Abstract
In the setting of discriminant analysis it is assumed that the so-called training data belong to certain groups. The goal is to find classification rules that allow to assign new test data to one of the groups. Different discriminant methods have been introduced, such as linear discriminant analysis (LDA), with Fisher’s method as a specific approach, and quadratic discriminant analysis (QDA). Both LDA and QDA utilize the information on prior class probabilities and heavily use the assumption of normality in ilr coordinates (normal distribution on the simplex) to represent group distributions. While for QDA individual group covariance matrices are assumed, a joint covariance matrix is computed for the case of LDA. These methods result in classification rules that allow to assign a new test set observation to one of the groups by taking the prior information on class pertinence into account. The Fisher discriminant rule aims for the same goal, but now no underlying distributions of the samples in the groups are assumed and the idea is to search for projection directions which allow for a maximum separation of the group means with respect to the spread of the projected data. As a consequence, also discriminant scores can be derived that are used to visualize relevant information for the group separation. All described procedures are invariant with respect to the choice of the orthonormal coordinates, and this also holds for the robust counterparts of the covariance-based methods if an affine equivariant location and covariance estimator (like the MCD estimator) is taken.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
P. Filzmoser, K. Joossens, C. Croux, Multiple group linear discriminant analysis: robustness and error rate, in COMPSTAT 2006 - Proceedings in Computational Statistics, ed. by A. Rizzi, M. Vichi (Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg, 2006), pp. 521–532
P. Filzmoser, K. Hron, M. Templ, Discriminant analysis for compositional data and robust parameter estimation. J. Comput. Stat. 27(4), 585–604 (2012)
R.A. Fisher, The use of multiple measurements in taxonomic problems. Ann. Eugenics 7(Part II), 179–188 (1936)
T. Hastie, R. Tibshirani, J. Friedman, The Elements of Statistical Learning, 2nd edn. (Springer, New York, 2009)
R.A. Johnson, D.W. Wichern, Applied Multivariate Statistical Analysis, 6th edn. (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, 2007)
C.R. Rao, The utilization to multiple measurements in problems of biological classification. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B 10, 159–203 (1948)
P. Rousseeuw, Multivariate estimation with high breakdown point, in Mathematical Statistics and Applications, ed. by W. Grossmann, G. Pflug, I. Vincze, W. Wertz (Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, 1985), pp. 283–297
P.J. Rousseeuw, K. Van Driessen, A fast algorithm for the minimum covariance determinant estimator. Technometrics 41(3), 212–223 (1999)
V. Todorov, P. Filzmoser, An object-oriented framework for robust multivariate analysis. J. Stat. Softw. 32(1), 1–47 (2009)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Filzmoser, P., Hron, K., Templ, M. (2018). Discriminant Analysis. In: Applied Compositional Data Analysis. Springer Series in Statistics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96422-5_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96422-5_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-96420-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-96422-5
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)