Skip to main content

Outer Space as a Socioeconomic Field

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Geopolitics of the Outer Space

Part of the book series: Contributions to Political Science ((CPS))

  • 655 Accesses

Abstract

The third part of the analysis of the outer space domain is concerned with the economic and social importance of space activities. This chapter begins with the discussion of the social improvements and impacts space activities hold for the terrestrial population. The following section deals with the introduction of the economic activities connected to outer space utilization. Consequently, the topic of private entities emerging in the development of the domain is raised. The two last sections then present the issue of resource and energy extraction and the future of the space economy in general. The third section analyzing the outer space as a geopolitical domain thus presents the final piece of the puzzle for the holistic understanding of the region.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See, for example, Kansakar and Hossain (2016).

  2. 2.

    See Norris (2010).

  3. 3.

    https://spinoff.nasa.gov/database/. Accessed 20 April 2016.

  4. 4.

    https://spinoff.nasa.gov/Spinoff2015/pdf/Spinoff2015.pdf. Accessed 20 April 2016.

  5. 5.

    https://spinoff.nasa.gov/pdf/Apollo_Flyer.pdf. Accessed 20 April 2016.

  6. 6.

    Originally called Global Monitoring for Environmental Security—the name changed to its later form in 1999 (Wang 2013, p. 145).

  7. 7.

    See van Creveld (2000).

  8. 8.

    See Handberg (2006) and Norris (2010).

  9. 9.

    For a detailed description of the story, see Dubbs and Paat-Dahlstrom (2013, pp. 87–113).

  10. 10.

    See also Johnson-Freese and Handberg (1997).

  11. 11.

    See Fuller Jr et al. (2009).

  12. 12.

    http://lunar.xprize.org/. Accessed 20 December 2015.

  13. 13.

    See http://www.space.com/32546-interstellar-spaceflight-stephen-hawking-project-starshot.html. Accessed 5 June 2017.

  14. 14.

    See the specifications of the launcher at http://www.spacex.com/falcon-heavy. Accessed 22 March 2018.

  15. 15.

    http://ansari.xprize.org/teams. Accessed 13 May 2016.

  16. 16.

    http://www.spacesafetymagazine.com/space-disasters/virgin-galactic/virgin-galactic-brief-history/. Accessed 16 May 2016.

  17. 17.

    For the summary of steps needed to be taken before the extraction process, see, for example, Carpenter et al. (2016).

  18. 18.

    See, for example, McInnes (2016).

  19. 19.

    For more information on He-3 utilization, see among others D’Souza et al. (2006) and Schmitt (2006).

  20. 20.

    Project Luna Ring by Japanese company Shimizu presented the latter option in a project proposal phase pointing to its potential viability. For more details see: https://www.shimz.co.jp/english/theme/dream/lunaring.html. Accessed 13 May 2016.

  21. 21.

    See http://planetquest.jpl.nasa.gov/, https://www.planethunters.org/, or http://sci.esa.int/gaia/40577-extra-solar-planets/. Accessed 13 May 2016.

References

  • Al-Rodhan, N. R. F. (2012). Meta-geopolitics of outer space: An analysis of space power, security, and governance. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Baiocchi, D., & Welser IV, W. (2015). The democratization of space: New actors need new rules. Foreign Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bekey, I. (2009). Chapter 9: The long-term outlook for commercial space. In C. D. Lutes & P. L. Hays (Eds.), Toward the theory of spacepower: Selected essays (pp. 175–196). Washington, DC: Institute for National Strategic Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brearley, A. (2006). Mining the moon: Owning the night sky? Astropolitics, 4(1), 43–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, J., Fisackerly, R., & Houdou, B. (2016). Establishing lunar resource viability. Space Policy, 37(2), 52–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Correll, R. R. (2009). Chapter 26: Emerging actors. In C. D. Lutes & P. L. Hays (Eds.), Toward the theory of spacepower: Selected essays (pp. 490–516). Washington, DC: Institute for National Strategic Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, I. A. (2015). Lunar resources: A review. Retrieved December 12, 2015, from http://www.homepages.ucl.ac.uk/~ucfbiac/Lunar_resources_review_preprint_accepted_manuscript.pdf

  • Crotts, A. (2014). The new moon: Water, exploration and future habitation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • D’Souza, M. R., Otalvaro, D. M., & Singh, D. A. (2006). Harvesting helium-3 from the Moon. Worcester: Worcester Polytechnic Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubbs, C., & Paat-Dahlstrom, E. (2013). Realizing tommorow. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dudley-Flores, M., & Gangale, T. (2012). Forecasting the political economy of the inner solar system. Astropolitics, 10(3), 183–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ESA. (2012, November 14). Global monitoring for environment and security (GMES). Retrieved March 2, 2016, from http://www.esa.int/About_Us/Ministerial_Council_2012/Global_Monitoring_for_Environment_and_Security_GMES

  • Fuller Jr., J., et al. (2009). Chapter 6: The commercial space industry: A critical spacepower consideration. In C. D. Lutes & P. L. Hays (Eds.), Towards the theory of spacepower. Washington, DC: Institute for National Strategic Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grygiel, J. (2006). Great powers and geopolitical change. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Handberg, R. (2006). International space commerce: Building from scratch. Gainesville: University Press of Florida.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henri, Y., & Nozdrin, V. (2012). Economic methods of improving efficient use of the orbit/spectrum resource by satellite systems. Space Policy, 28(3), 185–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hertzfeld, H. R. (2009). Chapter 5: Commercial space and spacepower. In C. D. Lutes & P. L. Hays (Eds.), Toward the theory of spacepower: Selected essays (pp. 80–100). Washington, DC: Institute for National Strategic Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hickman, J. (2008). Problems of interplanetary and interstellar trade. Astropolitics, 6(1), 95–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ISECG. (2013, September). Benefits stemming from space exploration. Retrieved March 21, 2016, from https://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/files/Benefits-Stemming-from-Space-Exploration-2013-TAGGED.pdf

  • Johnson-Freese, J. (2016). Space warfare in the 21st century: Arming the heavens. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson-Freese, J., & Handberg, R. (1997). Space, the dormant frontier: Changing the paradigm for the 21st century. Westport, CT: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kansakar, P., & Hossain, F. (2016). A review of applications of satellite earth observation data for global societal benefit and stewardship of planet earth. Space Policy, 36, 46–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, J. S. (1997). Mining the sky: Untold riches from the asteroids, comets, and planets. New York: Helix Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • McInnes, C. R. (2016). Near earth asteroid resource utilisation for large in-orbit reflectors. Space Policy, 37(2), 62–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michaud, M. A. G. (2007). Contact with alien civilizations: Our hopes and fears about encountering extraterrestrials. New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Moltz, J. C. (2014). Crowded orbits: Conflict and cooperation in space. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nansen, R. (2009). Energy crisis: Solution from space. Ontario: Apogee Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris, P. (2010). Watching earth from space: How surveillance helps us – And harms us. Chichester: Praxis.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Oberg, J. E. (2009). Chapter 22: International perspectives: Russia. In C. D. Lutes & P. L. Hays (Eds.), Toward the theory of spacepower: Selected essays (pp. 418–437). Washington, DC: Institute for National Strategic Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paikowski, D., Levi, R., & Isaac, B. I. (2013). Israel’s space strategy. In E. Sadeh (Ed.), Space strategy in the 21st century: Theory and policy (pp. 322–334). Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paikowsky, D. (2017). What is new space? The changing ecosystem of global space activity. New Space, 5(2), 84–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pasco, X. (2009). Chapter 25: The European ‘spacepower’? A multifaced concept. In C. D. Lutes & P. L. Hays (Eds.), Toward the theory of spacepower: Selected essays (pp. 473–489). Washington, DC: Institute for National Strategic Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quintana, E. (2017). The new space age: Questions for defence and security. The RUSI Journal, 162(3), 88–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rapp, D. (2007). Solar power beamed from space. Astropolitics, 5(1), 63–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, J., & Romancov, M. (2014, January). The European Union and space: Opportunities and risks. Retrieved June 4, 2016, from http://www.sipri.org/research/disarmament/euconsortium/publications/nonproliferation-paper-37.pdf

  • Schmitt, H. (2006). Return to the moon: Exploration, enterprise, and energy in the human settlement of space. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sommariva, A. (2014). Motivations behind interstellar exploration and colonization. Astropolitics, 12(1), 82–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sommariva, A. (2015). Rationale, strategies, and economics for exploration and mining of asteroids. Astropolitics, 13(1), 25–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sowers, G. F. (2016). A cislunar transportation system fueled by lunar resources. Space Policy, 37(2), 101–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • SpaceX. (2016). About. Retrieved March 3, 2016, from http://www.spacex.com/about

  • Spudis, P. D. (2009). Chapter 12: The Moon: Point of entry to cislunar space. In C. D. Lutes & P. L. Hays (Eds.), Toward the theory of spacepower: Selected essays (pp. 238–248). Washington, DC: Institute for National Strategic Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Straub, J. (2015). Does the use of space solar power for in-space activities really make sense: An updated economic assessment. Space Policy, 31, 21–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Creveld, M. (2000). The new middle ages. Foreign Policy, 119, 38–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Virgin Galactic. (2016). Virgin galactic. Retrieved March 21, 2016, from http://www.virgingalactic.com/

  • Wang, S.-C. (2013). Transatlantic space politics: Competition and cooperation above the clouds. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wingo, D. (2009). Chapter 8: Economic development of the solar system: The heart of a 21st century spacepower theory. In C. D. Lutes & P. L. Hays (Eds.), Toward the theory of spacepower: Selected essays (pp. 150–174). Washington, DC: Institute for National Strategic Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zubrin, R. (1996). The case for Mars: The plan to settle the red planet and why we must. New York: Touchstone.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Doboš, B. (2019). Outer Space as a Socioeconomic Field. In: Geopolitics of the Outer Space. Contributions to Political Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96857-5_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics