Abstract
The advent of the internet was arguably the most important development in modern society. It has altered nearly every aspect of modern social behavior and therefore represents one of the (if not ‘THE’) biggest changes humankind has ever experienced. The internet has shifted paradigms in thinking, particularly in science and natural resource management, as we are now able to store and deliver data faster than ever. However, the internet also played a major role in moving us further into the Anthropocene due to its role in globalization, related climate change, wilderness degradation and ongoing over-population. Despite the implications for the natural world, the dramatic increase in internet accessibility has yet to be studied with regards to ethical considerations in ecology. In this chapter, we take an approach reflective of human optimism and focus on one of the ‘pros’ of the internet by examining how the cloud can be used with machine learning algorithms to explore aspects and sustainability of natural resource management. We present an overview of several ecological applications which take advantage of cloud computing and machine learning that have already left a global impact. Secondly, we show how machine learning in the cloud is likely to be employed in the near future for natural resource management. Lastly, we conclude with a holistic perspective on governance of global sustainability that takes the carbon and energy footprint of the cloud into account. While technology is increasingly driving global decision making, we argue that ecological and associated ethical considerations and their global constraints must be fully considered to ensure a truly sustainable society.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Alexander JC (2013) The dark side of modernity. Polity Press, Cambridge, p 187
Anderson DR, Cooch EG, Gutierrez RJ, Krebs CJ, Lindberg MS, Pollock KM, Ribic CA, Shenk TM (2003) Rigorous science: suggestions on how to raise the bar. Wildl Soc Bull 31:296–305
Armbrust M, Fox A, Griffith R, Joseph AD, Katz RH, Konwinski A, Lee G, Patterson DA, Rabkin A, Stoica I, Zaharia M (2009) Above the clouds: a Berkeley view of cloud computing. http://home.cse.ust.hk/~weiwa/teaching/Fall15-COMP6611B/reading_list/AboveTheClouds.pdf
Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach. Springer Science and Business media, New York
Carlson D (2011) A lesson in sharing. Nature 469:293
Cockburn A (2013) A colossal wreck. Verso Publishers, London
Costello MJ, Appeltans W, Bailly N, Berendsohn WG, de Yong Y, Edwards M, Froese R, Huettmann F, Los W, Mees J (2014) Strategies for the sustainability of online open-access biodiversity databases. Biol Conserv 173:155–165
Cushman S, Huettmann F (2010) Spatial complexity, informatics and wildlife conservation. Springer, Tokyo, p 448
Che-Castaldo C, Jenouvrier S, Youngflesh C, Shoemaker KT, Humphries G, McDowall P, Landrum L, Holland MM, Li Y, Ji R, Lynch HJ (2017) Pan-Antarctic analysis aggregating spatial estimates of Adélie penguin abundance reveals robust dynamics despite stochastic noise. Nat Commun 8(1):832
Diamond J (2005) Collapse: how societies choose to fail or succeed. Viking Press, New York
Drew CA, Wiersma Y, Huettmann F (2010) Predictive species and habitat modeling in landscape ecology. Springer, New York, pp 45–70
Eichstaedt P (2016) Consuming the Congo: war and conflict minerals in the World’s deadliest place. Chicago Review Press, Chicago
Fink D, Damoulas T, Dave J (2013) Adaptive Spatio-temporal exploratory models: hemisphere-wide species distributions from massively crowdsourced eBird data. Proceedings of the twenty-seventh AAAI conference on artificial intelligence. http://www.aaai.org/ocs/index.php/AAAI/AAAI13/paper/viewFile/6417/6852
Forman RTT (1995) Land mosaics: the ecology of landscapes and regions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Gergel S, Turner MG (2001) Learning landscape ecology. Springer, New York
Gill FB (2007) Ornithology, 3rd edn. W. H. Freeman & Co., New York
Hochachka W, Caruana R, Fink D, Munson A, Riedewald M, Sorokina D, Kelling S (2007) Data mining for discovery of pattern and process in ecological systems. J Wildl Manag 71:2427–2437
Huettmann F (2007a) The digital teaching legacy of the international polar year (IPY): details of a present to the global village for achieving sustainability. In: Tjoa M, Wagner RR (eds) Proceedings 18th international workshop on Database and Expert Systems Applications (DEXA) 3–7 September 2007, Regensburg, Germany. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos, pp 673–677
Huettmann F (2007b) Modern adaptive management: adding digital opportunities towards a sustainable world with new values. Forum on public policy: climate change and sustainable development. 3: 337–342
Huettmann F (2015a) On the relevance and moral impediment of digital data management, data sharing, and public open access and open source code in (tropical) research: the Rio convention revisited towards mega science and best professional research practices. In: Huettmann F (ed) Central American biodiversity: conservation, ecology, and a sustainable future. Springer, New York, pp 391–418
Huettmann F (2015b) Field schools and research stations in a global context: La Suerte (Costa Rica) and Ometepe (Nicaragua) in a wider perspective. In: Huettmann F (ed) Central American biodiversity: conservation, ecology, and a sustainable future. Springer, New York, pp 174–198
Huettmann F (2015c) Teaching (tropical) biodiversity with international field schools: a flexible success model in a time of “wireless” globalization. In: Huettmann F (ed) Central American biodiversity: conservation, ecology, and a sustainable future. Springer, New York, pp 215–245
Huettmann F, Ickert-Bond S (2017) On open access, data mining and plant conservation in the circumpolar north with an online data example of the herbarium, University of Alaska Museum of the north Arctic Science http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/toc/as/0/ja
Huettmann F, Artukhin Y, Gilg O, Humphries G (2011) Predictions of 27 Arctic pelagic seabird distributions using public environmental variables, assessed with colony data: a first digital IPY and GBIF open access synthesis platform. Mar Biodivers 41:141–179
Humphries GRW, Huettmann F (2014) Putting models to a good use: a rapid assessment of Arctic seabird biodiversity indicates potential conflicts with shipping lanes and human activity. Divers Distrib 20(4):478–490
Humphries GRW, Naveen R, Schwaller M, Che-Castaldo C, McDowall P, Schrimpf M, Lynch HJ (2017) Mapping application for penguin populations and projected dynamics (MAPPPD): data and tools for dynamic management and decision support. Polar Rec 53(2):160–166
Kandel K, Huettmann F, Suwal MK, Regmi GR, Nijman V, Nekaris KAI, Lama ST, Thapa A, Sharma HP, Subedi TR (2015) Rapid multi-nation distribution assessment of a charismatic conservation species using open access ensemble model GIS predictions: red panda (Ailurus fulgens) in the Hindu-Kush Himalaya region. Biol Conserv 181:150–161
Kelling S, Gerbracht J, Fink D, Lagoze C, Wong W-K, Yu J, Damoulas T, Gomes C (2012) eBird: a human/computer learning network for biodiversity conservation and research. Proceedings of the twenty-fourth innovative applications of artificial intelligence conference
Manly FJ, McDonald LL, Thomas DL, McDonald TL, Erickson WP (2002) Resource selection by animals: statistical design and analysis for field studies. Second edition. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Netherlands
Mills MP (2013) The cloud begins with coal: big data, big networks, big infrastructure, and big power; an overview of the electricity used by the global digital ecosystem. Report: digitalpower group. National Mining Association. American Coalition for Clean Coal Electricity. Washington D.C. U.S. https://www.tech-pundit.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/Cloud_Begins_With_Coal.pdf?c761ac&c761ac
Moilanen A, Wilson KA, Possingham H (2009) Spatial conservation prioritization: quantitative methods and computational tools, 1st edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Mordecai R, Laurent E, Moore-Barnhill L, Huettmann F, Miller D, Sachs E, Tirpak J (2010) A field guide to web technology. Southeast Partners in Flight (SEPIF).http://sepif.org/content/view/62/1/
Mueller JP, Massaron L (2016) Machine learning for dummies. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, p 435
Muñoz MES, Giovanni R, Siqueira MF, Sutton T, Brewer P, Pereira RS, Canhos DAL, Canhos VP (2011) Open modeller: a generic approach to species’ potential distribution modelling. GeoInformatica 15:111–135
Næss A (1989) Ecology, community and lifestyle: outline of an ecosophy (trans: Rothenberg D). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
O’Neil C (2016) Weapons of math destruction. How big data increases inequality and threatens democracy. Crown Publisher, New York
Primack R (2016) Essentials of conservation biology, 6th edn. Sinauer Press, Bosto
Rosales V (2008a) Globalization and the new international trade environment. CEPAL Rev
Rosales J (2008b) Economic growth, climate change, biodiversity loss: distributive justice for the global north and south. Conserv Biol 22(6):1409–1417
Silva NJ (2012) The wildlife techniques manual: research & management, vol 2, 7th edn. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore
Sullivan BL, Wood CL, Iliff MJ, Bonney RE, Fink D, Kelling S (2009) eBird: a citizen-based bird observation network in the biological sciences. Biol Conserv 142:2282–2292
SYS-CON Media (2008) Twenty experts define cloud computing, http://cloudcomputing.sys-con.com/read/612375_p.htm
Walsh B (2013) The surprisingly large energy footprint of the digital economy [UPDATE].TIME. Aug 14. http://science.time.com/2013/08/14/power-drain-the-digital-cloud-is-using-more-energy-than-you-think/
Yen P, Ziegler S, Huettmann F, Onyeahialam AI (2005) Change detection of forest and habitat resources from 1973 to 2001 in Bach Ma National Park, Vietnam, using remote sensing imagery. Int For Rev 7(1):1–8
Youseff L, Butrico M, Da Silva D (2008) Toward-a-Unified-Ontology-of-Cloud-Computing. Conference paper December 2008. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/GCE.2008.4738443Source: IEEE Xplore Conference: Grid Computing Environments Workshop, 2008. GCE ’08. http://dosen.narotama.ac.id/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/Toward-a-Unified-Ontology-of-Cloud-Computing.pdf
Zar JH (2010) Biostatistical analysis, 5th edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River
Zuckerberg B, Huettmann F, Friar J (2011) Proper data management as a scientific foundation for reliable species distribution modeling, Chapter 3. In: Drew CA, Wiersma Y, Huettmann F (eds) Predictive species and habitat modeling in landscape ecology. Springer, New York, pp 45–70
Acknowledgements
We acknowledge Springer Publisher for the opportunity to write this chapter. FH wishes to thank his colleagues, the EWHALE lab, S. Linke, I. Presse and many co-workers that helped shaping this manuscript. T. Marr,B. Barnes and the Canadian Wildlife Service helped us to show how not to set up, run and organize Bioinformatic and Survey Data Centers. This is EWHALE lab publication #181.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Humphries, G.R.W., Huettmann, F. (2018). Machine Learning and ‘The Cloud’ for Natural Resource Applications: Autonomous Online Robots Driving Sustainable Conservation Management Worldwide?. In: Humphries, G., Magness, D., Huettmann, F. (eds) Machine Learning for Ecology and Sustainable Natural Resource Management. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96978-7_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96978-7_18
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-96976-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-96978-7
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)