Skip to main content

MRI of Perianal Crohn’s Disease

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Cross-Sectional Imaging in Crohn’s Disease
  • 542 Accesses

Abstract

Perianal disease is a common complication in Crohn’s disease and imaging helps the clinician in the diagnosis and decisions regarding therapeutic strategy. Pelvic MRI is the recommended imaging modality because of its accuracy and advantages compared to other imaging techniques. Specific sequences and planes are mandatory for adequate assessment of perianal Crohn’s disease. It is important to understand the perianal anatomy to adequately describe the anatomical location and extension of fistula. Other aspects in the assessment of perianal disease on MRI include the assessment of fistula activity, presence of abscesses and proctitis, and assessment of response to therapy. This chapter provides an overview of technical MRI features, pelvic anatomy, and different aspects of perianal Crohn’s disease on MRI for an adequate diagnostic workup.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Schwartz DA, Loftus EV, Tremaine WJ, Panaccione R, Harmsen WS, Zinsmeister AR, et al. The natural history of fistulizing Crohn’s disease in Olmsted County, Minnesota. Gastroenterology. 2002;122:875–80. https://doi.org/10.1053/gast.2002.32362.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Eglinton TW, Barclay ML, Gearry RB, Frizelle FA. The spectrum of perianal Crohn’s disease in a population-based cohort. Dis Colon Rectum. 2012;55:773–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0b013e31825228b0.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Gecse KB, Bemelman W, Kamm MA, Stoker J, Khanna R, Ng SC, et al. A global consensus on the classification, diagnosis and multidisciplinary treatment of perianal fistulising Crohn’s disease. Gut. 2014;63:1381–92. https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2013-306709.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Panes J, Bouhnik Y, Reinisch W, Stoker J, Taylor SA, Baumgart DC, et al. Imaging techniques for assessment of inflammatory bowel disease: joint ECCO and ESGAR evidence-based consensus guidelines. J Crohns Colitis. 2013;7:556–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crohns.2013.02.020.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kim DH, Carucci LR, Baker ME, Cash BD, Dillman JR, Feig BW, et al. ACR appropriateness criteria Crohn disease. J Am Coll Radiol. 2015;12:1048–1057.e4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2015.07.005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Maaser C, Sturm M, Vavricka SR, Kucharzik T, Fiorino G, Annese V, et al. ECCO-ESGAR Guideline for Diagnostic Assessment in IBD Part 1: Initial diagnosis, monitoring of known IBD, detections of complications. J Crohns Colitis. 2018 (in press). https://doi.org/10.1093/eccojcc/jjy113.

  7. Schwartz DA, Wiersema MJ, Dudiak KM, Fletcher JG, Clain JE, Tremaine WJ, et al. A comparison of endoscopic ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging, and exam under anesthesia for evaluation of Crohn’s perianal fistulas. Gastroenterology. 2001;121:1064–72. https://doi.org/10.1053/gast.2001.28676.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Buchanan GN, Halligan S, Bartram CI, Williams AB, Tarroni D, Cohen CRG. Clinical examination, endosonography, and MR imaging in preoperative assessment of fistula in ano: comparison with outcome-based reference standard. Radiology. 2004;233:674–81. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2333031724.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Siddiqui MRS, Ashrafian H, Tozer P, Daulatzai N, Burling D, Hart A, et al. A diagnostic accuracy meta-analysis of endoanal ultrasound and MRI for perianal fistula assessment. Dis Colon Rectum. 2012;55:576–85. https://doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0b013e318249d26c.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Maconi G, Tonolini M, Monteleone M, Bezzio C, Furfaro F, Villa C, et al. Transperineal perineal ultrasound versus magnetic resonance imaging in the assessment of perianal Crohn’s disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2013;19:2737–43. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.MIB.0000436274.95722.e5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Parks AG. Pathogenesis and treatment of fistula-in-ano. Br Med J. 1961;1:463–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hughes LE. Surgical pathology and management of anorectal Crohn’s disease. J R Soc Med. 1978;71:644–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/014107687807100904.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Halligan S, Stoker J. Imaging of fistula in ano. Radiology. 2006;239:18–33. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2391041043.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Horsthuis K, Stoker J. MRI of perianal Crohn’s disease. Am J Roentgenol. 2004;183:1309–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Dwarkasing S, Hussain SM, Hop WCJ, Krestin GP. Anovaginal fistulas: evaluation with endoanal MR imaging. Radiology. 2004;231:123–8. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2311021190.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Sturm A, Maaser C, Calabrese E, Annese V, Fiorino G, Kucharzik T, et al. ECCO-ESGAR Guideline for Diagnostic Assessment in IBD Part 2: IBD scores and general principles and technical aspects. J Crohns Colitis. 2018 (in press). https://doi.org/10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjy114.

