Skip to main content

The Spectator as a History of Encounters

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Spectatorship and Film Theory
  • 524 Accesses

Abstract

The final chapter begins by retracing the main arguments of the book, highlighting the creative aspects of spectatorship as an interpersonal relation and moving from a critique of the allegory of the cave as a model of film spectatorship to Leo Bersani and Ulysses Dutoit’s ideas of homoness and aesthetic illumination. In the second part of the chapter, Paul Auster’s novel Man in the Dark is presented as an example of the everyday, situated, free associative and embodied practice of spectatorship. If spectatorship is a matter of a scene of dialogue and of the scene of looking at the same time, then the experience of the spectator is, at its core, always a matter of more than one viewer and a viewer is, conversely, always already the history of its different encounters with film.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Jean-Louis Baudry, “The Apparatus ,” Camera Obscura 1, no. 11 (1976): 110.

  2. 2.

    See Jacques Rancière , Le Philosophe et ses Pauvres (Paris: Flammarion, 2007), xi. Preface to the French edition.

  3. 3.

    See Leo Bersani and Ulysse Dutoit, “Beauty’s Light,” October 82 (1997): 17. See also Leo Bersani and Ulysse Dutoit, Caravaggio’s Secrets (Cambridge and London: MIT Press, 1998); Leo Bersani and Ulysse Dutoit, Caravaggio (London: British Film Institute, 1999).

  4. 4.

    See Bersani and Dutoit, “Beauty’s Light,” 27.

  5. 5.

    Bersani and Dutoit, Caravaggio, 57.

  6. 6.

    Bersani and Dutoit, Beauty’s Light, 27.

  7. 7.

    Leo Bersani , Is the Rectum a Grave? (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2010), 70.

  8. 8.

    Ibid., 43–44.

  9. 9.

    Leo Bersani and Ulysse Dutoit, Forms of Being: Cinema, Aesthetics, Subjectivity (London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2004), 120.

  10. 10.

    See Leo Bersani , “Psychoanalysis and the Aesthetic Subject,” Critical Inquiry 32, no. 2 (2006): 145–146.

  11. 11.

    James Baldwin, The Devil Finds Work (London: Michael Joseph, 1976), 67.

  12. 12.

    Bersani, “Psychoanalysis and the Aesthetic Subject,” 152–153.

  13. 13.

    Ibid., 150.

  14. 14.

    “Immanent in every subject is its similitude with other subjects (and other objects).” Bersani and Dutoit, Forms of Being, 8. “Universally immanent” connections that are in turn made to correspond to a “limitless extensibility [of the subject] in both space and time.” Ibid., 9.

  15. 15.

    Kaja Silverman, Flesh of My Flesh (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2009), 4. See also Kaja Silverman, World Spectators (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2000), 2.

  16. 16.

    See Judith Butler , Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity (New York and London: Routledge, 1999), 152.

  17. 17.

    Bersani and Dutoit, “Beauty’s Light,” 28.

  18. 18.

    Bersani, Is the Rectum a Grave? 43, 87.

  19. 19.

    Leo Bersani , The Culture of Redemption (Cambridge and London: Harvard University Press, 1990), 86, 100.

  20. 20.

    Roland Barthes, The Rustle of Language (Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1989), 346.

  21. 21.

    Ibid.

  22. 22.

    Ibid., 349.

  23. 23.

    In Victor Burgin and Alexander Streitberger (ed.), Situational Aesthetics: Selected Writings by Victor Burgin (Leuven: Leuven University Press, 2009), xiii.

  24. 24.

    Jean-Bertrand Pontalis , Avant (Paris: Gallimard, 2012), 23.

  25. 25.

    Jean-Bertrand Pontalis , Fenêtres (Paris: Gallimard, 2000), 106.

  26. 26.

    Pontalis, Avant, 25.

  27. 27.

    Christopher Bollas , Cracking Up: The Work of Unconscious Experience (London: Routledge, 1995), 11.

  28. 28.

    Paul Auster, Man in the Dark (London: Faber and Faber, 2008), 2.

  29. 29.

    Paul Auster, The Invention of Solitude (London: Faber and Faber, 1982), 161.

  30. 30.

    Christopher Bollas , Free Association (Cambridge: Icon Books, 2002), 10.

  31. 31.

    See Pontalis, Avant, 50–51.

  32. 32.

    Auster, Man in the Dark, 15–22.

  33. 33.

    Ibid., 15–16.

  34. 34.

    See Christian Metz , The Imaginary Signifier: Psychoanalysis and the Cinema (London: Palgrave, 1982), 10.

  35. 35.

    Vittorio de Sica, Ladri di Biciclette [Bicycle Thieves or, in the United States, The Bicycle Thief] (ENIC, 1948), 35 mm.

  36. 36.

    Auster, Man in the Dark, 16.

  37. 37.

    Ibid.

  38. 38.

    Ibid.

  39. 39.

    Jean Renoir, La Grande Illusion (RAC, 1937), 35 mm.

  40. 40.

    Auster, Man in the Dark, 17–18.

  41. 41.

    Secondary identification —identification of the spectator with some identifiable feature of the characters on screen—clearly works in the other direction as well: in our experience and memory of film, characters assume subjective features that only we, as specific spectators, can project in them. Semiological film studies preferred to concentrate on the first kind of movement of identification , and on the spectator ’s primary identification with the camera, clearly because they allow to downplay the permeability of the space of film and to make film experience and the position of the spectator more intelligible.

  42. 42.

    Pontalis, Fenêtres, 110–111.

  43. 43.

    Auster, Man in the Dark, 118.

  44. 44.

    Ibid., 21–22.

  45. 45.

    Ibid., 153.

  46. 46.

    Ibid., 73.

  47. 47.

    Yasujirô Ozu, Tokyo Story (Shôchiku Eiga, 1953), 35 mm.

  48. 48.

    Auster, Man in the Dark, 73–79.

  49. 49.

    Ibid., 75.

  50. 50.

    Ibid., 79.

  51. 51.

    Ibid.

  52. 52.

    Ibid., 86.

  53. 53.

    Ibid., 102.

  54. 54.

    “Un homme parmi d’autres plongé le temps d’une séance dans le noir et vivant la vision de sa mémoire intime dans celle que le film lui propose.” Raymond Bellour, Le Corps du Cinéma: Hypnosis, Émotions, Animalités (Paris: P.O.L., 2009), 17. Translation mine.

  55. 55.

    Paul Auster, The Red Notebook (London: Faber and Faber, 1995), 111.

  56. 56.

    Ibid., 117.

  57. 57.

    See Bersani, The Culture of Redemption, 10.

  58. 58.

    Auster, The Red Notebook, 143–144.

Bibliography

  • Auster, Paul. The Invention of Solitude. London: Faber and Faber, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Auster, Paul. The Red Notebook. London: Faber and Faber, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Auster, Paul. Man in the Dark. London: Faber and Faber, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, James. The Devil Finds Work. London: Michael Joseph, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barthes, Roland. The Rustle of Language. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baudry, Jean-Louis. “The Apparatus.” Camera Obscura 1, no. 11 (1976): 104–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellour, Raymond. Le Corps du Cinéma: Hypnoses, Émotions, Animalités. Paris: P.O.L., 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bersani, Leo. The Culture of Redemption. Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press, 1990.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bersani, Leo. “Psychoanalysis and the Aesthetic Subject.” Critical Inquiry 32, no. 2 (2006): 161–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bersani, Leo. Is the Rectum a Grave? Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bersani, Leo, and Ulysse Dutoit. “Beauty’s Light.” October 82 (1997): 17–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bersani, Leo, and Ulysse Dutoit. Caravaggio’s Secrets. Cambridge and London: MIT Press, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bersani, Leo, and Ulysse Dutoit. Caravaggio. London: British Film Institute, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bersani, Leo, and Ulysse Dutoit. Forms of Being: Cinema, Aesthetics, Subjectivity. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bollas, Christopher. Cracking Up: The Work of Unconscious Experience. London: Routledge, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bollas, Christopher. Free Association. Cambridge: Icon Books, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgin, Victor, and Alexander Streitberger (eds.). Situational Aesthetics: Selected Writings by Victor Burgin. Leuven: Leuven University Press, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, Judith. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York and London: Routledge, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metz, Christian. The Imaginary Signifier: Psychoanalysis and the Cinema. London: Palgrave, 1982.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pontalis, Jean-Bertrand. Fenêtres. Paris: Gallimard, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pontalis, Jean-Bertrand. Avant. Paris: Gallimard, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rancière, Jacques. Le Philosophe et ses Pauvres. Paris: Flammarion, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, Kaja. World Spectators. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, Kaja. Flesh of My Flesh. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carlo Comanducci .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Comanducci, C. (2018). The Spectator as a History of Encounters. In: Spectatorship and Film Theory. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96743-1_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics