Advertisement

Software Citation in Theory and Practice

  • Daniel S. KatzEmail author
  • Neil P. Chue Hong
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10931)

Abstract

In most fields, computational models and data analysis have become a significant part of how research is performed, in addition to the more traditional theory and experiment. Mathematics is no exception to this trend. While the system of publication and credit for theory and experiment (journals and books, often monographs) has developed and has become an expected part of the culture, how research is shared and how candidates for hiring, promotion are evaluated, software (and data) do not have the same history. A group working as part of the FORCE11 community developed a set of principles for software citation that fit software into the journal citation system, allow software to be published and then cited, and there are now over 50,000 DOIs that have been issued for software. However, some challenges remain, including: promoting the idea of software citation to developers and users; collaborating with publishers to ensure that systems collect and retain required metadata; ensuring that the rest of the scholarly infrastructure, particularly indexing sites, include software; working with communities so that software efforts “count”; and understanding how best to cite software that has not been published.

Keywords

Software citation Credit Software identifiers Software metadata Software repositories Bibliometrics 

References

  1. 1.
    Citeas. http://citeas.org/. Accessed 27 Apr 2018
  2. 2.
    American Astronomical Society: Citing repositories in AAS journals (AJ/ApJ) (2018). https://github.com/AASJournals/Tutorials/blob/master/Repositories/CitingRepositories.md. Accessed 27 Apr 2018
  3. 3.
    Caltech Library: Enhanced software preservation now available in CaltechDATA! (2018). https://www.library.caltech.edu/news/enhanced-software-preservation-now-available-caltechdata. Accessed 27 Apr 2018
  4. 4.
    Croucher, M.: How to cite MATLAB in research papers (2013). http://www.walkingrandomly.com/?p=4767. Accessed 27 Apr 2018
  5. 5.
    Data Citation Synthesis Group: Joint declaration of data citation principles. In: Martone, M. (ed.) FORCE 2011, San Diego, CA (2014).  https://doi.org/10.25490/a97f-egyk
  6. 6.
    Di Cosmo, R., Zacchiroli, S.: Software heritage: why and how to preserve software source code. In: iPRES 2017: 14th International Conference on Digital Preservation, Kyoto, Japan (2017). https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01590958 hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01590958/file/ipres-2017-software-heritage.pdf
  7. 7.
  8. 8.
    GitHub: Making your code citable (2018). https://guides.github.com/activities/citable-code/. Accessed 27 Apr 2018
  9. 9.
    Hettrick, S.: It’s impossible to conduct research without software, say 7 out of 10 UK researchers (2014). http://bit.ly/2B8y6Iz
  10. 10.
    Hettrick, S., Antonioletti, M., Carr, L., Chue Hong, N., Crouch, S., De Roure, D., Emsley, I., Goble, C., Hay, A., Inupakutika, D., Jackson, M., Nenadic, A., Parkinson, T., Parsons, M.I., Pawlik, A., Peru, G., Proeme, A., Robinson, J., Sufi, S.: UK research software survey 2014, December 2014.  https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14809
  11. 11.
    Howison, J., Bullard, J.: Software in the scientific literature: problems with seeing, finding, and using software mentioned in the biology literature. J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 67(9), 2137–2155 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23538CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jones, M.B., Boettiger, C., Mayes, A.C., Smith, A., Slaughter, P., Niemeyer, K., Gil, Y., Fenner, M., Nowak, K., Hahnel, M., Coy, L., Allen, A., Crosas, M., Sands, A., Chue Hong, N., Cruse, P., Katz, D.S., Goble, C.: CodeMeta: an exchange schema for software metadata. Version 2.0. (2017).  https://doi.org/10.5063/schema/codemeta-2.0
  13. 13.
    Journal of Statistical Software: Journal of statistical software style guide. https://www.jstatsoft.org/pages/view/style. Accessed 27 Apr 2018
  14. 14.
    Nangia, U., Katz, D.S.: Survey of National Postdoctoral Association - dataset, August 2017.  https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.843607
  15. 15.
    Nangia, U., Katz, D.S.: Track 1 paper: Surveying the U.S. National Postdoctoral Association Regarding Software use and Training in Research. Figshare (2017).  https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.5328442.v3
  16. 16.
    Nangia, U., Katz, D.S.: Understanding software in research: initial results from examining nature and a call for collaboration. In: Proceedings of the 13th IEEE International Conference on eScience (eScience 2017) (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1109/eScience.2017.78
  17. 17.
    SAS Institute Inc.: Referencing data analysis performed with SAS\(^{\textregistered }\) software (2015). https://www.sas.com/en_us/legal/editorial-guidelines.html. Accessed 27 Apr 2018
  18. 18.
    Science & Technology Facilities Council: HSL a collection of Fortran codes for large scale scientific computation. http://www.hsl.rl.ac.uk/catalogue/. Accessed 27 Apr 2018
  19. 19.
    Smith, A.M., Katz, D.S., Niemeyer, K.E., FORCE11 Software Citation Working Group: Software citation principles. PeerJ Comput. Sci. 2, e86 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Smith, A.M., Katz, D.S., Niemeyer, K.E., FORCE11 Software Citation Working Group: Software citation principles. PeerJ Prepr. 4, e2169v1 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.2169v1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    swMath: swMATH: an information service for mathematical software. http://www.swmath.org. Accessed 30 Apr 2018
  22. 22.
    Taylor & Francis: Taylor & Francis standard reference style—NLM. https://www.tandf.co.uk//journals/authors/style/reference/tf_NLM.pdf. Accessed 27 Apr 2018
  23. 23.
    The GAP Group: How to cite GAP (2018). https://www.gap-system.org/Contacts/cite.html. Accessed 27 Apr 2018

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Illinois Urbana-ChampaignUrbanaUSA
  2. 2.University of EdinburghEdinburghUK

Personalised recommendations