Skip to main content

Spatial Distribution of Local Landmarks in Route-Based Sketch Maps

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Spatial Cognition XI (Spatial Cognition 2018)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 11034))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Landmarks are important elements in route instructions communicated for wayfinding in unfamiliar environments. This paper aims to investigate the distribution of local landmarks in human sketch maps provided for wayfinding purpose. We investigated sets of route instructions given by student participants who were asked to give directions in environments that they are very familiar with to someone unfamiliar. These environments differ in size as well as their relation to city centers. In particular, one route goes into the city, one route goes through the city center, and the third route ranges between two cities. The results show that local landmarks are distributed differently in each route and showing high density of landmarks at some portions of the route. The study further clarifies the distribution of landmarks along routes with relation to the length of the route. It also contributes to the work concerning the cognitive aspects of wayfinding with a specific focus on the distribution of landmarks in route instructions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Allen, G.: Principles and practices for communicating route knowledge. Appl. Cognit. Psychol. 14(4), 333–359 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kuipers, B.: The “map in the head” metaphor. Environ. Behav. 14(2), 202–220 (1982)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Sorrows, M.E., Hirtle, S.C.: The nature of landmarks for real and electronic spaces. In: Freksa, C., Mark, D.M. (eds.) COSIT 1999. LNCS, vol. 1661, pp. 37–50. Springer, Heidelberg (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-48384-5_3

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Denis, M.: The description of routes: a cognitive approach to the production of spatial discourse. Cahiers de psychol. cognit. 16(4), 409–458 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Timpf, S.: Ontologies of wayfinding: a traveler’s perspective. Netw. Spat. Econ. 2(1), 9–33 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Wiener, J., Büchner, S., Hölscher, C.: Towards a taxonomy of wayfinding tasks: a knowledge-based approach. Spat. Cognit. Comput. Interdiscip. J. 9, 152–165 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Raubal, M., Egenhofer, M.: Comparing the complexity of wayfinding tasks in built environments. Environ. Plann. B 25, 895–914 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Nothegger, C., Winter, S., Raubal, M.: Selection of salient features for route directions. Spat. Cognit. Comput. Interdiscip. J. 4(2), 113–136 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Winter, S.: Route adaptive selection of salient features. In: Kuhn, W., Worboys, M.F., Timpf, S. (eds.) COSIT 2003. LNCS, vol. 2825, pp. 349–361. Springer, Heidelberg (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-39923-0_23

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Klippel, A., Winter, S.: Structural salience of landmarks for route directions. In: Cohn, A.G., Mark, D.M. (eds.) COSIT 2005. LNCS, vol. 3693, pp. 347–362. Springer, Heidelberg (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/11556114_22

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Schroder, C., Mackaness, W., Gittings, B.: Giving the ‘right’ route directions: the requirements for pedestrian navigation systems. Trans. GIS 15(3), 419–438 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Dale, R., Geldof, S., Prost, J.-P.: Generating more natural route descriptions. In: Proceedings of the 2002 Australasian, pp. 41–48 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Raubal, M., Winter, S.: Enriching wayfinding instructions with local landmarks. In: Egenhofer, M.J., Mark, D.M. (eds.) GIScience 2002. LNCS, vol. 2478, pp. 243–259. Springer, Heidelberg (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45799-2_17

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Elias, B.: Determination of landmarks and reliability criteria for landmarks (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Tom, A., Denis, M.: Referring to landmark or street information in route directions: what difference does it make? In: Kuhn, W., Worboys, M.F., Timpf, S. (eds.) COSIT 2003. LNCS, vol. 2825, pp. 362–374. Springer, Heidelberg (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-39923-0_24

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Rehrl, K., Leitinger, S., Gartner, G., Ortag, F.: An analysis of direction and motion concepts in verbal descriptions of route choices. In: Hornsby, K.S., Claramunt, C., Denis, M., Ligozat, G. (eds.) COSIT 2009. LNCS, vol. 5756, pp. 471–488. Springer, Heidelberg (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03832-7_29

