Skip to main content

Scientism and Utopia: New Atheism as a Fundamentalist Reaction to Relativism

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Relativism and Post-Truth in Contemporary Society

Abstract

The New Atheism movement has generally been understood as a reaction to fundamentalism, but LeDrew argues that it is just as importantly a reaction to two other features of late modern culture: multiculturalism or cultural relativism (in the realm of social policy) and ‘postmodernism’ or epistemic relativism (in the intellectual sphere), which are both perceived as challenges to scientific authority. This chapter focuses on the atheist reaction to relativism specifically in its relation to the social sciences, which it sees as shaped by the influence of postmodernism and thus an illegitimate source of knowledge. The rejection of social science in the atheist movement is a response to the fear that the historical and comparative methods of the social sciences are capable of relativizing not only the social world but the production of scientific knowledge by demonstrating their historically contingent and socially constructed nature. The chapter explores two strategies the atheist movement has adopted: undermining the social sciences as a whole by advancing evolutionary psychology as an alternative and superior form of social science and a sacralization of science.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Brekke, T. 2011. Fundamentalism: Prophecy and Protest in an Age of Globalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cimino, R., and C. Smith. 2014. Atheist Awakening: Secular Activism and Community in America. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Davie, G. 2013. The Sociology of Religion: A Critical Agenda. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins, R. 2006. The God Delusion. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennett, D. 2006. Breaking the Spell: Religion as a Natural Phenomenon. New York: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eagleton, T. 2009. Reason, Faith, and Revolution: Reflections on the God Debate. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ecklund, E.H. 2010. Science vs. Religion: What Scientists Really Think. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenstadt, S. 1999. Fundamentalism, Sectarianism and Revolutions: The Jacobin Dimension of Modernity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorski, P.S. 1990. Scientism, Interpretation and Criticism. Zygon 25 (3): 279–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, S.K. 2015. Inventing Christian America: The Myth of the Religious Founding. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gross, P.R., and N. Levitt. 1994. Higher Superstition: The Academic Left and Its Quarrels with Science. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. 1971. Knowledge and Human Interests. London: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, S. 2004. The End of Faith: Religion, Terror and the Future of Reason. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2006. Head-in-the-Sand Liberals. Los Angeles Times, September 18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedges, C. 2009. When Atheism Becomes Religion: America’s New Fundamentalists. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Held, D. 1980. Introduction to Critical Theory: Horkheimer to Habermas. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hitchens, C. 2007. God is Not Great: How Religion Poisons Everything. Toronto: Emblem.

    Google Scholar 

  • LeDrew, S. 2015. The Evolution of Atheism: The Politics of a Modern Movement. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, R.G. 2008. Science and Scientism in Nineteenth-Century Europe. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, A. 1996. Science Wars. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokal, A., and J. Bricmont. 1998. Fashionable Nonsense: Postmodern Intellectuals’ Abuse of Science. New York: Picador.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stenmark, M. 1997. What Is Scientism? Religious Studies 33 (1): 15–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, D.K. 2012. God’s Own Party: The Making of the Christian Right. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, E.O. 1975. Sociobiology: The New Synthesis. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

LeDrew, S. (2018). Scientism and Utopia: New Atheism as a Fundamentalist Reaction to Relativism. In: Stenmark, M., Fuller, S., Zackariasson, U. (eds) Relativism and Post-Truth in Contemporary Society. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96559-8_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics