Abstract
Mutagenesis is the alteration of the genetic material by the help of mutagens. Mutations that are capable of inducing any diseases have a large impact on the biological systems. Whenever mutation occurs, it not only affects any particular gene or protein, but also affects the whole system related to that gene. Changes in one system will further bring out changes in the adjacent systems, which works in coordination with the mutated system. Thus, a single mutation can have an impact on more than one system. System network biology helps in providing a new perspective of inspection of these biological systems in the form of networks with the help of mathematical representations. In this chapter, we deal with different properties of the networks that help in analyzing the network-graph and finding the most probable network that best describes the process. Here we tried to investigate the candidate protein molecule that may act as a target protein with the help of network analysis. For this, we used various datasets and software that would be used in the reconstruction of different biological networks and pathways.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Barabási LS, Oltvai ZN (2004) Network biology: understanding the cell’s functional organization. Nat Rev Genet 5:101–113
Borgatti SP (2005) Centrality and network flow. Soc Netw 27:55–71
Borgattia SP, Everett MG (2006) A graph-theoretic perspective on centrality. Soc Netw 28(4):466–484
Bosley AD, Das S, Andresson T (2013) A role for protein–protein interaction networks in the identification and characterization of potential biomarkers (Chap. 21). In: Proteomic and metabolomic approaches to biomarker discovery, pp 333–347
Brandes U (2008) On variants of shortest-path betweenness centrality and their generic computation. Soc Netw 2:136–145
Buisson B, Bertrand D (2002) Nicotine addiction: the possible role of functional upregulation. Trends Pharmacol Sci 23(3):130–136
Bullmore DE, Sporns O (2009) Complex brain networks: graph theoretical analysis of structural and functional systems. Nat Rev Neurosci 10:186–198
Chang X, Xu T, Li Y, Wang K (2013) Dynamic modular architecture of protein-protein interaction networks beyond the dichotomy of ‘date’ and ‘party’ hubs. Sci Rep 3:1691
Dietz KJ, Jacquot JP, Harris G (2010) Hubs and bottlenecks in plant molecular signalling networks. New Phytol 188(4):919–936
Frank O (2010) Transitivity in stochastic graphs and digraphs. J Math Soc 7(2):199–213
Frenz CM (2005) Neural network-based prediction of mutation-induced protein stability changes in Staphylococcal nuclease at 20 residue positions. Proteins Struct Funct Bioinform 59(2):147–151
Gao W, Wu H, Siddiqui MK, Baig AQ (2017) Study of biological networks using graph theory 1–8 (in press). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2017.11.022
Gavin AC et al (2006) Proteome survey reveals modularity of the yeast cell machinery. Nature 440:631–636
Goel A, Wilkins MR (2012) Dynamic hubs show competitive and static hubs non-competitive regulation of their interaction partners. PLoS ONE 7(10):e48209
He X, Zhang J (2006) Why do hubs tend to be essential in protein networks? PLoS Genet 2(6):e88
Hecht SS (2003) Tobacco carcinogens, their biomarkers and tobacco-induced cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 3(10):733–744
Howard DJ, Briggs LA, Pritsos CA (1998) Oxidative DNA damage in mouse heart, liver, and lung tissue due to acute side-stream tobacco smoke exposure. Arch Biochem Biophys 352(2):293–297
Kalna G, Higham DJ (2007) A clustering coefficient for weighted networks, with application to gene expression data. AI Commun—Netw Anal Nat Sci Eng 20(4):263–271
Kang U, Papadimitriou S, Sun J, Tong H (2011) Centralities in large networks: algorithms and observations. In: Proceedings of the 2011 SIAM international conference on data mining, pp 119–130
Krot A, Prokhorenkova LO (2015) Local clustering coefficient in generalized preferential attachment models. In: Gleich DF, Komjathy J (eds) Algorithms and models for the web graph. Springer International Publishing Switzerland, pp 15–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26784-5_2
Lim E, Pon A, Djoumbou Y, Knox Craig, Shrivastava S, Guo AC, Neveu V, Wishart DS (2010) T3DB: a comprehensively annotated database of common toxins and their targets. Nucl Acids Res 38:D781–D786
Lu Z (2011) PubMed and beyond: a survey of web tools for searching biomedical literature. Database 2011(1):baq036
Lv YW, Jing Wang J, Sun L, Zhang JM, Cao L, Ding YY, Chen Y, Dou JJ, Huang J, Tang YF, Wu WT, Cui WR, Lv HT (2013) Understanding the pathogenesis of kawasaki disease by network and pathway analysis. Comput Math Methods Med 2013:1–17
Morlan J, Baker J, Sinicropi D (2009) Mutation detection by RT-PCR: a simple, robust and highly selective method. PLoS ONE 4(2):e4584
Opsahl T, Panzarasa P (2009) Clustering in weighted networks. Soc Netw 31(2):155–163
Pfeifer GP, Denissenko MF, Olivier M, Tretyakova N, Hecht SS, Hainaut P (2002) Tobacco smoke carcinogens, DNA damage and p53 mutations in smoking-associated cancers. Oncogene 21(48):7435–7451
Prokhorenkova LO, Samosvat E (2014) Global clustering coefficient in scale-free networks, pp 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13123-8_5
Pržulj N, Wigle DA, Jurisica I (2004) Functional topology in a network of protein interactions. Bioinformatics 20(3):340–348
Ran J, Li H, Fu J, Liu L, Xing Y, Li X, Shen H, Chen Y, Jiang X, Li Y, Li H (2013) Construction and analysis of the protein-protein interaction network related to essential hypertension. BMC Syst Biol 7:32
Shannon P, Markiel A, Ozier O, Baliga NS, Wang JT, Ramage D, Amin N, Schwikowski B, Ideker T (2003) Cytoscape: a software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Res 13(11):2498–2504
Spirin V, Mirny LA (2003) Protein complexes and functional modules in molecular networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100(21):12123–12128
Stam CJ, Reijneveld JC (2007) Graph theoretical analysis of complex networks in the brain. Nonlinear Biomed Phys 1(3):1–19
Szklarczyk D, Franceschini A, Wyder S, Forslund K, Heller D, Huerta-Cepas J, Simonovic M, Roth A, Santos A, Tsafou KP, Kuhn M, Bork P, Jensen LJ, von Mering C (2015) STRING v10: protein-protein interaction networks, integrated over the tree of life. Nucl Acids Res 43:D447–D452
Vallabhajosyula RR, Chakravarti D, Lutfeali S, Ray A, Raval A (2009) Identifying hubs in protein interaction networks. PLoS ONE 4(4):e5344
Vandereyken K, Leene JV, Coninck BD, Cammue BPA (2018) Hub protein controversy: taking a closer look at plant stress response hubs. Front Plant Sci 9:694
Villaverde AF, Ross J, Banga JR (2013) Reverse engineering cellular networks with information theoretic methods. Cells 2(2):306–329
Wishart D, Arndt D, Pon A, Sajed T, Guo AC, Djoumbou Y, Knox C, Wilson M, Liang Y, Liu JGY, Goldansaz SA, Rappaport SM (2015) T3DB: the toxic exposome database. Nucl Acids Res 43(D1):D928–D934
Wu Q (2013) The maximum clique problems with applications to graph coloring. Artificial Intelligence [cs.AI]. Université d’Angers. English
Yu H, Kim PM, Sprecher E, Trifonov V, Gerstein M (2007) The importance of bottlenecks in protein networks: correlation with gene essentiality and expression dynamics. PLoS Comput Biol 3(4):e59
Zhu CQ, Lam TH, Jiang CQ, Wei BX, Lou X, Liu WW, Lao XQ, Chen YH (1999) Lymphocyte DNA damage in cigarette factory workers measured by the Comet assay. Mutat Res/Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen 444(1):1–6
Zotenko E, Mestre J, O’Leary DP, Przytycka TM (2008) Why do hubs in the yeast protein interaction network tend to be essential: reexamining the connection between the network topology and essentiality. PLoS Comput Biol 4(8):e1000140
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Anukriti et al. (2019). System Network Biology Approaches in Exploring of Mechanism Behind Mutagenesis. In: Kesari, K. (eds) Networking of Mutagens in Environmental Toxicology. Environmental Science and Engineering(). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96511-6_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96511-6_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-96510-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-96511-6
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)