Advertisement

Why Critical Theory Is Important

Chapter
  • 777 Downloads

Abstract

This chapter provides a summarized foundation of critical theory organized around leadership as commonly conceptualized that challenges the myths of neutrality and scientific objectivity that encumber fields of study. A critical approach to leadership studies highlights that mere descriptive analysis is not only inadequate, it also reinforces oppressive social relations.

References

  1. Adorno, T. W. (1997). Negative dialectics. New York, NY: Continuum International Publishing.Google Scholar
  2. Antonio, R. J. (1981). Immanent critique as the core of critical theory: Its origins and developments in Hegel, Marx and contemporary thought. The British Journal of Sociology, 32(3), 330–345.  https://doi.org/10.2307/589281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arato, A., & Gebhardt, E. (Eds.). (1982). Essential Frankfurt School reader. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
  4. Aristotle. (1999a). Nicomachean ethics (T. Irwin, Trans.) (2nd ed.). Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  5. Aristotle. (1999b). The metaphysics (H. Lawson-Tancred, Trans.) (New ed.). London  and New York: Penguin Classics.Google Scholar
  6. Augustine. (1994). Augustine: Political writings (E. L. Fortin & D. Kries, Trans.). Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company, Inc.Google Scholar
  7. Ayer. (1959). Logical positivism. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.Google Scholar
  8. Azmanova, A. (2012). Social justice and varieties of capitalism: An immanent critique. New Political Economy, 17(4), 445–463.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2011.606902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ballantine, J. H., Hammack, F. M., & Stuber, J. (2017). The sociology of education: A systemic analysis (8th ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bottomore, T. (2002). The high tide of critical theory. In The Frankfurt School & its critics (pp. 27–54). London and New York: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  11. Bourdieu, P. (1992). The logic of practice (1st ed.). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Bourdieu, P. (1994). The field of cultural production: Essays on art and literature (New ed.). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Brown, W. (2005). Edgework: Critical essays on knowledge and politics. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Carrabregu, G. (2016). Habermas on solidarity: An immanent critique: Habermas on solidarity: Gent Carrabregu. Constellations, 23(4), 507–522.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8675.12257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chandler, J. L. S., & Kirsch, R. E. (2018). Addressing race and culture within a critical leadership approach. In J. L. Chin, J. E. Trimble, & J. E. Garcia (Eds.), Global and culturally diverse leaders and leadership: New dimensions and challenges for business, education and society. Bingley: Emerald.Google Scholar
  16. Chase, M. (2011). Teleology and final causation in Aristotle and in contemporary science. Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review/Revue Canadienne de Philosophie, 50(3), 511–536.  https://doi.org/10.1017/s0012217311000527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Curtis, R. (2014). Foucault beyond Fairclough: From transcendental to immanent critique in organization studies. Organization Studies, 35(12), 1753–1772.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840614546150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Curzer, C. (1996). A defense of Aristotle’s doctrine that virtue is a mean. Ancient Philosophy, 16(1), 129–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Deleuze, G. (1988). Foucault. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  20. DiSalle, R. (2002). Reconsidering Kant, Friedman, logical positivism, and the exact sciences. Philosophy of Science, 69(2), 191–211.  https://doi.org/10.1086/341049.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Doddington, C. (2007). Critical thinking as a source of respect for persons: A critique. Educational Philosophy & Theory, 39(4), 449–459.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-5812.2007.00350.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Elias, N. (2000). The civilizing process (2nd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
  23. Farr, A. L. (2009). Critical theory and democratic vision: Herbert Marcuse and recent liberation philosophies. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  24. Foucault, M. (1982). Archeology of knowledge. London and New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
  25. Foucault, M. (2005). The hermeneutics of the subject: Lectures at the college de France 1981–1982. New York: Picador.Google Scholar
  26. Gabel, J. (1978). False consciousness: An essay on reification (1st Torchbooks Ed. Publ. 1978 edition). New York, NY: Harper Torchbooks.Google Scholar
  27. Galloway, A. R. (2006). Protocol: How control exists after decentralization (New ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  28. Giddens, A. (1975). Positivism and sociology. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
  29. Groarke, L. (2015). Aristotle’s contrary psychology: The mean in ethics and beyond. Review of Metaphysics, 69(1), 25.Google Scholar
  30. Habermas, J. (1998). Legitimation crisis. Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  31. Habermas, J. (2000). On the pragmatics of communication (M. Cooke, Ed.) (1st ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  32. Harrison, C. (2018). Leadership theory and research: A critical approach to new and existing paradigms. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hobbes, T. (1994). Leviathan (E. M. Curley, Ed.). Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  34. Holmes, N. G., Wieman, C. E., & Bonn, D. A. (2015). Teaching critical thinking. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(36), 11199–11204.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1505329112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Horkheimer, M. (1975). Critical theory: Selected essays (M. J. O’Connell, Trans.) (1st ed.). New York: Continuum Publishing Corporation.Google Scholar
