Abstract
René Descartes’ enduring contribution to philosophy, natural science and mathematics includes the unresolved residue of Cartesian dualism, as well as a singular ‘bottom-up’ interpretation of reductive logic sustained within the modern structure of the reductive natural science paradigm. Application of strong reductive logic leads to the perplexing reductive epiphenomenalism proposition.
Kurt Gödel’s two famous incompleteness theorems provide an argument through analogy, demonstrating that reductive epiphenomenalism of consciousness is a logical and demonstrably true ‘bottom-up’ reductive proposition; characterized by conceptual paradox that cannot be resolved from inside the modern reductive science paradigm using sustained singular ‘bottom-up’ reductive logic. The argument by analogy concludes reductive epiphenomenalism is an undecidable reductive proposition declaring strong reductive logic to be fundamentally incomplete.
Thomas Kuhn’s historical conception of a scientific revolution and modern explorations of contextual paradigm adaptation do not include descriptions of a limit on reductive logic associated with reductive incompleteness. One analogous implication of reductive incompleteness is the potential for an unresolvable and undecidable reductive proposition, stated in the paradigm and strong logic of reductive science, to become a resolvable and decidable reductive proposition within a closely related meta-reductive paradigm, preserving strong reductive logic but employing slightly different assumptions and premises. This opens the door to exploring functional adaptation of the reductive paradigm with the creation of adjacent possible meta-reductive paradigms.
Adjacent possible meta-reductive paradigms responding to reductive incompleteness, may be able to more closely mimic Nature’s inherent evolutionary logic, provide novel solutions to unresolved or anomalous reductive scientific problems, and clarify the relationship formal reductive incompleteness might have with the natural logic of evolving systems.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Abbott, R.: Emergence explained: abstractions: getting epiphenomena to do real work. Complexity 12(1), 13–26 (2006)
Abbott, R.: The reductionist blind spot. Complexity 14(5), 10–22 (2009)
Andersen, H., Hepburn, B.: Scientific method. In: Zalta, E.N. (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Summer edn. Stanford Metaphysics Research Laboratory, Stanford (2016). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2016/entries/scientific-method/
Barker-Plummer, D.: Turing machines. In: Zalta, E.N. (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Winter edn. Stanford Metaphysics Laboratory: Stanford University (2016). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2016/entries/turing-machine/
Beall, J., Glanzberg, M., Ripley, D.: Liar paradox. In: Zalta, E.N. (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Fall edn. Stanford Metaphysics Laboratory: Stanford University (2017). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2017/entries/liar-paradox/
Bechtel, W.: Looking down, around, and up: mechanistic explanation in psychology. Philos. Psychol. 22, 543–564 (2009)
Bird, A.: Thomas kuhn. In: Zalta, E.N. (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford Metaphysics Laboratory: Stanford University (2013). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2013/entries/thomas-kuhn/
Bolander, T.: Self-reference. In: Zalta, E.N. (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Fall edn. Stanford Metaphysics Laboratory: Stanford University (2017). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2017/entries/self-reference/
Boleyn-Fitzgerald, M.: Pictures of the Mind: What the New Neuroscience Tells Us About Who We Are. Pearson Education Inc. published as FT Press, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey (2010)
Brennan, A.: Necessary and sufficient conditions. In: Edward, N.Z (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Summer edn. Stanford Metaphysics Laboratory (2017). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2017/entries/necssary-sufficient/
Cantini, A.: Paradoxes and contemporary logic. In: Zalta, E.N. (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Fall edn. Metaphysics Lab, Stanford Univeristy, Stanford (2014). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2014/entries/paradoxes-contemporary-logic/
Casti, J.: The Halting Theorem (Theory of Computation). In: Five Golden Rules: Great Theories of 20th Century Mathematics–and Why They Matter, pp. 135–180. John Wiley and Sons Inc., New York (1996)
Casti, J., DePauli, W.: Gödel: A Life of Logic, pp. 48–52. Perseus Publishing, Cambridge (2000)
Casti, J.L., DePauli, W.: Godel: A Life of Logic, pp. 48–49. Perseus Publishing (2000a)
Casti, J.L., DePauli, W.: Gödel: A Life of Logic. Perseus Publishing (2000b)
Cat, J.: The unity of science. In: Zalta, E.N. (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopaedia of Philosophy, Fall edn. (2017). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2017/entries/scientific-unity/
Chalmers, D.: Facing up to the hard problem of consciousness. J. Conscious. Stud. 2, 200–219 (1995)
Chalmers, D.: The Conscious Mind. In Search of a Fundamental Theory. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1996)
Chalmers, D.: Facing up to the problem of consciousness. In: Shear, J. (ed.) Explaining Consciousness, pp. 9–32. MIT Press, Cambridge (1997)
Corning, P.A.: The re-emergence of emergence: a venerable concept in search of a theory. Complexity 7(6), 18–30 (2002)
Cottingham, J.G.: Descartes. In: Gregory, R.L. (ed.) Oxford Companion to the Mind, p. 189. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1988)
Craver, C., Tabery, J.: Mechanisms in science. In: Zalta, E.N. (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Spring edn. Stanford Metaphysics Laboratory: Stanford University (2017). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2017/entries/science-mechanisms/
Dennett, D.C.: Darwin’s Dangerous Idea: Evolution and the Meanings of Life, pp. 80–85. Simon and Schuster, New York (1995)
Dennett, D.C.: Sweet Dreams: Philosophical Obstacles to a Science of Consciouness. A Bradford Book, The MIT Press, Cambridg, Massachussetts (2005)
Descartes, R.: Discourse on the Method of Rightly Conducting the Reason, and Seeking Truth in the Sciences: Gutenberg EBook Project (1637)
Ellis, G.: How Can Physics Underlie the Mind: Top-Down Causation in the Human Context. Springer, Heidelberg (2016)
Fodor, J., Piattelli-Palmarini, M.: What Darwin got wrong, pp. 153–163. Farrar, Straus and Giroux Publishers, New York (2010)
Gödel, K.: Über formal unentscheidbare Sätze der Principia Mathematica und verwandter Systeme. Monatshefte für Mathematik und Physik 38, 173–198 (1931)
Gödel, K.: On formally undecidable propositions of principia mathematica and related systems (B. Meltzer, Trans.). In: Braithwaite, R. (ed.) Electronic Reprint Edition, Introduction by D.R. Hofstadher. Basic Books, New York (1992)
Gödel, K.: On formally undecidable propositions of principia mathematica and related systems. Braithewaite, R.B. (Introduction), Meltzer, B. (Translator). Dover Publications, New York. Original publication, New York, Basic Books (1962). Electronic Reprint accessed at: jacqkrol.x10.mx on June 3, 2018 and accessed at: monoskop.org on June 3, 2018
Good, I.J.: A note on Richard’s paradox. Mind 75(299), 431 (1966)
Grim, P.: Philosophy of Mind: Brains, Consciousness and Thinking Machines. The Great Courses, The Teaching Company, Chantilly, Virginia (2008)
Hall, N.: David Lewis’s metaphysics. In: Zalta, E.N. (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Winter edn. Stanford Metaphysics Laboratory, Stanford University. (2016). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2016/entries/lewis-metaphysics/
Hansson, S.O.: Science and pseudo-science. In: Zalta, E.N. (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Summer edn. Stanford University, Stanford Metaphysics Laboratory (2017). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2017/entries/pseudo-science/
Harari, Y.: Homo Deus: A Brief History of Tomorrow. United Kingdom, Canada: Signal Books, an imprint of McClelland & Stewart, A Division of Penguin Random House Canada (2016)
Harris, S.: Free Will. Free Press, A Division of Simon and Schuster Inc., New York, London (2012)
Hatfield, G.: René descartes. In: Zalta, E.N. (ed.) Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford University: Stanford Metaphysics Laboratory (2016). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2016/entries/descartes/
Hawking, S.: Kurt Gödel in God Created the Integers: Mathematical Breakthroughs that Changed History, p. 1265. Running Press Book Publishers, Philadelphia (2007a)
Hawking, S.: Kurt Gödel in God Created the Integers: Mathematical Breakthroughs that Changed History, p. 1258. Running Press Book Publishers, Philadelphia (2007b)
Hodges, A.: Alan turing. In: Zalta, E.N. (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Winter edn. Stanford: Metaphysics Research Laboratory, Stanford University (2013). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2013/entries/turing/
Hofweber, T.: Logic and ontology. In: Zalta, E.N. (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Winter edn. Stanford Metaphysics Laboratory, Stanford University (2017). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2017/entries/logic-ontology/
Humphreys, P.: Emergence: A Philosophical Account. Oxford University Press, New York (2016)
Irvine, A.D.: Principia mathematica. In: Zalta, E.N. (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Winter edn. Stanford Metaphysics Laboratory, Stanford University (2016). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2016/entries/principia-mathematica/
Kauffman, S.: The Origins of Order: Self-Organization and Selection in Evolution. Oxford, Oxford University Press, New York (1993)
Kauffman, S.: Reinventing the Sacred: A New View of Science, Reason and Religion. Basic Books. A Member of the Perseus Group, New York (2008)
Kauffman, S.: Humanity in a Creative Universe. Oxford University Press, New York (2016)
Kennedy, J.: Kurt Gödel. In: Zalta, E.N. (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Winter edn. Stanford Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University (2016). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2016/entries/goedel/
Kuhn, T.: The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1962)
Kuhn, T.: The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 50th Anniversary. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (2012)
Laughlin, R.B.: A Different Universe (Reinventing Physics from Bottom Down), pp. 31–32. Basic Books, A member of the Perseus Book Group, New York (2006)
Laughlin, R.B.: A Different Universe (Reinventing Physics from Bottom Down), p. 247. Basic Books, A Member of the Perseus Book Group, New York (2006b)
Libet, B.J.: Do we have free will. J. Conscious. Stud. 6(8–9), 47–57 (1999)
Miller, J.H., Page, S.E.: Complex Adaptive Systems: An Introduction to Computational Models of Social Life. Princeton University Press, Princeton and Oxford (2007)
Mitchell, S.D.: Biological Complexity and Integrative Pluralism. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2003)
Mitchell, S.D.: Unsimple Truths: Science. Chicago, Chicago University Press, Complexity and Policy (2009)
Nagel, E., Newman, J.R. (1956, reprint 2000) Goedel’s Proof, pp. 1668–1695. In: Newman, J. (ed) (1956, reprint 2000). The World of Mathematics, vol. 3: Parts viii-xvii. Dover Publishers Inc., Mineola, New York
Nagel, E.: The Structure of Science. Problems in the Logic of Explanation. Harcourt, Brace & World, Inc., New York (1961)
Nagel, E., Newman, J.: Gödel ‘s Proof. In: Hofstadter, D.R. (ed.) (Revised and Edited with a new Foreword by D.R. Hofstadter editor), pp. Foreward and Introduction. New York and London: New York University Press. (Reprinted from: Electronic EBook) (2001)
Nagel, T.: Mind and Cosmos: Why The Materialist Neo-Darwinian Conception of Nature is Almost Certainly False. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2012)
Nickles, T.: Scientific revolutions. In: Zalta, E.N. (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Winter edn. Stanford Metaphysics Laboratory. Stanford University (2017). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2017/entries/scientific-revolutions/
Okasha, S.: Philosophy of Science: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2002)
Popper, K.: The Logic of Scientific Discovery. Hutchinson, London (1959)
Pylkkanen, P.: Mind, Matter and the Implicate Order, p. 2. Springer-Verlag Publishing, Heidelberg
Raatikainen, P.: Gödel’s incompleteness theorems. In: Zalta, E.N. (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Spring edn. Stanford: Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University (2015). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2015/entries/goedel-incompleteness/
Raatikainen, P.: Gödel’s incompleteness theorems, p. 2. In: Zalta, E.N. (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Spring edn. Stanford Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University (2015). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2015/entries/goedel-incompleteness/
Robinson, W.: Epiphenomenalism. In: Zalta, E.N. (ed.) Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Spring edn., p. 1 (2015a). http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2015/entries/epiphenomenalism/
Robinson, W.: Epiphenomenalism. In: Zalta, E.N. (ed.) Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Spring edn. (2015b). http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2015/entries/epiphenomenalism/
Schwartz, J.M., Begley, S.: The Mind & The Brain: Neuroplasticity and the Power of Mental Force. Harper Perennial Publishers, New York (2002)
Scott, A.: Physicalism, chaos and reductionism. In: Tuszynski, J.E. (ed.) The Emerging Physics of Consciousness, pp. 171–192. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)
Scott, A.C.: The Nonlinear Universe: Chaos, Emergence, Life, pp. 277–301. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)
Scott, R.: Letter to editor. Complexity 2(6), 10 (1997)
Scott, J.R.: Series of papers in preparation. Presented as Poster presentation at 2018 ICCS conference in Boston Massachussets. Present paper accepted for proceedings of 2018 ICCS conference (2018)
Seager, W.: Natural Fabrications: Science, Emergence and Consciousness. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)
Seager, W.: Natural Fabrications: Science, Emergence and Consciousness, pp. 189–210. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)
Shapiro, Y., Scott, J.R.: Dynamical systems therapy (DST): complex adaptive system in psychiatry and psychotherapy. In: Mitleton-Kelly, E., Paraskevas, A., Day, C. (eds.) Handbook of Research Methods in Complexity Science, pp. 567–589. Edgar Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham (2018)
Siegel, D.J.: The Developing Mind: Toward a Neurobiology of Interpersonal Experience. The Guilford Press, New York (1999)
Siegel, D.J.: Pocket Guide to Interpersonal Neurobiology: An Integrated Handbook of the Mind. W.W Norton Inc., New York (2012)
Siegel, D.J.: Mind: A Journey to the Heart of Being Human. W.W. Norton & Company, New York (2016)
Steup, M.: Epistemology. In: Zalta, E.N. (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Fall edn. Stanford Metaphysics Laboratory, Stanford University (2017). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2017/entries/epistemology/
Stevens, A.: Private Myths: Dreams and Dreaming, pp. 297–318. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1995)
Tabery, J.: Beyond Versus: The Struggle to Understand the Interaction of Nature and Nurture. The MIT Press, Cambridge (2014)
Unger, R.M., Smolin, L.: The Singular Universe and the Reality of Time: A Proposal in Natural Philosophy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2015)
van Riel, R., Van Gulick, R.: Scientific reduction. In: Zalta, E.N. (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Winter edn. Stanford Metaphysics Laboratory, Stanford University (2016). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2016/entries/scientific-reduction/
Wolfram, S.: A New Kind of Science, p. 846. Wolfram Media Inc., Champaign (2002)
Yanofsky, N.S.: Paradoxes, contradictions, and the limits of science. Am. Sci. 104(3), 166–173 (2016)
Zach, R.: Hilbert’s program. In: Zalta, E.N. (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy Spring Edition ed. Stanford Metaphysics Laboratory: Stanford University (2016). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2016/entries/hilbert-program/
Acknowledgments
Dr. Norman Davies, Dr. Sol Levin, Dr. William Dewhurst, Dr. James McMullin, Dr. Jack Tuszynski, Dr. Don Page, and the steadfast support of Dr. Yakov Shapiro. Any errors or omissions in this paper are entirely my own responsibility.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Rowan Scott, J. (2018). Descartes, Gödel and Kuhn: Epiphenomenalism Defines a Limit on Reductive Logic. In: Morales, A., Gershenson, C., Braha, D., Minai, A., Bar-Yam, Y. (eds) Unifying Themes in Complex Systems IX. ICCS 2018. Springer Proceedings in Complexity. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96661-8_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96661-8_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-96660-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-96661-8
eBook Packages: Physics and AstronomyPhysics and Astronomy (R0)