Skip to main content

roboterfabrik: A Pilot to Link and Unify German Robotics Education to Match Industrial and Societal Demands

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Robotics in Education (RiE 2018)

Abstract

In this paper we introduce a novel robotics education concept entitled roboterfabrik. This approach is already implemented as a pilot project in the German educational system. Overall, we promote establishing the first generation of robotic natives. For this we need to provide both practical and theoretical experience in robotics to young people and give them access to state-of-the art, high performance yet affordable industrial robotic technology. Specifically, our approach systematically connects different existing school types, universities as well as companies. It comprises specialized lectures at the university, certified workshops and Robothons which are derived from the hackathon concept, and modified to the demand of roboticists.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    “roboterfabrik” is the literal German translation for “robot factory”. More information can be found on the project website https://www.roboterfabrik.uni-hannover.de.

  2. 2.

    Science, technology, engineering and mathematics.

  3. 3.

    Further impressions of various events and Robothons can be found at https://www.roboterfabrik.uni-hannover.de.

References

  1. Arras, K.O., Cerqui, D.: Do we want to share our lives and bodies with robots? a 2000 people survey. Technical report (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chollet, F., et al.: Keras (2015). https://github.com/fchollet/keras. Accessed 15 Sept 2017

  3. Deutscher Industrie- und Handelskammertag: Education and training (2017). https://www.dihk.de/en/segments/training/education-training. Accessed 15 Sept 2017

  4. Eguchi, A.: Robotics as a learning tool for educational transformation. In: Proceeding of 4th International Workshop Teaching Robotics, Teaching with Robotics and 5th International Conference Robotics in Education, Padova, Italy, pp. 27–34 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Enz, S., Diruf, M., Spielhagen, C., Zoll, C., Vargas, P.A.: The social role of robots in the future—explorative measurement of hopes and fears. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 3(3), 263 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Esposito, J.: The state of robotics education: proposed goals for positively transforming robotics education at postsecondary institutions. IEEE Robot. Autom. Mag. 24, 157–164 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Franka Emika GmbH: FRANKA EMIKA (2017). https://www.franka.de/. Accessed 21 Aug 2017

  8. Frey, C.B., Osborne, M.A.: The future of employment: how susceptible are jobs to computerisation? Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 114, 254–280 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. German Federal Ministry of Education and Research: Service-Roboter statt Pflegeheim (results from representative phone interviews) (2016). https://www.bmbf.de/de/service-roboter-statt-pflegeheim-2727.html. Accessed 14 Sept 2017

  10. Guizzo, E.: How to get students excited about engineering? Bring in the robots (review about a summer camp at GRASP lab) (2007). http://spectrum.ieee.org/automaton/robotics/robotics-software/how_to_get_students_excited_ab. Accessed 29 Aug 2017

  11. Haase, B.: Hannover soll führender Robotikstandort werden (2015). http://www.haz.de/Hannover/Aus-der-Stadt/Uebersicht/Hannover-soll-fuehrender-Robotikstandort-werden. Accessed 29 Aug 2017

  12. Haddadin, S., Johannsmeier, L., Becker, M., Schappler, M., Lilge, T., Haddadin, S., Schmid, J., Ende, T., Parusel, S.: Roboterfabrik: a pilot to link and unify german robotics education to match industrial and societal demands. In: Companion of the 2018 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pp. 375–375. ACM (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Intel: Intel RealSense SR300 (2016). https://software.intel.com/en-us/realsense/sr300. Accessed 29 Aug 2017

  14. Jambor, T.N.: Techcolleges: learn to teach using robots. In: International Conference on Robotics and Education RiE 2017, pp. 3–14. Springer (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Jäger, A., Moll, C., Som, O., Zanker, C.: Analysis of the impact of robotic systems on employment in the european union. Technical report, Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research ISI, Karlsruhe (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kopf, H., Müller, S., Rüede, D., Lurtz, K., Russo, P.: Einführung: made in Germany? Fachkräftemangel gefährdet den Wirtschaftsstandort Deutschland. In: Soziale Innovationen in Deutschland, pp. 61–63. Springer (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kriegseisen-Peruzzi, M.: Ergotherapeutisch-handlungswissenschaftliche Zugänge als Ressource in der Entwicklung neuer Technologien: Begleitstudie zum ersten Robothon an der FH Salzburg. Fachtagung Ergotherapie Austria (2016). https://www.fhg-tirol.ac.at/data.cfm?vpath=pdf-downloads/robothon-handout_-ftea_2016_akpdf. Accessed 29 Aug 2017

  18. Merz, R.: Robothon Fachhochschule Salzburg (2015). http://its.fh-salzburg.ac.at/events/robothon/ueber-robothon/. Accessed 21 Aug 2017

  19. Meyer, S.: Einsatz von Robotik in der Pflege - was zeichnet sich ab? In: Der Demographiekongress (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Microsoft: Kinect V2 (2014). http://www.xbox.com/en-US/xbox-one/accessories/kinect. Visited on 29th of August 2017

  21. Nomura, T., Suzuki, T., Kanda, T., Han, J., Shin, N., Burke, J., Kato, K.: What people assume about humanoid and animal-type robots: cross-cultural analysis between Japan, Korea, and the United States. Int. J. Humanoid Robot. 5(01), 25–46 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Nomura, T., Suzuki, T., Kanda, T., Yamada, S., Kato, K.: Attitudes toward robots and factors influencing them. In: New Frontiers in Human-Robot Interaction, pp. 73–88 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Nomura, T., Tasaki, T., Kanda, T., Shiomi, M., Ishiguro, H., Hagita, N.: Questionnaire-based research on opinions of visitors for communication robots at an exhibition in Japan. Lect. Notes in Comput. Sci. 3585, 685 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Open Source: TensorFlow: Large-scale machine learning on heterogeneous systems (2017). https://www.tensorflow.org/. Accessed 30 Aug 2017

  25. Pedregosa, F., Varoquaux, G., Gramfort, A., Michel, V., Thirion, B., Grisel, O., Blondel, M., Prettenhofer, P., Weiss, R., Dubourg, V.: Scikit-learn: machine learning in python. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 12, 2825–2830 (2011)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Ray, C., Mondada, F., Siegwart, R.: What do people expect from robots? In: IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, IROS 2008, pp. 3816–3821. IEEE (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Riek, L.D., Adams, A., Robinson, P.: Exposure to cinematic depictions of robots and attitudes towards them. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, Workshop on Expectations and Intuitive Human-Robot Interaction (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Sahi, M.K., Kaul, A.: Consumer robotics - household robots, vacuum robots, lawn mowing robots, pool cleaning robots, personal assistant robots, and toy and educational robots: Global market analysis and forecasts (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Suzuki, K., Zhu, X.: Regions bustle with workshops, courses, robothon, and a society inauguration [chapter news]. IEEE Robot. Autom. Mag. 23(4), 193–198 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

We would like to sincerely thank the Region Hannover for their generous funding of the project roboterfabrik. We would also like to give special thanks to Reinhard Biederbeck from Region Hannover, Torsten Temmeyer from IHK Hannover, the teachers from the regional vocational schools BBS ME and BBS Neustadt for their support in creating the certification of the workshops. Special thanks go to Ina May from Roberta RegioZentrum Hannover and the participating pupils and students for active engagement and continuous valuable feedback.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marvin Becker .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Haddadin, S. et al. (2019). roboterfabrik: A Pilot to Link and Unify German Robotics Education to Match Industrial and Societal Demands. In: Lepuschitz, W., Merdan, M., Koppensteiner, G., Balogh, R., Obdržálek, D. (eds) Robotics in Education. RiE 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 829. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97085-1_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics