Skip to main content

Introduction

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Shifting Capital

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in the History of Economic Thought ((PHET))

  • 492 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter discusses the importance of examining the Act of Union of 1707 as a manifestation of mercantilist economic thought. Placing the Union in the context of economic ideas sheds further light on both the contents of the treaty and the actions of the English and Scottish Parliaments. The definition of mercantilism used in the book, a system of theory and policies that seeks to maximize national power, is examined. Key aspects of English mercantilism employed in legislation before and during the negotiations—warfare without military conquest, the idea of surplus, and particular notions of wealth, power, trade, and transmutation—are introduced. How these are connected to the concept of structural violence is examined. The outline of the rest of the book is also discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Original spellings from primary sources have been preserved throughout the text in quoted material.

  2. 2.

    The only letter of petition in favor of the Union came from the Burgh of Montrose on October 15, 1706. Rather than an enthusiastic endorsement of the Articles however it is more a piece of economic fatalism. The “advantage of the Union,” the petition says, is its elimination of the “English Prohibitory Lawes” of the Alien Act. If the laws were to be reenacted “as they undoubtedly will, we shall be deprived of the only valuable branch of our trade by which the balance is on out side and then one needs not the gift of Prophecy to fortell what shall be the fate of this poor miserable blinded nation in a few years.” The Union was seen not as a liberator of trade as much as a means to prevent further damage (in Cooke and Donnachie 1998, pp. 20–21).

  3. 3.

    In actuality it was not the majority of all Parliamentarians but only of those present who did not abstain. The number of those who voted no, were absent, or abstained, 113, outnumbered those who voted in favor, 110, according to the signatures of the act to vote on the final draft January 16, 1707 (National Records of Scotland 1707).

  4. 4.

    There is also a large religious dimension to the Union debates involving the rights of the Scottish Presbyterian Kirk, which has been explored most recently in Stephen (2007).

  5. 5.

    Istvan Hont (2005) performs this function for contemporary political theory, mostly in relation to Andrew Fletcher, but does not apply economic theory to his analysis. He asserts that England used economics for self-preservation. I argue that political theory and economic theory codetermine each other and more than self-preservation, economic policy is used for self-expansion and aggressive limitations of others’ expansion.

  6. 6.

    The same omission has occurred in the history of economic thought literature. While economists such as S. Todd Lowry, Tony Aspromourgos, Anthony Brewer, and Antoin Murphy have provided excellent analyses of the thought of individual mercantilists and their influence on economic policies, they have not examined how their ideas manifested in major policy such as the Union.

  7. 7.

    The work herein is not exhaustive of the research these issues require, but is presented as a first step toward further inquiry.

  8. 8.

    Citations for the Wealth of Nations refer to book, chapter, and paragraph number.

  9. 9.

    The phrase “oportet patrem-familias vendacem esse, non emacem,” appears in Cato’s De Agricultura.

  10. 10.

    Coincidentally, the main English architect of the Union treaty, John Somers (1697), stressed the idea of trade as an “empire on the sea” (pp. 1–2).

References

  • Armitage, D. 1995. Intellectual Origins of the Darien Venture. In A Union for Empire, ed. J. Robertson, 97–118. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2000. The Empire of the Seas, 1576–1689. In The Ideological Origins of the British Empire, 100–124. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bowie, K. 2007. Scottish Public Opinion and the Anglo-Scottish Union, 1699–1707. Suffolk: Boydell Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, R.H. 1964. The Anglo-Scottish Union of 1707 II, The Economic Consequences. Economic History Review 16: 455–477.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clerk, J. 1892. In Memoirs of the Life of Sir John Clerk of Penicuik, ed. J. Gray. Edinburgh: T. and A. Constable for the Scottish History Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1993. History of the Union of Scotland and England, trans. and ed. D. Duncan. Edinburgh: The Scottish History Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colley, L. 1992. Britons: Forging the Nation, 1707–1837. New Haven: Yale.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooke, A., and I. Donnachie, eds. 1998. Modern Scottish History, 1707 to the Present: Major Documents. Edinburgh: Tuckwell Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davenant, C. 1698. Discourses on the Public Revenues and on the Trade of England. In The Political and Commercial Works, ed. C. Whitworth, vol. 1, 127–459. London: T. Cadell, 1771.

    Google Scholar 

  • Defoe, D. 1706. Caledonia: A Poem in Honour of the Scots and the Scots Nation. Edinburgh: Andrew Anderson.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1799. The History of the Union between England and Scotland. Dublin: John Exshaw.