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Jackson, P.: In search of better route guidance instructions. Ergonomics 41(7), 1000–1013 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Meilinger, T., Knauff, M.: Ask for directions or use a map: a field experiment on spatial orientation and wayfinding in an urban environment. Spat. Sci. 53(2), 13–23 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Denis, M., Pazzaglia, F., Cornoldi, C., Bertolo, L.: Spatial discourse and navigation: an analysis of route directions in the city of Venice. Appl. Cognit. Psychol. 13(2), 145–174 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Michon, P.-E., Denis, M.: When and why are visual landmarks used in giving directions? In: Montello, D.R. (ed.) COSIT 2001. LNCS, vol. 2205, pp. 292–305. Springer, Heidelberg (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45424-1_20

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. Brosset, D., Claramunt, C., Saux, E.: A location and action-based model for route descriptions. In: Fonseca, F., Rodríguez, M.A., Levashkin, S. (eds.) GeoS 2007. LNCS, vol. 4853, pp. 146–159. Springer, Heidelberg (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-76876-0_10

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. Lovelace, K.L., Hegarty, M., Montello, D.R.: Elements of good route directions in familiar and unfamiliar environments. In: Freksa, C., Mark, D.M. (eds.) COSIT 1999. LNCS, vol. 1661, pp. 65–82. Springer, Heidelberg (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-48384-5_5

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. Sadalla, E., Burroughs, W., Staplin, L.: Reference points in spatial cognition. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum.Learn. Mem. 6(5), 516–528 (1980)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Allen, G.L.: From knowledge to words to wayfinding: issues in the production and comprehension of route directions. In: Hirtle, S.C., Frank, A.U. (eds.) COSIT 1997. LNCS, vol. 1329, pp. 363–372. Springer, Heidelberg (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-63623-4_61

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  25. Brosset, D., Claramunt, C., Saux, E.: Wayfinding in natural and urban environments: a comparative study. Cartographica 43(1), 21–30 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Schwering, A., Li, R., Anacta, V.: orientation information in different forms of route instructions. In: Danny Vandenbroucke, B. (ed.) Proceedings on The 16th AGILE International Conference on Geographic Information Science (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Winter, S.: Communication about space. Trans. GIS, Guest Editor. 8(3), 291–296 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  28. Dalton, R.: The secret is to follow your nose: route path selection and angularity. Environ. Behav. 35(1), 107–131 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Elias, B.: Extracting landmarks with data mining methods. In: Kuhn, W., Worboys, M.F., Timpf, S. (eds.) COSIT 2003. LNCS, vol. 2825, pp. 375–389. Springer, Heidelberg (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-39923-0_25

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  30. Dräger, M., Koller, A.: Generation of landmark-based navigation instructions from open-source data. In: Proceedings of the 13th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg, PA, USA, pp. 757–766 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Rousell, A., Hahmann, S., Bakillah, M., Mobasheri, A.: Extraction of landmarks from OpenStreetMap for use in navigational instructions. In: Proceedings of the 18th AGILE Conference on Geographic Information Science, Lisbon, Portugal (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Duckham, M., Winter, S., Robinson, M.: Including landmarks in routing instructions. J. Locat. Based Serv. 4(1), 28–52 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge the support of the German Research Foundation (DFG) with project number SCHW 1372/15-1 and the European Research Council (ERC Starting Grant No. 637645).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vanessa Joy A. Anacta .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Anacta, V.J.A., Li, R., Löwen, H., De Lima Galvao, M., Schwering, A. (2018). Spatial Distribution of Local Landmarks in Route-Based Sketch Maps. In: Creem-Regehr, S., Schöning, J., Klippel, A. (eds) Spatial Cognition XI. Spatial Cognition 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11034. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96385-3_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96385-3_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-96384-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-96385-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics