Advertisement

Ethically Significant Moments in Stirring up Memories

  • Claudia MitchellEmail author
  • Sifiso Magubane
  • Casey Burkholder
  • Sheeren Saloojee
Chapter
Part of the Studies in Arts-Based Educational Research book series (SABER, volume 2)

Abstract

“Ethically Significant Moments in Stirring Up Memories” by Claudia Mitchell, Sifiso Magubane, Casey Burkholder, and Sheeren Saloojee, points to the issue of ethics in artful engagement as an area that is under-explored in memory-work and self-study. Sifiso Magubane, a South African teacher-researcher, considers the emotional challenges in getting permission to use the photograph of a close friend of his who has died. Casey Burkholder, studying at a Canadian university, considers some of the tensions in preservice teachers producing cellphilms about their own personal histories and, especially, the politics of exclusion. Finally, Sheeren Saloojee, who is completing a doctoral study at a South African university, addresses an issue seldom discussed in relation to vulnerability in social research—that of the emotional well-being of the researcher, especially in relation to what it means to carry around and represent the stories of the participants. The three mosaic pieces highlight situational ethics and ethics of the personal, both aspects of “doing most good” and “doing least harm” that rarely appear in any guide or any ethics policy.

Keywords

Arts-based research Canada Cellphilms Ethics Interviews Memory-work Photographs South Africa Teacher professional learning 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to our reviewer, Lungile Masinga of the University of KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.

References

  1. Barnbaum, D. R., & Byron, M. (2001). Research ethics: Text and readings. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  2. Boyce, C., & Neale, P. (2006). Conducting in-depth interviews for evaluation input. Watertown: Pathfinder International.Google Scholar
  3. Burkholder, C. (2016). We are HK too: Disseminating cellphilms in a participatory archive. In K. MacEntee, C. Burkholder, & J. Schwab-Cartas (Eds.), What’s a cellphilm? Integrating mobile technology into participatory visual research and activism (pp. 153–168). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  4. Conrad, M., Ercikan, K., Friesen, G., Létourneau, J., Muise, D., Northrup, D., et al. (2013). Canadians and their pasts. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  5. DeVault, M. L. (1996). Liberating method. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Dockney, J., & Tomaselli, K. G. (2009). Fit for the small(er) screen: Films, mobile TV and the new individual television experience. Journal of African Cinema, 1(1), 126–132.Google Scholar
  7. Finch, J. (1984). It’s great to have someone to talk to: The ethics and politics of interviewing women. London: RKP.Google Scholar
  8. Flicker, S., O’Campo, P., Monchalin, R., Thistle, J., Worthington, C., Masching, R., et al. (2015). Research done in “A good way”: The importance of Indigenous elder involvement in HIV community-based research. American Journal of Public Health, 105(6), 1149–1154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Griffin, M. G., Resick, P. A., Waldrop, A. E., & Mechanic, M. B. (2003). Participation in trauma research: Is there evidence of harm? Journal of Traumatic Stress, 16(3), 221–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hawton, K., Houston, K., Malmberg, A., & Simkin, S. (2003). Psychological autopsy interviews in suicide research: The reactions of informants. Archives of Suicide Research, 7, 73–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Herman, J. L. (1992). Trauma and recovery. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  12. Jorm, A. F., Kelly, C. M., & Morgan, A. J. (2007). Participant distress in psychiatric research: A systematic review. Psychological Medicine, 37, 917–926.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lee, M. K. O., Cheung, C. M. K., & Chen, Z. (2005). Acceptance of Internet-based learning medium: The role of extrinsic and intrinsic motivation. Information & Management, 42(2005), 1095–1104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Limerick, B., Burgess-Limerick, T., & Grace, M. (1996). The politics of interviewing: Power relations and accepting the gift. Qualitative Studies in Education, 9(4), 449–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. MacEntee, K., Burkholder, C., & Schwab-Cartas, J. (2016). What’s a cellphilm? Integrating mobile technology into participatory visual research and activism. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  16. Magubane, S. E. (2014). Cultivating intrinsic motivation for learning technology: A teacher’s self-study (Unpublished master’s thesis). University of KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Retrieved from http://researchspace.ukzn.ac.za/handle/10413/12883.
  17. Masinga, L. (2012). Journeys to self-knowledge: Methodological reflections on using memory-work in a participatory study of teachers as sexuality educators. Journal of Education, 54, 121–137.Google Scholar
  18. McCormick, M. (2012). Feminist research ethics, informed consent, and potential harms. The Hilltop Review, 6(1), Article 5. Retrieved from http://scholarworks.wmich.edu/hilltopreview/vol6/iss1/5.
  19. Mitchell, C., & de Lange, N. (2013). What can a teacher do with a cellphone? Using participatory visual research to speak back in addressing HIV&AIDS. South African Journal of Education, 33(4), 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mitchell, C., Weber, S., & Pithouse, K. (2009). Facing the public: Using photography for self-study and social action. In D. Tidwell, M. Heston, & L. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Research methods for the self-study of practice (pp. 119–134). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Oakley, Ann. (1981). Interviewing women: A contradiction in terms. In H. Roberts (Ed.), Doing feminist research. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  22. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (3rd ed.). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  23. Posel, D., & Ross, F. C. (2012). Opening up the quandaries of research ethics: Beyond the formalities of institutional ethical review. In D. Posel & F. C. Ross (Eds.), Ethical quandaries in social research (pp. 1–26). Cape Town: HSRC Press.Google Scholar
  24. Saloojee, S. (2017). Exploring educational experiences of African postgraduate women students at UKZN: A narrative inquiry (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.Google Scholar
  25. Samaras, A. P. (2011). Self-study teacher research: Improving your practice through collaborative inquiry. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  26. Schwab-Cartas, J. (2012). Learning from communities: Personal reflections from inside. In E-J. Milne, C. Mitchell, & N. de Lange (Eds.), Handbook of participatory video (pp. 383–396). Plymouth: AltaMira.Google Scholar
  27. Smeal, E. (1984). Why and how women will elect the next president. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  28. Strong-Wilson, T., Mitchell, C., Morrison, C., Radford, L., & Pithouse-Morgan, K. (2014). Looking forward through looking back: Using digital-memory-work in teaching for transformation. In L. Thomas (Ed.), Becoming a teacher: Sites for teacher development in Canadian teacher education (pp. 442–468). Ottawa: CATE.Google Scholar
  29. Strong-Wilson, T., Mitchell, C., & Ingersoll, M. (2016). Exploring multidirectional memory-work and the digital as a phase space for teacher professional development. In M. Knoebel & J. Kalman (Eds.), New literacies and teachers’ professional development (pp. 151–172). New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Claudia Mitchell
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Sifiso Magubane
    • 2
  • Casey Burkholder
    • 3
  • Sheeren Saloojee
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Integrated Studies in EducationMcGill UniversityMontrealCanada
  2. 2.School of EducationUniversity of KwaZulu-NatalDurbanSouth Africa
  3. 3.Faculty of EducationUniversity of New BrunswickFrederictonCanada

Personalised recommendations