    Google Scholar 

  • Devine, T.M. 1985. The Union of 1707 and Scottish Development. Scottish Economic and Social History 5 (1): 23–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ekelund, R., and R. Tollison. 1981. Mercantilism as a Rent-Seeking Society. College Station: Texas A&M University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farmer, P. 2005. Pathologies of Power. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, W. 1977. Scotland’s Relations with England: A Survey to 1707. Edinburgh: The Saltire Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finkelstein, A. 2000. Harmony and the Balance: An Intellectual History of the Seventeenth Century. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher, A. 1703. Account of a Conversation. In The Political Works of Andrew Fletcher of Saltoun. London: A. Bettesworth, C. Hitch, and J. Clarke, 1732.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gauci, P. 2001. The Politics of Trade: The Overseas Merchant in State and Society, 1660–1720. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, J.S. 1988. Playing the Scottish Card: The Franco-Jacobite Invasion of 1708. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goulet, D. 1971. The Cruel Choice: A New Concept in the Theory of Development. New York: Atheneum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heckscher, E. 1935. Mercantilism. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hont, I. 2005. Jealousy of Trade. Cambridge: Belknap Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchison, T. 1988. Before Adam Smith. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keynes, J.M. 1936. The General Theory of Employment, Interest, and Money. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knights, M. 2016. Regulation and Rival Interests in the 1690s. In Regulating the British Economy, 1660–1850, ed. P. Gauci, 75–93. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lockhart, G. 1714. Memoirs Concerning the Affairs of Scotland from Queen Anne’s Accession to the Throne to the Commencement of the Union. London: Booksellers of London and Westminster.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacInnes, A. 1990. Influencing the Vote: The Scottish Estates and the Treaty of Union of 1706–7. History Microcomputer Review 2: 11–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2007. Union and Empire: The Making of the United Kingdom in 1707. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Magnusson, L. 1994. Mercantilism: The Shaping of an Economic Language. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2015. The Political Economy of Mercantilism. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Maule, H. 1707. Letter to the Earl of Mar, May 1, 1707, in Historical Manuscripts Commission. Report on the Manuscripts of the Earl of Mar and Kellie Collection. London: HMS Office, 1904, p. 389.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCloskey, D. 1998. The Rhetoric of Economics. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mun, T. 1664. England’s Treasure by Forraign Trade. London: Thomas Clark.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murdoch, A. 2008. The Legacy of Unionism in Eighteenth-Century Scotland. In Scotland and the Union: 1707–2007, ed. T. Devine, 77–90. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Records of Scotland. 1707. Approve of the Act Ratifying and Approving the Treaty of Union, 16 January 1707, RH18/4/14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paterson, W. 1701. Proposals & Reasons for Constituting a Council of Trade. Edinburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rashid, S. 1993. Mercantilism as a Rent-Seeking Society? In Mercantilist Economics, ed. L. Magnusson, 125–142. New York: Kluwer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Riley, P.W.J. 1964. The English Ministers and Scotland, 1707–1727. London: The Athlone Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, J.S. 1999. The Political History of Eighteenth-Century Scotland. London: Palgrave.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. 1776. An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. London: A. Millar and T. Cadell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smout, T.C. 1963. Scottish Trade on the Eve of the Union. Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1964. The Anglo-Scottish Union of 1707. I. The Economic Background. The Economic History Review 16 (3): 455–467.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1969. The Road to Union. In Britain after the Glorious Revolution, ed. G. Holmes, 176–196. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Somers, J. 1697. A Letter, Balancing the Necessity of Keeping a Force in Time of Peace. London.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1730. The True Secret History of the Lives of All the Kings and Queens of England, 2 vols. London: D. Browne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephen, J. 2007. Scottish Presbyterians and the Act of Union of 1707. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Stern, P., and C. Wennerlind. 2014. Mercantilism Reimagined. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaggi, G., and P. Groenewegen. 2003. A Concise History of Economic Thought: From Mercantilism to Monetarism. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Waddell, D. 1958. Charles Davenant (1656–1714)—A Biographical Sketch. The Economic History Review 11 (2): 279–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whately, C. 1989. Causes and Consequences of the Union of 1707: A Survey. Scottish Historical Review 68 (186): 150–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2008. The Scots and the Union. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ramos, A. (2018). Introduction. In: Shifting Capital. Palgrave Studies in the History of Economic Thought. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96403-4_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96403-4_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-96402-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-96403-4

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics