Skip to main content

Introduction

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Geopolitics of the Outer Space

Part of the book series: Contributions to Political Science ((CPS))

  • 656 Accesses

Abstract

A look at the night sky gave generations of human beings living on Earth feelings of mysteriousness, of vast emptiness. The unknown nature of the great darkness with seemingly supernatural lights on it inspired wild fantasies as well as religious zeal that were not always friendly toward the scientific understanding of the realm. Despite many obstacles, human comprehension of outer space enhanced throughout the centuries, and people grew more and more curious regarding the possibilities of direct interaction with the night sky. Twentieth-century technological and scientific developments finally enabled humans and man-made objects to enter this “final frontier” and to enhance its understanding of the great unknown as well as enable the utilization of the potential benefits coming from the outer space. In 1942 the first artificial object—the German V-2 rocket—crossed the 100 km Kármán line generally considered to be an edge of the outer space (Bille and Lishock 2004, p. 59). In 1957 the Soviet Sputnik-1 became the first artificial satellite on Earth’s orbit. The same year, Laika became the first animal to orbit the “Blue Planet.” In 1961 Yuri Gagarin was the first human to enter outer space and orbit the Earth. In 1969 the Apollo 11 crew was the first to land on the surface of the Moon. Despite the cooling down of the space race following the lunar landing, the outer space plays a crucial role for life on Earth, and it might be said that the end of the bipolar space race was the beginning of a more comprehensive and sustainable utilization of the domain. The space assets are essential for activities such as global positioning, communications, reconnaissance, or weather forecasting connected to many commercial, civilian, and military activities.

“In the beginning the Universe was created. This has made a lot of people very angry and been widely regarded as a bad move.”

(Adams 1995, p. 1)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The justification of the neoclassical approach to the study of the outer space is provided, for example, by Wang (2009, 2013, p. 39).

  2. 2.

    This approach is in the outer space domain presented mainly by E. Dolman—e.g., Dolman (1999, 2005).

  3. 3.

    For the discussion over the role of discourse and symbolic value of the outer space, see among other works Bormann and Sheehan (2009).

References

  • Adams, D. (1995). The restaurant at the end of the universe. New York: Del Rey Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Rodhan, N. R. F. (2012). Meta-geopolitics of outer space: An analysis of space power, security and governance. Basingstoke: Palgrave.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bille, M., & Lishock, E. (2004). The first space race: Launching the world’s first satellites. College Station: Texas A&M University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bormann, N., & Sheehan, M. (2009). Securing outer space. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, S. B. (2014). Geopolitics: The geography of international relations. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dolman, E. C. (1999). Geostrategy in the space age: An astropolitical analysis. Journal of Strategic Studies, 22(2–3), 83–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dolman, E. C. (2005). Astropolitik: Classical geopolitics in the space age. London: Frank Cass Publishers.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dussuoy, G. (2010). Systemic geopolitics: A global interpretation method of the world. Geopolitics, 15(1), 133–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glassner, M. I. (1996). Political geography. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grygiel, J. (2006). Great powers and geopolitical change. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Havercroft, J., & Duvall, R. (2009). Critical astropolitics: The geopolitics of space control and the transformation of state sovereignty. In N. Bormann & M. Sheehan (Eds.), Securing outer space (pp. 42–58). Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haverluk, T. W., Beauchemin, K. M., & Mueller, B. A. (2014). The three critical flaws of critical geopolitics: Towards a neo-classical geopolitics. Geopolitics, 19(1), 19–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hnízdo, B. (1995). Mezinárodní perspektivy politických regionů. Praha: Institut pro středoevropskou kulturu a politiku.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lévy, J. (2000). A user’s guide to world-spaces. Geopolitics, 5(2), 67–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lonsdale, D. J. (1999). Information power: Strategy, geopolitics, and the fifth dimension. Journal of Strategic Studies, 22(2–3), 137–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald, F. (2007). Anti-Astropolitik – Outer space and the orbit of geography. Progress in Human Geography, 31(5), 592–615.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ó Tuathail, G. (1996). Critical geopolitics: The politics of writing global space. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, J., & Romancov, M. (2014). The European Union and space: Opportunities and risks. SIPRI, Non-Proliferation Paper no. 37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, S.-C. (2009). The making of new “space”: Cases of transatlantic astropolitics. Geopolitics, 14(3), 433–461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, S.-C. (2013). Transatlantic space politics: Competition and cooperation above the clouds. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Doboš, B. (2019). Introduction. In: Geopolitics of the Outer Space. Contributions to Political Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96857-5_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics