Advertisement

Animals, Language and Ethics

  • Philip J. SampsonEmail author
Chapter
  • 159 Downloads
Part of the The Palgrave Macmillan Animal Ethics Series book series (PMAES)

Abstract

Changes in the way we talk about animals can narrow or expand ethical debates about them. During the twentieth century, a consensus narrative emerged that a more humanitarian way of talking about animals had to await the demise of Christian ‘dominion thought’, the idea that God gave humans mastery over animals, to use as we please. The claim is that a more modest and humane view of humanity’s place in the universe could only emerge with the collapse of the Christian vision. This chapter explores this narrative, introduces motifs which will subsequently recur and suggests that the growth of more compassionate attitudes towards animals in modernity is more complex than the consensus narrative suggests.

Bibliography

  1. Baker, John Austin. 1992. “Foreword”. In The Duty of Mercy, by Humphrey Primatt, 9. Fontwell, Sussex: Centaur Press.Google Scholar
  2. Bono, James. 2001. “Why Metaphor?” In Science Studies: Probing the Dynamics of Scientific Knowledge, edited by Sabine Maasen and Matthias Winterhager, 215–234. Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag.Google Scholar
  3. Bradley, Ian. 1990. God is Green. London: Darton, Longman and Todd.Google Scholar
  4. Butler, Judith. 1997. Excitable Speech: A Politics of the Performative. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Cartmill, Matt. 1993. A View to a Death in the Morning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Cohen, Jeremy. 1989. Be Fertile and Increase, Fill the Earth and Master It. New York: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Cottingham, John. 1993. A Descartes Dictionary. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  8. Cronon, William. 1996. Uncommon Ground: Rethinking the Human Place in Nature. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
  9. Crowther, Kathleen M. 2010. Adam and Eve in the Protestant Reformation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Franklin, Adrian. 1999. Animals and Modern Culture: A Sociology of Human-Animal Relations in Modernity. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  11. Gruber, Howard E. 1974. Darwin on Man. London: Wildwood House.Google Scholar
  12. Gullone, Eleonora. 2017. “Why Eating Animals Is Not Good for Us.” Journal of Animal Ethics 7 (1) (Spring): 31–62.Google Scholar
  13. Hansard. 1879. Cruelty to Animals Bill. HL Deb. 15 July 1879: Series 3, vol. 248, cc419–36. London: Hansard.Google Scholar
  14. Harrison, Ruth. 1964. Animal Machines. London: Vincent Stuart.Google Scholar
  15. Harwood, Dix. 1928. Love for Animals and How It Developed in Great Britain. New York: Colombia University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Hasan, Ruqaiya. 2009. “Semantic Variation.” In The Collected Works of Ruqaiya Hasan, vol. 2, 41–72. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
  17. Hinde, John R. 2000. Jacob Burckhardt and the Crisis of Modernity, 10–11. Montreal: McGill-Queens University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Hodges, Thomas. 1675. The Creatures Goodness as They Came Out of Gods Hands, and the Good Mans Mercy to the Brute Creatures, Which God Hath Put Under His Feet. London: Tho. Parkhurst.Google Scholar
  19. Horkheimer, Max, and Theodor W. Adorno. 2002. Dialectic of Enlightenment. Translated by Edmund Jephcott. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Johnson, Lisa. 2017. “On the Suffering of Animals in Nature.” Journal Animal Ethics 7 (1) (Spring): 63–77.Google Scholar
  21. Leiss, W. 1974. The Domination of Nature. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  22. LeVasseur, Todd, and Anna Peterson, eds. 2017. Religion and Ecological Crisis: The “Lynn White Thesis” at Fifty. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  23. Linzey, Andrew. 1994. Animal Theology. London: SCM.Google Scholar
  24. Lyotard, Jean-François. 1989. The Postmodern Condition. Translated by Geoff Bennington and Brian Massumi. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Maasen, Sabine, and Peter Weingart. 2013. Metaphors and the Dynamics of Knowledge. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  26. McHarg, Ian. 1969. Design with Nature. New York: Natural History Press.Google Scholar
  27. Northcott, Michael S. 1996. The Environment and Christian Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Oddie, Bill. 2013. “Welby Too Busy to Be RSPCA Patron? But They Don’t Do Anything, Says Vice-President Bill Oddie.” John Bingham in The Telegraph, August 18. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/earth/environment/10250923/Welby-too-busy-to-be-RSPCA-patron-But-they-dont-do-anything-says-Vice-President-Bill-Oddie.html.
  29. Packham, Chris. 2014. “Stop Spending Money ‘Chasing Cures for Cancer’ and Spend It on Helping Wildlife Instead, Says BBC’s Chris Packham.” Emma Glanfield in Mail Online, May 20. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2633631/Stop-spending-money-chasing-cures-cancer-spend-helping-wildlife-instead-says-BBCs-Chris-Packham.html.
  30. Pattberg, Philipp. 2007. “Conquest, Domination and Control: Europe’s Mastery of Nature in Historic Perspective.” Journal of Political Ecology 14: 1–9.Google Scholar
  31. Pollan, Michael. 2002. “An Animal’s Place.” New York Times Magazine, November 10. http://michaelpollan.com/articles-archive/an-animals-place/.
  32. Preece, Rod, and Lorna Chamberlain. 1995. Animal Welfare and Human Values. Waterloo, ON: Wilfrid Laurier Universety Press. Google Scholar
  33. Preece, Rod, and David Fraser. 2000. “The Status of Animals in Biblical and Christian Thought: A Study in Colliding Values.” Society and Animals 8 (3): 245–263.Google Scholar
  34. Regan, Tom. 2005. Empty Cages. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
  35. Ryder, Richard D. 1983. Victims of Science. London: National Anti-Vivisection Society.Google Scholar
  36. Salisbury, Joyce. 1994. The Beast Within: Animals in the Middle Ages. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  37. Salt, Henry S. 1894. Animals’ Rights Considered in Relation to Social Progress. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  38. Salt, Henry S. 1914. The Humanities of Diet: Some Reasonings and Rhymings. Manchester: The Vegetarian Society.Google Scholar
  39. Sampson, Philip J. 2001. 6 Modern Myths. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press.Google Scholar
  40. Scully, Matthew. 2016. “Unthinkable Today, Obvious Tomorrow: The Moral Case for the Abolition of Cruelty to Animals.” National Review, December 19. http://www.nationalreview.com/article/443161/animal-welfare-standards-animal-cruelty-abolition-morality-factory-farming-animal-use-industries.
  41. Singer, Peter. 2009. “Darwin and the Animals.” The Ideas Festival, Bristol. http://animalrightskorea.org/essays/peter-singer-darwin-and-the-animals.html. Accessed June 6, 2014.
  42. Singer, Peter. 2015. Animal Liberation. London: The Bodley Head.Google Scholar
  43. Stuart, Tristram. 2006. The Bloodless Revolution. London: HarperPress.Google Scholar
  44. Thomas, Keith. 1984. Man and the Natural World. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  45. Toynbee, Arnold. 1974. “The Religious Background of the Present Environmental Crisis.” In Ecology and Religion in History, edited by David and Eileen Spring. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
  46. Westermarck, Edward. 1971. Christianity and Morals. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  47. White, Lynn. 1967. “The Historical Roots of Our Ecological Crisis.” Science 155 (3767): 1203–1207.Google Scholar
  48. Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1992. Philosophical Investigations. Translated by G. E. M. Anscombe. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  49. Young, Richard Alan. 1999. Is God a Vegetarian? Chicago: Open Court.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Oxford Centre for Animal EthicsOxfordUK

Personalised recommendations