Abstract
In the new-generation smart mobility paradigm, Mobility-as-a-Service (MaaS) systems have shown the most potential to offer integrated mobility platforms. MaaS is essentially an amalgamation of services tailored to match individuals’ diverse travel demands, many of which are demand-responsive transit (DRT) or DRT-like, addressing the much-needed last-mile problem of transit systems. Managing a DRT system could be a simple first step in understanding the governance of MaaS, as the two types of system share the common features of flexibility and individualistic, online platform-based service provision. With that view, we deliberate this exploration here, reflecting on the governance of a DRT case study. We borrow from the schools of transition management and industrial economics to elaborate our understanding. Using the framework of the Multi-level Perspective (MLP), we investigate the drivers and barriers for the diffusion of DRT through the (transit) regime. The main drivers of DRTs are found to be the willingness of local governments and transit operators to implement DRT, whereas the main barriers stem from infrastructure, technology, and market practices. Alignment among the regime elements remains largely partial, which is consistent with our conceptualization of MaaS governance challenges. This research adds to the literature by offering a comprehensive foundation exercise to reflect on the governance of innovative mobility services.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The process is described in a short video in the Breng flex Web site (in Dutch) https://www.breng.nl/breng-flex/1411.
- 2.
Detailed infographics of the survey can be accessed here (in Dutch) http://www.brengkenniscentrum.nl/blog/wat-vinden-reizigers-van-breng-flex/.
- 3.
Abel was the first fully electrical fleet-operated shared taxi service based in Amsterdam, which was discontinued in 2017 (after operating for almost two-years) on account of market saturation of taxi services.
References
Ali A (2017) BrengFlex: how efficient is it from a user’s perspective? Radboud University
Alonso-González MG, Liu T, Cats O, van Oort N, Hoogendoorn S (2018) The potential of demand responsive transport as a complement to public transport: an assessment framework and an empirical evaluation. In: 97th annual meeting of transportation research board. Washington D.C
Amirgholy M, Gonzales EJ (2016) Demand responsive transit systems with time-dependent demand: user equilibrium, system optimum, and management strategy. Transp Res Part B: Methodol 92:234–252
Aturupane C, Djankov S, Hoekman B (1999) Horizontal and vertical intra-industry trade between Eastern Europe and the European Union. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 135(1):62–81
Bauer HJ (1971) Case study of a demand-responsive transportation system. Highway Research Board, pp 171–124
Conrad K (2005) Price competition and product differentiation when consumers care for the environment. Environ Resour Econ 31(1):1–19
Docherty I, Marsden G, Anable J (2017) The governance of smart mobility. Transp Res Part A: Policy Pract
Ebrahimi S, Sharmeen F, Meurs H (2018) Innovative business architectures (BAs) for Mobility as a Service (MaaS)-exploration, assessment, and categorization using operational MaaS Cases. In: 97th annual meeting of transportation research board. Washington D.C
Fanti L (2013) Cross-ownership and unions in a Cournot duopoly: when profits reduce with horizontal product differentiation. Jpn World Econ 27:34–40
Gabszwicz JJ, Thisse J-F (1986) On the nature of competition with differentiated products. Econ J 160–172
Geels FW (2002) Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case-study. Res Policy 31(8–9):1257–1274
Geels FW (2004) From sectoral systems of innovation to socio-technical systems: Insights about dynamics and change from sociology and institutional theory. Res Policy 33(6–7):897–920
Geels FW (2011) The multi-level perspective on sustainability transitions: responses to seven criticisms. Environ Innov Societal Transitions 1(1):24–40
Geels FW (2012) A socio-technical analysis of low-carbon transitions: introducing the multi-level perspective into transport studies. J Transp Geogr 24:471–482
Geels FW, Schot J (2007) Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways. Res Policy 36(3):399–417
Genus A, Coles A-M (2008) Rethinking the multi-level perspective of technological transitions. Res Policy 37(9):1436–1445
Haanstra A-M, van der Pool E, van Weert A (2017) Eerste monitoring- & Evaluatierapportage Breng flex. HAN, Nijmegen
Jittrapirom P, Caiati V, Feneri A-M, Ebrahimigharehbaghi S, González MJA, Narayan J (2017a) Mobility as a Service: a critical review of definitions, assessments of schemes, and key challenges. Urban Plann 2(2):13
Jittrapirom P, Marchau VA, Meurs H (2017b) Dynamic adaptive policymaking for implementing Mobility as a Service (MAAS). Paper presented at the european transport conference, Barcelona
Kamargianni M, Matyas M (2017) The business ecosystem of Mobility-as-a-Service. In: 67th annual meeting of transportation research board. Transportation Research Board, Washington DC
Karlsson M, Sochor J, Strömberg H (2016) Developing the ‘Service’in Mobility as a Service: experiences from a field trial of an innovative travel brokerage. Transp Res Proc 14:3265–3273
Karlsson M, Sochor J, Aapaoja A, Eckhardt J (2017) Mobility-as-a-service: development of a tentative impact assessment framework. In: International conference on Mobility as a Service (ICOMaaS), 28–29 Nov. Tampere
Kerr L (2017) A tale of two green cities. Exploring the role of visions in the development of green infrastructure in two European Green Capital Cities. Radboud University
Martens K (2016) Transport justice: designing fair transportation systems. Routledge
Martin R, Sunley P (2006) Path dependence and regional economic evolution. J Econ Geogr 6(4):395–437
Marx R, de Mello AM, Zilbovicius M, de Lara FF (2015) Spatial contexts and firm strategies: applying the multilevel perspective to sustainable urban mobility transitions in Brazil. J Clean Prod 108:1092–1104
Meurs H, Timmermans H (2017) Mobility as a service as a multi-sided market: challenges for modeling. In: 96th annual meeting of transportation research board. Washington DC
Moradi A, Vagnoni E (2018) A multi-level perspective analysis of urban mobility system dynamics: what are the future transition pathways? Technol Forecast Soc Chang 126:231–243
Nykvist B, Whitmarsh L (2008) A multi-level analysis of sustainable mobility transitions: niche development in the UK and Sweden. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 75(9):1373–1387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2008.05.006
Oakil ATM, Manting D, Nijland H (2016) Determinants of car ownership among young households in the Netherlands: the role of urbanisation and demographic and economic characteristics. J Transp Geogr 51:229–235
Pereira RH, Schwanen T, Banister D (2017) Distributive justice and equity in transportation. Transp Rev 37(2):170–191
Rasouli S, Timmermans H (2013) Influence of social networks on latent choice of electric cars: a mixed logit specification using experimental design data. Netw Spat Econ 1–32
Sharmeen F (2015) Dynamics of social networks and activity travel behaviour. Eindhoven University of Technology
Sharmeen F, Lagendijk A (2017) Cycling practices through the lens of innovation biographies. Paper presented at the Asia Pacific Cycle Congress, Christchurch
Shove E, Walker G (2010) Governing transitions in the sustainability of everyday life. Res Policy 39(4):471–476
Tremblay VJ, Polasky S (2002) Advertising with subjective horizontal and vertical product differentiation. Rev Ind Organ 20(3):253–265
van Bree B, Verbong GPJ, Kramer GJ (2010) A multi-level perspective on the introduction of hydrogen and battery-electric vehicles. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 77(4):529–540. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2009.12.005
van der Veer D (2017) Public transport and mobility on-demand research on the efficiency of on-demand taxi service Abel. Radboud University
van Wee B (2015) Peak car: the first signs of a shift towards ICT-based activities replacing travel? A discussion paper. Transp Policy 42:1–3
Warnick B (2001) Critical literacy in a digital era: technology, rhetoric, and the public interest. Routledge
Wiig A (2015) IBM’s smart city as techno-utopian policy mobility. City 19(2–3):258–273
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sharmeen, F., Meurs, H. (2019). The Governance of Demand-Responsive Transit Systems—A Multi-level Perspective. In: Finger, M., Audouin, M. (eds) The Governance of Smart Transportation Systems. The Urban Book Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96526-0_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96526-0_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-96525-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-96526-0
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)