  36. Jay, M. (1977). The concept of totality in Lukacs and Adorno. Telos, 1977(32), 117–137.  https://doi.org/10.3817/0677032117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Jay, M. (1996). The dialectical imagination: A history of the Frankfurt School and the institute of social research, 1923–1950. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  38. Kellner, D. (1984). Herbert Marcuse and the crisis of Marxism. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kirsch, R. (2016). The “digital revolution” reconsidered. New Political Science, 38(1), 100–115.  https://doi.org/10.1080/07393148.2015.1125635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kosik, K. (1969). The concrete totality. Telos, 1969(4), 35–54.  https://doi.org/10.3817/0969004035.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd ed.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  42. Locke, J. (1980). Second treatise of government (C. B. Macpherson, Ed.). Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
  43. Lukács, G. (1972). History and class consciousness: Studies in Marxist dialectics (R. Livingstone, Trans.) (MIT Press edition). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  44. Luke, T. W. (1990a). Screens of power: Ideology, domination, and resistance in informational society (Reissue). Urbana and Chigago: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  45. Luke, T. W. (1990b). Social theory and modernity: Critique, dissent, and revolution. Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
  46. Luke, T. W. (1997). Ecocritique: Contesting the politics of nature, economy, and culture (1st ed.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  47. Macdonald, B. J. (2017). Traditional and critical theory today: Toward a critical political science. New Political Science, 39(4), 511–522.  https://doi.org/10.1080/07393148.2017.1378857.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. MacKenzie, D. (2008). An engine, not a camera: How financial models shape markets. Boston: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  49. Marcuse, H. (1968). One-dimensional man (6th ed.). Boston, MA: Beacon.Google Scholar
  50. Marcuse, H. (1969). Negations: Essays in critical theory. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  51. Marcuse, H. (1971). The concept of negation in the dialectic. Telos, 1971(8), 130–132.  https://doi.org/10.3817/0671008130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Marcuse, H. (1999). Reason and revolution (100th Anniversary Ed.). Amherst, NY: Humanity Books.Google Scholar
  53. Mason, M. (2007). Critical thinking and learning. Educational Philosophy & Theory, 39(4), 339–349.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-5812.2007.00343.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Morrow, R. A., & Brown, D. D. (1994). Critical theory and methodology (1st ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  55. Mulnix, J. W. (2012). Thinking critically about critical thinking. Educational Philosophy & Theory, 44(5), 464–479.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-5812.2010.00673.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Natale, S., & Ricci, F. (2006). Critical thinking in organizations. Team Performance Management: An International Journal, 12(7/8), 272–277.  https://doi.org/10.1108/13527590610711822.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Papastephanou, M., & Angeli, C. (2007). Critical thinking beyond skill. Educational Philosophy & Theory, 39(6), 604–621.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-5812.2007.00311.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Piccone, P. (1968). Towards a socio-historical interpretation of the scientific revolution. Telos, 1968(1), 16–26.  https://doi.org/10.3817/0368001016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Popper, K. (2002). The logic of scientific discovery (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  60. Rose, N. (2006). The politics of life itself: Biomedicine, power, and subjectivity in the twenty-first century. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  61. Rovatti, P. A. (1968). Marcuse and the crisis of the European sciences. Telos, 1968(2), 113–115.  https://doi.org/10.3817/0968002113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Ruja, H. (1936). The logic of logical positivism. The Journal of Philosophy, 33(15), 393–408.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2015867.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Sabia, D. (2010). Defending immanent critique. Political Theory, 38(5), 684–711.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0090591710372864.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Särkelä, A. (2017). Immanent critique as self-transformative practice: Hegel, Dewey, and contemporary critical theory. The Journal of Speculative Philosophy, 31(2), 218–230.  https://doi.org/10.5325/jspecphil.31.2.0218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Schlembach, R. (2015). Negation, refusal and co-optation: The Frankfurt School and social movement theory. Sociology Compass, 9(11), 987–999.  https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Surin, K. (2006). The Frankfurt School, the marxist tradition, culture and critical thinking: Max Horkheimer (1895–1973), Herbert Marcuse (1898–1979), Theodor Adorno (1903–1969), Jurgen Habermas (1929–). In J. Wolfreys (Ed.), Modern European criticism and theory: A critical guide. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
  67. Waltershausen, W. S. V. (2018). Gauss: A memorial. Sacramento, CA: Sagwan Press.Google Scholar
  68. Wolin, S. (2004). Politics and vision: Continuity and innovation in western political thought (Expanded ed.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  69. Wolin, S. (2016). Fugitive Democracy: And Other Essays (N. Xenos, Ed.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  70. Wrenn, M. V. (2016). Immanent critique, enabling myths, and the neoliberal narrative. Review of Radical Political Economics, 48(3), 452–466.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0486613415605074.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Yanchar, S. C., Slife, B. D., & Warne, R. (2008). Critical thinking as disciplinary practice. Review of General Psychology, 12(3), 265–281.  https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.12.3.265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Arizona State UniversityTempeUSA
  2. 2.Arizona State UniversityPhoenixUSA

Personalised recommendations