  17. Dohan A, Eveno C, Oprea R, Pautrat K, Placé V, Pocard M, et al. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging for the diagnosis of abscess complicating fistula-in-ano: preliminary experience. Eur Radiol. 2014;24:2906–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-014-3302-y.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Hori M, Oto A, Orrin S, Suzuki K, Baron RL. Diffusion-weighted MRI: a new tool for the diagnosis of fistula in ano. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2009;30:1021–6. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.21934.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Horsthuis K, Lavini C, Bipat S, Stokkers P, Stoker J. Perianal Crohn disease: evaluation of dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging as an indicator of disease activity. Radiology. 2009;251:380–7. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2512072128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ziech MLW, Lavini C, Bipat S, Ponsioen CY, Spijkerboer AM, Stokkers PCF, et al. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in determining disease activity in perianal fistulizing Crohn disease: a pilot study. Am J Roentgenol. 2013;200:170–7. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.11.8276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Pinson C, Dolores M, Cruypeninck Y, Koning E, Dacher JN, Savoye G, et al. Magnetization transfer ratio for the assessment of perianal fistula activity in Crohn’s disease. Eur Radiol. 2017;27:80–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-016-4350-2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Parks AG, Gordon PH, Hardcastle JD. A classification of fistula-in-ano. Br J Surg. 1976;63:1–12.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Samaan MA, Puylaert CAJ, Levesque BG, Zou GY, Stitt L, Taylor SA, et al. The development of a magnetic resonance imaging index for fistulising Crohn’s disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2017;46:516–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.14190.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Sandborn WJ, Fazio VW, Feagan BG, Hanauer SB. American Gastroenterological Association technical review on perianal Crohn’s disease. Gastroenterology. 2003;125:1508–30. https://doi.org/10.1053/S0016-5085(03)01367-2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Morris J, Spencer JA, Ambrose NS. MR imaging classification of perianal fistulas and its implications for patient management. Radiographics. 2000;20:623–35. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiographics.20.3.g00mc15623.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Van Assche G, Vanbeckevoort D, Bielen D, Coremans G, Aerden I, Noman M, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of the effects of infliximab on perianal fistulizing Crohn’s disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 2003;98:332–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9270(02)05909-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Rociu E, Stoker J, Eijkemans MJ, Laméris JS. Normal anal sphincter anatomy and age- and sex-related variations at high-spatial-resolution endoanal MR imaging. Radiology. 2000;217:395–401. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.217.2.r00nv13395.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Tutein Nolthenius CJ, Bipat S, Mearadji B, Spijkerboer AM, Ponsioen CY, Montauban van Swijndregt AD, et al. MRI characteristics of proctitis in Crohn’s disease on perianal MRI. Abdom Radiol. 2016;41:1918–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-016-0802-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Ng SC, Plamondon S, Gupta A, Burling D, Swatton A, Vaizey CJ, et al. Prospective evaluation of anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy guided by magnetic resonance imaging for Crohn’s perineal fistulas. Am J Gastroenterol. 2009;104:2973–86. https://doi.org/10.1038/ajg.2009.509.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Karmiris K, Bielen D, Vanbeckevoort D, Vermeire S, Coremans G, Rutgeerts P, et al. Long-term monitoring of infliximab therapy for perianal fistulizing Crohn’s disease by using magnetic resonance imaging. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011;9:130–136.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2010.10.022.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Horsthuis K, Ziech MLW, Bipat S, Spijkerboer AM, de Bruine-Dobben AC, Hommes DW, et al. Evaluation of an MRI-based score of disease activity in perianal fistulizing Crohn’s disease. Clin Imaging. 2011;35:360–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinimag.2010.09.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Stoker J, Rociu E, Zwamborn AW, Schouten WR, Laméris JS. Endoluminal MR imaging of the rectum and anus: technique, applications, and pitfalls. Radiographics. 1999;19:383–98. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiographics.19.2.g99mr01383.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Horsthuis K, Bipat S, Stokkers PCF, Stoker J. Magnetic resonance imaging for evaluation of disease activity in Crohn’s disease: a systematic review. Eur Radiol. 2009;19:1450–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-008-1287-0.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Taylor SA, Halligan S, Bartram CI. Pilonidal sinus disease: MR imaging distinction from fistula in ano. Radiology. 2003;226:662–7. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2263011758.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Monnier L, Dohan A, Amara N, Zagdanski AM, Drame M, Soyer P, et al. Anoperineal disease in Hidradenitis Suppurativa: MR imaging distinction from perianal Crohn’s disease. Eur Radiol. 2017;27:4100–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-017-4776-1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kyra L. van Rijn .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

van Rijn, K.L., Stoker, J. (2019). MRI of Perianal Crohn’s Disease. In: Rimola, J. (eds) Cross-Sectional Imaging in Crohn’s Disease. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96586-4_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96586-4_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-96585-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-96586-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics