Advertisement

Exploring Movement and Direction in Aesthetics

Chapter
  • 615 Downloads

Abstract

Exploring movement and direction in both the human perception and experience of aesthetics and in the human process of creating beauty, this chapter artfully also expands the scope of inquiry by emphasizing the emotion of being moved. Recurring searches for universal beauty are explored as well as the arguments that such universal beauty exists.

References

  1. Adams, R. B., & Nelson, A. J. (2011). Intersecting identities and expressions: The compound nature of social perception. In J. Decety & J. T. Cacioppo (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of social neuroscience (pp. 394–403). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Alam, M. K., Mohd Noor, N. F., Basri, R., Yew, T. F., & Wen, T. H. (2015). Multiracial facial golden ratio and evaluation of facial appearance. PLoS One, 10(11), e0142914.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0142914.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Ambron, E., & Foroni, F. (2015). The attraction of emotions: Irrelevant emotional information modulates motor actions. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 22(4), 1117–1123.  https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-014-0779-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ardila, A. (2004). There is not any specific brain area for writing: From cave-paintings to computers. International Journal of Psychology, 39(1), 61–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ayala, F. J., & Cela-Conde, C. J. (2017). Which brain networks related to art perception are we talking about? “Move me, astonish me…” by Matthew Pelowski et al. Physics of Life Reviews, 21, 133–134.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plrev.2017.04.009.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Bauer-Wolf, J. (2017, July 24). Mattress protest and its aftermath. Inside Higher Ed. Retrieved from: https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2017/07/24/media-circus-surrounding-mattress-girl-case-changed-conversation-sexual-assault.
  7. Bejan, A. (2013). Constructal law: Pleasure, golden ratio, animal locomotion and the design: Comment on “the emergence of design in pedestrian dynamics: Locomotion, self-organization, walking paths and the constructal law” by A. Miguel. Physics of Life Reviews, 10, 199–201.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plrev.2013.04.010.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Benford, S., & Giannachi, G. (2011). Performing mixed reality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  9. Beuys, J. (1974). Art into society, society into art. London: Arts Council England.Google Scholar
  10. Bleeker, M., Sherman, J. F., & Nedelkopoulou, E. (Eds.). (2015). Performance and phenomenology: Traditions and transformations. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. Bouilloud, J.-P., & Deslandes, G. (2015). The aesthetics of leadership: Beau Geste as critical behaviour. Organization Studies, 36(8), 1095–1114.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840615585341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Boyd, B. (2009). On the origin of stories: Evolution, cognition, and fiction. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Brattico, E., Brattico, P., & Vuust, P. (2017). The forgotten artist: Why to consider intentions and interaction in a model of aesthetic experience comment on “move me, astonish me…” by Matthew Pelowski et al. Physics of Life Reviews, 21, 128–130.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plrev.2017.06.014.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Calvo-Merino, B., Urgesi, C., Orgs, G., Aglioti, S. M., & Haggard, P. (2010). Extrastriate body area underlies aesthetic evaluation of body stimuli. Experimental Brain Research, 204(3), 447–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cancienne, M. B., & Snowber, C. N. (2003). Writing rhythm: Movement as method. Qualitative Inquiry, 9(2), 237–253.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800402250956.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Carroll, N., & Seeley, W. P. (2013). Cognitivism, psychology, and neuroscience: Movies as attentional engines. In Psychocinematics: Exploring cognition at the movies (pp. 53–76). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Castellano, G., Mortillaro, M., Camurri, A., Volpe, G., & Scherer, K. (2008). Aautomated analysis of body movement in emotionally expressive piano performances. Music Perception, 26(2), 103–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Chatterjee, A. (2014). The aesthetic brain: How we evolved to desire beauty and enjoy art. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Chiang, W.-C., Lin, H.-H., Huang, C.-S., Lo, L.-J., & Wan, S.-Y. (2014). The cluster assessment of facial attractiveness using fuzzy neural network classifier based on 3D Moiré features. Pattern Recognition, 47, 1249–1260.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patcog.2013.09.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Clark, A. (2016). Surfing uncertainty: Prediction, action, and the embodied mind. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Cova, F., & Deonna, J. A. (2014). Being moved. Philosophical Studies, 169, 447–466.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-013-0192-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Cutting, J. E. (2002). Representing motion in a static image: Constraints and parallels in art, science, and popular culture. Perception, 31, 1165–1193.  https://doi.org/10.1068/p3318.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Designboom. (2018). Teamlab’s ocean vortices-inspired installation makes waves at the national gallery of victoria. Retrieved from: https://www.designboom.com/technology/teamlab-national-gallery-of-victoria-vortices-installation-12-27-2017/.
  24. Devlin, K. (2011). The golden ratio & the Fibonacci numbers: Fact versus fiction. In Math encounters—Fibonacci & the golden ratio exposed—Keith Devlin (Presentation & Workshop). Stanford, CA: National Museum of Mathematics.Google Scholar
  25. Dewey, J. (1934). Art as experience. New York, NY: The Berkley Publishing Group.Google Scholar
  26. Dia Center for the Arts. (1997). Komar & Melamid: The most wanted paintings. Retrieved from: http://awp.diaart.org/km/index.html.
  27. Dick, K., & Ziering, A. (2017, October 12). Filmmakers of sexual assault doc call on academy to oust Harvey Weinstein. The Hollywood Reporter. Retrieved from: https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/race/filmmakers-sexual-assault-doc-call-academy-oust-harvey-weinstein-guest-column-1048412.
  28. Doc Impact Award. (2018). Doc Impact Award. Retrieved from: http://www.docimpactaward.org/.
  29. Dutton, D. (2009). The art instinct: Beauty, pleasure, and human evolution. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Eisner, E. (2008). Art and knowledge. In J. G. Knowles & A. L. Cole (Eds.), Handbook of the arts in qualitative research: Perspectives, methodologies, examples, and issues (pp. 3–13). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Emerson, R. W. (1836). Nature. Boston, MA: James Munroe and Company.Google Scholar
  32. Exploratorium. (2016). Strandbeest: The dream machines of Theo Jansen. Retrieved from: https://www.exploratorium.edu/strandbeest.
  33. Face Research Lab. (2018). Face Research Lab. Retrieved from: http://facelab.org/.
  34. Fellows, S. (2015, October 5). Stephen Fellows: Film data and education. Retrieved from: https://stephenfollows.com/how-many-films-are-made-around-the-world/.
  35. Foo, Y. Z., Simmons, L. W., & Rhodes, G. (2017). Predictors of facial attractiveness and health in humans. Scientific Reports, 7, 39731.  https://doi.org/10.1038/srep39731.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  36. Friedrich, T. E., & Elias, L. J. (2016). The write bias: The influence of native writing direction on aesthetic preference biases. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 10(2), 128–133.  https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000055.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Fürst, G., Ghisletta, P., & Lubart, T. (2017). An experimental study of the creative process in writing. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 11(2), 202–215.  https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Girod, M., Rau, C., & Schepige, A. (2003). Appreciating the beauty of science ideas: Teaching for aesthetic understanding. Science Education, 87(4), 574–587.  https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.1054.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of everyday self. New York, NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  40. Graham, D., Pallett, P. M., Ming, M., & Leder, H. (2014). Representation and aesthetics of the human face in portraiture. Art & Perception, 2, 75–98.  https://doi.org/10.1163/22134913-00002026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Home-Cook, G. (2015). Theatre and aural attention: Stretching ourselves. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Hughes, S. M., & Aung, T. (2018). Symmetry in motion: Perception of attractiveness changes with facial movement. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 1–17.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10919-018-0277-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Jacobsen, T. (2017). Aesthetic episodes, domains, and the mind comment on: “Move me…” by Matthew Pelowski et al. Physics of Life Reviews, 21, 143–144.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plrev.2017.02.003.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Jansen, T., & Sheil, B. (2008). Strandbeests. Architectual Digest, 78(4), 22–27.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ad.701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Joshi, D., Datta, R., Fedorovskaya, E., Luong, Q.-T., Wang, J. Z., Li, J., & Luo, J. (2011, September). Aesthetics and emotion in images. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 28(5), 94–115.  https://doi.org/10.1109/msp.2011.941851.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Jowett, G. S., & O’Donnell, V. (2015). Propaganda & persuasion (6th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  47. Kaufman, J. C. (Ed.). (2014). Creativity and mental illness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Kim, Y. E., Schmidt, E. M., Migneco, R., Morton, B. G., Richardson, P., Scott, J., … Turnbull, D. (2010). Music emotion recognition: A state of the art review. 11th International Society for Music Information Retrieval Conference (ISMIR) (pp. 255–266).Google Scholar
  49. Komter, A. E. (2004). Gratitude and gift exchange. In R. A. Emmons & M. E. McCullough (Eds.), Psychology of gratitude (pp. 195–255). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Langlois, J. H., Kalakanis, L., Rubenstein, A. J., Larson, A., Hallman, M., & Smoot, M. (2000). Maxims or myths? A meta-analytic and theoretical review. Psychological Review, 126(3), 390–423.  https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-2909.126.3.390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Laurentini, A., & Bottino, A. (2014). Computer analysis of face beauty: A survey. Computer Vision and Image Understanding, 125, 184–199.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cviu.2014.04.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Liu, S., Erikkinen, M. G., Healey, M. L., Xu, Y., Swett, K. E., Chow, H. M., & Braun, A. R. (2015). Brain activity and connectivity during poetry composition: Toward a multidimensional model of the creative process. Human Brain Mapping, 36, 3351–3372.  https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.22849.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Liu, S., Fan, Y.-Y., Guo, Z., Samal, A., & Ali, A. (2017). A landmark-based data-driven approach on 2.5D facial attractiveness computation. Neurocomputing, 238, 168–178.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2017.01.050.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Livio, M. (2002a). The golden ratio and aesthetics. Plus Magazine. Retrieved from: https://plus.maths.org/content/golden-ratio-and-aesthetics.
  55. Livio, M. (2002b). The golden ratio: The story of Phi the extraordinary number of nature art and beauty. London, UK: Headline Review.Google Scholar
  56. Lubart, T. I. (2000). Models of the creative process: Past, present and future. Creativity Research Journal, 13(3–4), 295–308.  https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326934CRJ1334_07.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Lumet, S. (1996). Making movies. New York, NY: First Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  58. Minahan, S., & Cox, J. W. (Eds.). (2018). The aesthetic turn in management. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  59. Moving Art, LLC. (2016). Gratitude revealed. Retrieved from: https://gratituderevealed.com/.
  60. Nadal, M., & Skov, M. (2017). Top-down and bottom-up: Front to back comment on “move me, astonish me…” by Matthew Pelowski et al. Physics of Life Reviews, 21, 148–149.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plrev.2017.06.013.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Nichols, B. (2017). Introduction to documentary (3rd ed.). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Nusbaum, E. C., Beaty, R. E., & Silvia, P. J. (2014). Ruminating about mental illness and creativity. In J. C. Kaufman (Ed.), Creativity and mential illness (pp. 395–402). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Okumura, Y., Kanakogi, Y., Kanda, T., Ishiguro, H., & Itakura, S. (2013). The power of human gaze on infant learning. Cognition, 128, 127–133.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2013.03.011.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Pacioli, L. (1509). De Divina Proportione. Venice, IT: Paganini.Google Scholar
  65. Palacios-Sánchez, L., Botero-Meneses, J. S., Pachón, R. P., Hernández, L. B., Triana- Melo, J. D., & Ramírez-Rodríguez, S. (2018). Stendhal syndrome: A clinical and historical overview. Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria, 76(2), 120–123.  https://doi.org/10.1590/0004-282X20170189.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Pallett, P. M., Link, S., & Lee, K. (2009). New “golden” ratios for facial beauty. Vision Research, 50, 149–154.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2009.11.003.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  67. Pelowski, M., Markey, P., Forster, M., Gerger, G., & Leder, H. (2017). Move me, astonish me…delight my eyes and brain: The Vienna Integrated Model of top-down and bottom-up processes in Art Perception (VIMAP) and corresponding affective, evaluative, and neurophysiological correlates. Physics of Life Reviews, 21, 80–125.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plrev.2017.02.003.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Perrett, D. (2012). In your face: The new science of human attraction. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  69. Puente, M., & Kelly, C. (2018, February 20). How common is sexual misconduct in Hollywood? USA Today. Retrieved from: https://www.usatoday.com/story/life/people/2018/02/20/usa-today-sunshine-project-methodology-explained/310757002/.
  70. Reason, M., Kay, R., Kauppi, J.-P., Tohka, J., Jussi, C., Reynolds, D., … Pollick, F. (2016). Spectators’ aesthetic experience of sound and movement in dance performance: A transdisciplinary investigation. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 10(1), 42–55.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0040032.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Reijnders, S. (2016). Stories that move: Fiction, imagination, tourism. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 19(6), 672–689.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549415597922.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Rota, G.-C. (1997). The phenomenology of mathematical beauty. Synthese, 111(2), 171–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Schubert, T. W., Zickfeld, J. H., Seibt, B., & Fiske, A. P. (2018). Moment-to-moment changes in feeling moved match changes in closeness, tears, goosebumps, and warmth: Time series analyses. Cognition and Emotion, 32(1), 174–184.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2016.1268998.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. Sheehan, M. J., & Nachman, M. W. (2014). Morphological and population genomic evidence that human faces have evolved to signal individual identity. Nature Commuinications, 5(4800), 1–10.  https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms5800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Shimamura, A. P. (Ed.). (2013). Psychocinematics: Exploring cognition at the movies. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  76. Simonton, D. K. (2002). Collaborative aesthetics in the feature film: Cinematic components predicting the differential impact of 2,323 Oscar-nominated movies. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 20(2), 115–125.  https://doi.org/10.2190/RHQ2-9UC3-6T32-HR66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Skov, M., & Vartanian, O. (Eds.). (2018). Neuroaesthetics: Foundations and frontiers in aesthetics. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  78. Spry, T. (2011). Body, paper, stage: Writing and performing autoethnography. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.Google Scholar
  79. Starr, G. G. (2013). Feeling beauty: The neuroscience of aesthetic experience. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Tan, Y., Tang, P., Zhou, Y., Luo, W., Kang, Y., & Li, G. (2017). Photograph aesthetical evaluation and classification with deep convolutional neural networks. Neurocomputing, 228, 165–175.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2016.08.098.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. teamLab. (2017). Moving creates vortices and vortices create movement. National Gallery of Victoria, Melbourne, Australia.Google Scholar
  82. The University of Texas at Austin. (2018). Langlois Social Development Lab. The University of Texas at Austin, College of Liberal Arts, Department of Psychology. Retrieved from: https://labs.la.utexas.edu/langloislab/.
  83. Ureña, L. (2018, March 13). Celebrating 50 years: Sonic Blossom. National Portraint Gallery. Retrieved from: http://npg.si.edu/blog/celebrating-50-years-sonic-blossom.
  84. Vazeou-Nieuwenhuis, A., Orehek, E., & Scheier, M. F. (2017). The meaning of action: Do self-regulatory processes contribute to a purposeful life? Personality and Individual Differences, 116, 115–122.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.04.040.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Vessel, E. A., Starr, G. G., & Rubin, N. (2013). Art reaches within: Aesthetic experience, the self and the default mode network. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 7, 258.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2013.00258..CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  86. Wachtel, E. (1993). The first picture show: Cinematic aspects of cave art. Leonardo, 26(2), 135–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Wypijewski, J. (Ed.). (1999). Painting by numbers: Komar amd Melamid’s scientific guide to art. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  88. Zaidel, D. W. (2016). Neuropsychology of art: Neurological, cognitive, and evolutionary persectives (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Arizona State UniversityTempeUSA
  2. 2.Arizona State UniversityPhoenixUSA

Personalised recommendations