Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Impact of Collaboration on Green Competitive Advantage in Europe’s Largest Petrochemical Cluster

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Sustainable Port Clusters and Economic Development

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Maritime Economics ((PSME))

  • 348 Accesses

Abstract

A large number of studies have looked into the impact of a firm’s localization in a geographical cluster. In one of the most well-known, Porter (Harvard Business Review 76: 77–90, 1998) explained that fierce competition within a cluster improves cluster firms’ performance. Folta et al. (Journal of Business Venturing 21: 217–242, 2006) looked at the impact of cluster size on cluster firms’ innovation rate, alliance partners and private investors. They found increasing individual performances until the cluster consisted of about 65 firms, after which the effect reversed. Decarolis and Deeds (Strategic Management Journal 20: 953–968, 1999) observed a positive link between cluster membership and the firm’s financial performance. Clusters are mostly considered as fruitful environments to generate competitive advantage because they increase productivity, stimulate innovation and attract new firms (Porter 1998, Economic Development Quarterly 14: 15–34, 2000; Marshall in Principles of economics. Macmillan, London, 1920). Other advantages of cluster membership are an increased likelihood that the firm internationalizes and, hence, results in higher international sales (Fernhaber et al. in The impact of geographic location on the internationalization of new ventures, 2003). However, Porter (1998) indicated that a cluster needs at least ten years to establish a certain depth and create a competitive advantage, indicating that potentially not all benefits are immediately and automatically generated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Andersson, L. M., & Bateman, T. S. (2000). Individual environmental initiative: Championing natural environmental issues in U.S. business organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 548–570. https://doi.org/10.2307/1556355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bansal, P. (2003). From issues to actions: The importance of individual concerns and organizational values in responding to natural environmental issues. Organization Science, 14, 510–527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bansal, P., & Roth, K. (2000). Why companies go green: A model of ecological responsiveness. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 717–736.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17, 99–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barney, J. B. (2001). Is the resource-based “view” a useful perspective for strategic management research? Yes. Academy of Management Review, 26, 41–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron, D. P. (1995). Integrated strategy: Market and nonmarket components. California Management Review, 37, 47–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Branzei, O., Ursacki-Bryant, T. J., Vertinsky, I., & Zhang, W. (2004). The formation of green strategies in Chinese firms: Matching corporate environmental responses and individual principles. Strategic Management Journal, 25, 1075–1095.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buysse, K., & Verbeke, A. (2003). Proactive environmental strategies: A stakeholder management perspective. Strategic Management Journal, 24, 453–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cordano, M. C., & Frieze, I. H. (2000). Pollution reduction preferences of U.S. environmental managers: Applying Ajzen’s theory of planned behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 627–641.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Lloyd. (2010). Annual Port of Antwerp. Antwerp: De Lloyd N.V.

    Google Scholar 

  • Decarolis, D. M., & Deeds, D. L. (1999). The impact of stocks and flows of organizational knowledge on firm performance: An empirical investigation of the biotechnology industry. Strategic Management Journal, 20, 953–968.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, T. J., & Judge, W. Q. (1995). Integrating the natural environment into the strategic planning process: An empirical assessment. Academy of Management Best Paper Proceedings, 1, 475–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dowell, G., Hart, S., & Yeung, B. (2000). Do corporate global environmental standards create or destroy market value? Management Science, 46, 1059–1074.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, J. H., & Singh, H. (1998). The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23, 660–679.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernhaber, S. A., Gilbert, B. A., & McDougall, P. P. (2003). The impact of geographic location on the internationalization of new ventures. Babson Kauffman Entrepreneurship Research Conference, Boston, 5–8 June 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiol, C. M. (1994). Consensus, diversity, and learning in organizations. Organization Science, 5, 403–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiol, C. M., & Lyles, M. A. (1985). Organizational learning. Academy of Management Review, 10, 803–816.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folta, T. B., Cooper, A. C., & Baik, Y. (2006). Geographic cluster size and firm performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 21, 217–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • González-Benito, J., & González-Benito, O. (2005). Environmental proactivity and business performance: An empirical analysis. Omega, 33, 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant, R. M. (1991). The resource-based theory of competitive advantage: Implications for strategy formulation. California Management Review, 33, 114–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart, S. L. (1995). A natural-resource-based view of the firm. Academy of Management Review, 20, 986–1014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart, S. L., & Ahuja, G. (1996). Does it pay to be green? An empirical examination of the relationship between emission reduction and firm performance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 5, 30–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henriques, I., & Sadorsky, P. (1999). The relationship between environmental commitment and managerial perceptions of stakeholder importance. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 87–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoen, A. (2001). Clusters: Determinants and effects. CPB Memorandum, CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis. http://www.cpb.nl/sites/default/files/publicaties/download/memo17.pdf. Accessed on April 1, 2013.

  • Klassen, R. D., & McLaughlin, C. P. (1996). The impact of environmental management on firm performance. Management Science, 42, 1199–1214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klassen, R. D., & Whybark, D. C. (1999). Environmental management in operations: The selection of environmental technologies. Decision Sciences, 30, 601–631.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krugman, P. (1991). Increasing returns and economic geography. Journal of Political Economy, 99, 483–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lavie, D. (2006). The competitive advantage of interconnected firms: An extension of the resource-based view. Academy of Management Journal, 31, 638–658.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, A. (1920). Principles of economics. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell, J., Rotherberg, S., Briscoe, F., & Marcus, A. (1997). Green schemes: Corporate environmental strategies and their implementation. California Management Review, 39, 118–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McEvily, B., & Zaheer, A. (1999). Bridging ties: A source of firm heterogenity in competitive capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 20, 1133–1156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, C. J. (2002). The profitable correlation between environmental and financial performance: A review of the research. Seattle, WA: Light Green Advisors.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noda, T., & Bower, J. L. (1996). Strategy making as iterated processes of resource allocation. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 159–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parise, S., & Casher, A. (2003). Alliance portfolios: Designing and managing your network of business-partner relationships. Academy of Management Executive, 17, 25–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Port of Rotterdam. (2010). Facts & figures Rotterdam energy port and petrochemical cluster. Rotterdam: Port of Rotterdam Authority.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E. (1998). Clusters and the new economics of competition. Harvard Business Review, 76, 77–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E. (2000). Location, competition, and economic development: Local clusters in a global economy. Economic Development Quarterly, 14, 15–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramus, C. A., & Steger, U. (2000). The roles of supervisory support behaviors and evironmental policy in employee “Eco initiatives” at leading-edge European companies. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 605–626.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roh, H. S. (2007). Port cluster systems: Supporting port logistics processes. Seoul: Jongkum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rueda-Manzanares, A., Aragón-Correa, J. A., & Sharma, S. (2008). The Influence of stakeholders on the environmental strategy of service firms: The moderating effects of complexity, uncertainty and munificence. British Journal of Management, 19, 185–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, S. (2000). Managerial interpretations and organizational context as predictors of corporate choice of environmental strategy. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 681–697.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, S., & Henriques, I. (2005). Stakeholder influences on sustainability practices in the Canadian forest products industry. Strategic Management Journal, 26, 159–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, S., & Vredenburg, H. (1998). Proactive corporate environmental strategy and the development of competitively valuable organizational capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 19, 729–753.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, S., Pablo, A., & Vredenburg, H. (1999). Corporate environmental responsiveness strategies: The importance of issue interpretation and organizational context. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 35, 87–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Staw, B. M. (1975). Attribution of the “causes” of performance: A general alternative interpretation of cross-sectional research on organizations. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 13, 414–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verbeke, A., Bowen, F., & Sellers, M. (2006). Corporate environmental strategy: Extending the natural resource-based view of the firm. Academy of Management Best Paper Proceedings, 1, A1–A6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verbeke, A., & Vanden Bussche, S. (2005). Regional and global strategies in the intercontinental passenger airline industry: The rise of alliance specific advantages. In A. Verbeke (Ed.), Internalization, international diversification and the multinational enterprise: Essays in honour of Alan M. Rugman. Oxford: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wassmer, U., & Dussauge, P. (2011). Value creation in alliance portfolios: The benefits and costs of network resource interdependencies. European Management Review, 8, 47–64. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-4762.2011.01003.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wassmer, U., & Dussauge, P. (2012). Network resource stocks and flows: How do alliance portfolios affect the value of new alliance formations? Strategic Management Journal, 33(7), 871–883.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wassmer, U., Paquin, R., & Sharma, S. (2012). The engagement of firms in environmental collaborations: Existing contributions and future directions. Business and Society, 52, 1–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wassmer, U., Paquin, R., & Sharma, S. (2014). The engagement of firms in environmental collaborations: Existing contributions and future directions. Business & Society, 53(6), 754–786.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium

    Tim Jans

  2. Department of Business, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium

    Elvira Haezendonck

  3. Haskayne School of Business, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada

    Alain Verbeke

  4. Department of Business, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium

    Alain Verbeke

  5. Henley Business School, University of Reading, Reading, UK

    Alain Verbeke

Authors
  1. Tim Jans
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Elvira Haezendonck
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Alain Verbeke
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elvira Haezendonck .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Business, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium

    Elvira Haezendonck

  2. Haskayne School of Business, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada

    Alain Verbeke

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Jans, T., Haezendonck, E., Verbeke, A. (2018). The Impact of Collaboration on Green Competitive Advantage in Europe’s Largest Petrochemical Cluster. In: Haezendonck, E., Verbeke, A. (eds) Sustainable Port Clusters and Economic Development. Palgrave Studies in Maritime Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96658-8_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96658-8_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-96657-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-96658-8

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation