number words and the counting system. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 220–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Wynn, K. (1996). Infants’ individuation and enumeration of actions. Psychological Science, 7, 165–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Xu, F. (2003). Numerosity discrimination in infants: Evidence for two systems of representations. Cognition, 89, B15–B25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Xu, F., & Spelke, E. S. (2000). Large number discrimination in 6-month old infants. Cognition, 74, B1–B11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Child & Adolescent DevelopmentSan José State UniversitySan JoseUSA

Personalised recommendations