Skip to main content

Recruiting and Incorporating Mid-Level Providers

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Orthopedic Practice Management
  • 587 Accesses

Abstract

Although relatively new to the field of healthcare, mid-level providers have become effective and reliable resources to expand clinical productivity – especially in the field of orthopedic surgery. Despite common misconceptions, the hiring of such individuals into a healthcare organization does not create a financial burden. In fact, there are many ways to incorporate these individuals into the healthcare team, with each supporting the notion that having a mid-level provider significantly increases revenue, clinic throughput, and patient access to care. Interviewing and hiring a mid-level provider to become a part of the clinical team is a process that can be customized and adapted based on the physician’s needs, thereby mitigating the burden of the hiring process. Furthermore, just as the interview and hiring processes allow for flexibility, so too does the manner in which the physician chooses how to use mid-level providers. Possible options include having mid-level providers see additional patients in clinic while the supervising physician performs surgical cases, having mid-level providers assist with administrative work and patient contact, and having mid-level providers serve as a first assist during surgical procedures. The manner in which the physician assistant or nurse practitioner is used greatly depends on the goals and desires of the physician, again allowing for a system that can best meet the needs of individual clinics or organizations. In summary, the incorporation into and use of mid-level providers in the orthopedic clinic is a practice whose benefits far outweigh the burdens needed to successfully recruit these providers. Here, we report effective strategies regarding how to incorporate mid-level providers into the orthopedic clinic, as well as the myriad of benefits provided by having these individuals as part of the healthcare team.

Synergy: [Sin-er-jee]: noun: The interaction of the elements that, when combined, produce a total effect that is greater than the sum of the individual elements, contributions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Marjoua Y, Bozic KJ. Brief history of quality movement in US healthcare. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2012;5(4):265–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. PAs Practice Medicine. American Academy of PAs 2017. 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Jennings N, Lee G, Chao K, Keating S. A survey of patient satisfaction in a metropolitan emergency department: comparing nurse practitioners and emergency physicians. Int J Nurs Pract. 2009;15(3):213–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Katz JA. The evolving role of PAs: American Academy of PAs; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  5. A look at each APRN role. HealthCom, Media. 2017

    Google Scholar 

  6. Glotzbecker BE, Yolin-Raley DS, DeAngelo DJ, Stone RM, Soiffer RJ, Alyea EP. Impact of physician assistants on the outcomes of patients with acute myelogenous leukemia receiving chemotherapy in an Academic Medical Center. J Oncol Pract. 2013;9(5):e228–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. The Connecticut Academy of Physician Assistants Government Affairs Committee. ConnAPA scope of practice request. Connecticut academy of physician assistants. 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Furlow B. Nurse practitioners outscore physicians in patient satisfaction survey: Haymarket Media, Inc; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Brady MI. A survey assessing patient satisfaction with physician assistant care at the maple street clinic. School of Physician Assistant Studies. 2004;127:1–29.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Zerehi MR, Rathfon E. Internists and physician assistants: team-based primary care: American College of Physicians; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Medical Group Management Association. Physician compensation and production survey: 2009 report based on 2008 data. Englewood: Co: Medical Group Management Association; 2009. p. 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  12. 2016 Practice and Salary Survey Report. Physician assistants Orthopaedic surgery. 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Program Outcomes. Commission on accreditation of athletic training education. 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  14. NCCPA. Exam development and scoring. 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Larson EH, Coerver DA, Wick KH, Ballweg RA. Physician assistants in orthopedic practice. A national study. J Allied Health. 2011;40(4):174–80.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. State of California. Frequently asked questions about supervising physician assistants. 2016 state of California. 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Scope of practice FAQs for consumers. National Council of state boards of nursing. 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Smith T. Athletic trainers pump up Care in Orthopedics Clinic. UCHealth Central Insider. 2015;8(18)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Larkin GL, Hooker RS. Patient willingness to be seen by physician assistants, nurse practitioners, and residents in the emergency department: does the presumption of assent have an empirical basis? Am J Bioeth. 2010;10(8):1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hiring a PA: the benefits for physicians and practices. American Academy of physician assistants. 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  21. DeCapua M. How much revenue does a primary care nurse practitioner generate? Barton Associates; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Liu N, Finkelstein SR, Poghosyan L. A new model for nurse practitioner utilization in primary care: increased efficiency and implications. Health Care Manag Rev. 2014;39(1):10–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Pecha FQ, Xerogeanes JW, Karas SG, Himes ME, Mines BA. Comparison of the effect of medical assistants versus certified athletic trainers on patient volumes and revenue generation in a sports medicine practice. Sports Health. 2013;5(4):337–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Dunn L. 6 Ancillary services to increase your orthopedic practice revenue: ASC Communications; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  25. U.S. News & World Report Announces the 2017 Best Jobs. U.S. News & World Report LP. 2017.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author’s Disclaimer

For purposes of this chapter, the term “mid-level practitioner” (MLP) will be utilized to loosely bundle the “nonphysician” group of advanced practice providers and clinicians entailing nurse practitioners (NPs), physician assistants (PAs), certified athletic trainers (ATCs), and other physician extenders such as nurse midwives, nurse anesthetists, and physical therapists.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Borowsky, P., Blanchett, J., Pilz, K., Makhni, E.C. (2019). Recruiting and Incorporating Mid-Level Providers. In: Makhni, E., Makhni, M., Swart, E., Bush-Joseph, C. (eds) Orthopedic Practice Management. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96938-1_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96938-1_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-96937-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-96938-1

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics