Skip to main content

The Governance of Demand-Responsive Transit Systems—A Multi-level Perspective

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Governance of Smart Transportation Systems

Part of the book series: The Urban Book Series ((UBS))

Abstract

In the new-generation smart mobility paradigm, Mobility-as-a-Service (MaaS) systems have shown the most potential to offer integrated mobility platforms. MaaS is essentially an amalgamation of services tailored to match individuals’ diverse travel demands, many of which are demand-responsive transit (DRT) or DRT-like, addressing the much-needed last-mile problem of transit systems. Managing a DRT system could be a simple first step in understanding the governance of MaaS, as the two types of system share the common features of flexibility and individualistic, online platform-based service provision. With that view, we deliberate this exploration here, reflecting on the governance of a DRT case study. We borrow from the schools of transition management and industrial economics to elaborate our understanding. Using the framework of the Multi-level Perspective (MLP), we investigate the drivers and barriers for the diffusion of DRT through the (transit) regime. The main drivers of DRTs are found to be the willingness of local governments and transit operators to implement DRT, whereas the main barriers stem from infrastructure, technology, and market practices. Alignment among the regime elements remains largely partial, which is consistent with our conceptualization of MaaS governance challenges. This research adds to the literature by offering a comprehensive foundation exercise to reflect on the governance of innovative mobility services.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The process is described in a short video in the Breng flex Web site (in Dutch) https://www.breng.nl/breng-flex/1411.

  2. 2.

    Detailed infographics of the survey can be accessed here (in Dutch) http://www.brengkenniscentrum.nl/blog/wat-vinden-reizigers-van-breng-flex/.

  3. 3.

    Abel was the first fully electrical fleet-operated shared taxi service based in Amsterdam, which was discontinued in 2017 (after operating for almost two-years) on account of market saturation of taxi services.

References

  • Ali A (2017) BrengFlex: how efficient is it from a user’s perspective? Radboud University

    Google Scholar 

  • Alonso-González MG, Liu T, Cats O, van Oort N, Hoogendoorn S (2018) The potential of demand responsive transport as a complement to public transport: an assessment framework and an empirical evaluation. In: 97th annual meeting of transportation research board. Washington D.C

    Google Scholar 

  • Amirgholy M, Gonzales EJ (2016) Demand responsive transit systems with time-dependent demand: user equilibrium, system optimum, and management strategy. Transp Res Part B: Methodol 92:234–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aturupane C, Djankov S, Hoekman B (1999) Horizontal and vertical intra-industry trade between Eastern Europe and the European Union. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 135(1):62–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauer HJ (1971) Case study of a demand-responsive transportation system. Highway Research Board, pp 171–124

    Google Scholar 

  • Conrad K (2005) Price competition and product differentiation when consumers care for the environment. Environ Resour Econ 31(1):1–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Docherty I, Marsden G, Anable J (2017) The governance of smart mobility. Transp Res Part A: Policy Pract

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebrahimi S, Sharmeen F, Meurs H (2018) Innovative business architectures (BAs) for Mobility as a Service (MaaS)-exploration, assessment, and categorization using operational MaaS Cases. In: 97th annual meeting of transportation research board. Washington D.C

    Google Scholar 

  • Fanti L (2013) Cross-ownership and unions in a Cournot duopoly: when profits reduce with horizontal product differentiation. Jpn World Econ 27:34–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gabszwicz JJ, Thisse J-F (1986) On the nature of competition with differentiated products. Econ J 160–172

    Google Scholar 

  • Geels FW (2002) Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case-study. Res Policy 31(8–9):1257–1274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geels FW (2004) From sectoral systems of innovation to socio-technical systems: Insights about dynamics and change from sociology and institutional theory. Res Policy 33(6–7):897–920

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geels FW (2011) The multi-level perspective on sustainability transitions: responses to seven criticisms. Environ Innov Societal Transitions 1(1):24–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geels FW (2012) A socio-technical analysis of low-carbon transitions: introducing the multi-level perspective into transport studies. J Transp Geogr 24:471–482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geels FW, Schot J (2007) Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways. Res Policy 36(3):399–417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Genus A, Coles A-M (2008) Rethinking the multi-level perspective of technological transitions. Res Policy 37(9):1436–1445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haanstra A-M, van der Pool E, van Weert A (2017) Eerste monitoring- & Evaluatierapportage Breng flex. HAN, Nijmegen

    Google Scholar 

  • Jittrapirom P, Caiati V, Feneri A-M, Ebrahimigharehbaghi S, González MJA, Narayan J (2017a) Mobility as a Service: a critical review of definitions, assessments of schemes, and key challenges. Urban Plann 2(2):13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jittrapirom P, Marchau VA, Meurs H (2017b) Dynamic adaptive policymaking for implementing Mobility as a Service (MAAS). Paper presented at the european transport conference, Barcelona

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamargianni M, Matyas M (2017) The business ecosystem of Mobility-as-a-Service. In: 67th annual meeting of transportation research board. Transportation Research Board, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Karlsson M, Sochor J, Strömberg H (2016) Developing the ‘Service’in Mobility as a Service: experiences from a field trial of an innovative travel brokerage. Transp Res Proc 14:3265–3273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karlsson M, Sochor J, Aapaoja A, Eckhardt J (2017) Mobility-as-a-service: development of a tentative impact assessment framework. In: International conference on Mobility as a Service (ICOMaaS), 28–29 Nov. Tampere

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerr L (2017) A tale of two green cities. Exploring the role of visions in the development of green infrastructure in two European Green Capital Cities. Radboud University

    Google Scholar 

  • Martens K (2016) Transport justice: designing fair transportation systems. Routledge

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin R, Sunley P (2006) Path dependence and regional economic evolution. J Econ Geogr 6(4):395–437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marx R, de Mello AM, Zilbovicius M, de Lara FF (2015) Spatial contexts and firm strategies: applying the multilevel perspective to sustainable urban mobility transitions in Brazil. J Clean Prod 108:1092–1104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meurs H, Timmermans H (2017) Mobility as a service as a multi-sided market: challenges for modeling. In: 96th annual meeting of transportation research board. Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Moradi A, Vagnoni E (2018) A multi-level perspective analysis of urban mobility system dynamics: what are the future transition pathways? Technol Forecast Soc Chang 126:231–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nykvist B, Whitmarsh L (2008) A multi-level analysis of sustainable mobility transitions: niche development in the UK and Sweden. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 75(9):1373–1387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2008.05.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oakil ATM, Manting D, Nijland H (2016) Determinants of car ownership among young households in the Netherlands: the role of urbanisation and demographic and economic characteristics. J Transp Geogr 51:229–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pereira RH, Schwanen T, Banister D (2017) Distributive justice and equity in transportation. Transp Rev 37(2):170–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rasouli S, Timmermans H (2013) Influence of social networks on latent choice of electric cars: a mixed logit specification using experimental design data. Netw Spat Econ 1–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharmeen F (2015) Dynamics of social networks and activity travel behaviour. Eindhoven University of Technology

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharmeen F, Lagendijk A (2017) Cycling practices through the lens of innovation biographies. Paper presented at the Asia Pacific Cycle Congress, Christchurch

    Google Scholar 

  • Shove E, Walker G (2010) Governing transitions in the sustainability of everyday life. Res Policy 39(4):471–476

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tremblay VJ, Polasky S (2002) Advertising with subjective horizontal and vertical product differentiation. Rev Ind Organ 20(3):253–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Bree B, Verbong GPJ, Kramer GJ (2010) A multi-level perspective on the introduction of hydrogen and battery-electric vehicles. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 77(4):529–540. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2009.12.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van der Veer D (2017) Public transport and mobility on-demand research on the efficiency of on-demand taxi service Abel. Radboud University

    Google Scholar 

  • van Wee B (2015) Peak car: the first signs of a shift towards ICT-based activities replacing travel? A discussion paper. Transp Policy 42:1–3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warnick B (2001) Critical literacy in a digital era: technology, rhetoric, and the public interest. Routledge

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiig A (2015) IBM’s smart city as techno-utopian policy mobility. City 19(2–3):258–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fariya Sharmeen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Sharmeen, F., Meurs, H. (2019). The Governance of Demand-Responsive Transit Systems—A Multi-level Perspective. In: Finger, M., Audouin, M. (eds) The Governance of Smart Transportation Systems. The Urban Book Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96526-0_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics