Advertisement

Continuity and Drift: Child Income Support

  • Anthony McCashinEmail author
Chapter
  • 99 Downloads

Abstract

‘Drift’ is one form of welfare state change and retrenchment; policies remain unchanged, but the wider social context changes. This chapter shows the suite of benefits around children remained substantially unchanged over a long period; ideas had little influence, and crisis induced policy changes did not alter the overall policy design.

Keywords

Child Benefit Retrenchment ‘Drift’ Troika 

References

  1. Advisory Group on Tax and Social Welfare [Mangan]. (2012). First Report; Child and Family Income Support. Dublin: Department of Social Protection.Google Scholar
  2. Callan, T., O’Neill, C. J., & O’Donoghue, C. J. (1995). Supplementing Family Incomes. Dublin: Economic and Social Research Institute.Google Scholar
  3. Commission on Taxation. (2009). Report. Dublin: Government Publications.Google Scholar
  4. DSP. (2010). A Policy and Value for Money Review of Child Income Support and Associated Spending Programmes. Dublin: Department of Social Protection.Google Scholar
  5. Expert Working Group on the Integration of the Tax and Social Welfare Systems. (1996). Report. Dublin: Government Publications.Google Scholar
  6. Fine Gael. (2011). Election Manifesto 2011.Google Scholar
  7. Government of Ireland. (1984). Building on Reality. Dublin: Government Publications.Google Scholar
  8. Government of Ireland. (2011). Government for National Recovery, 2011–2016: 52.Google Scholar
  9. Laffan, B. (2017). International Actors and Agencies. In W. Roche, P. J. O’Connell, & A. Prothero (Eds.), Austerity and Recovery in Ireland. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Mahon, E. (2012, October 3). Proposal to Cut Child Benefit Short-Sighted. Irish Times.Google Scholar
  11. McCashin, A. (2004). Social Security in Ireland. Dublin: Gill and Macmillan.Google Scholar
  12. NESC. (1991). Women’s Participation in the Irish Labour Market. Dublin: National Economic and Social Council.Google Scholar
  13. O’Regan, R. (2012, December 3). Burton Seems to Rule Out Tax or Means-Test. Irish Times.Google Scholar
  14. Schmidt, V. A. (2008). Discursive Institutionalism: The Explanatory Power of Ideas and Discourse. Annual Review of Political Science, 11(1), 303–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Social Work and Social PolicyTrinity CollegeDublin 2Ireland

Personalised recommendations