Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Self-Assessed Lie- and Truth-Telling Abilities: Demographic, Personality, and Behavioral Correlates

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Handbook of Deceptive Communication

Abstract

This chapter reviews demographic, personality, and behavioral correlates of self-assessed lie- and truth-telling abilities. People tend to self-assess their ability to convincingly tell the truth higher than their ability to lie convincingly. The high truth-telling ability assessment rests on the belief that truth-telling is a simple matter of “telling it like it is” and aligns with the general human assumption that most communications are truthful. In this context, it is interesting to study the state of mind of people who tend to rate their ability to convince when telling the truth lower than average. The relatively poor lie-telling ability rating is based on the desire to sustain a positive self-image. Thus, if one is not a skilled lie-teller, they may believe that they are an honest person. Therefore, attention should be directed to people who overrate their lie-telling ability. Implications and directions for future research are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 299.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • *References marked with an asterisk refer to studies included in the mini meta-analysis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ariely, D. (2012). The (honest) truth about dishonesty. New York: HarperCollins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review,84, 191–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1992). Exercise of personal agency through the self-efficacy mechanisms. In R. Schwarzer (Ed.), Self-efficacy: Thought control of actions (pp. 3–38). Washington, DC: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W. H. Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1991). The Big Five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology,44, 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Shakhar, G., & Elaad, E. (2003). The validity of psychophysiological detection of information with the Guilty Knowledge Test: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Applied Psychology,88, 131–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bond, C. F., Jr., & DePaulo, B. M. (2006). Accuracy of deception judgments. Personality and Social Psychology Review,10, 214–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braver, S. L., Thoemmes, F. J., & Rosenthal, R. (2014). Continuously cumulating meta-analysis and replicability. Perspectives on Psychological Science,9, 333–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buller, D. B., & Burgoon, J. K. (1996). Interpersonal deception theory. Communication Theory,3, 203–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conrads, J., Irlenbusch, B., & Rilke, R. M. (2013). Lying and team incentives. Journal of Economic Psychology,34, 1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Day, N. E., Hudson, D., Dobies, P. R., & Waris, R. (2011). Student or situation? Personality and classroom context as predictors of attitudes about business school cheating. Social Psychology of Education,14, 261–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Debey, E., De Schryver, M., Logan, G. D., Suchotzki, K., & Verschuere, B. (2015). From junior to senior Pinocchio: A cross-sectional lifespan investigation of deception. Acta Psychologica,160, 58–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Di Fabio, A., & Palazzeschi, L. (2013). Incremental variance in indecisiveness due to cognitive failure compared to fluid intelligence and personality traits. Personality and Individual Differences,54, 261–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elaad, E. (2003). Effects of feedback on the overestimated capacity to detect lies and the underestimated ability to tell lies. Applied Cognitive Psychology,17, 349–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Elaad, E. (2006). How ideological crisis and prolonged external threat affect self-assessed abilities to tell and detect lies and truths. Social Issues in Israel, 1, 160–173 (Text in Hebrew).

    Google Scholar 

  • *Elaad, E. (2009). Lie-detection biases among male police interrogators, prisoners and lay-persons. Psychological Reports, 105, 1047–1056.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Elaad, E. (2015a). The distrusted truth: Examination of challenged perceptions and expectations. Psychology, 6, 560–571.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Elaad, E. (2015b). Criminal prosecutors: Highly assessed lie-detection abilities and beliefs about defendants’ deception. Annals of Forensic Research and Analysis, 2(2), 1017.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elaad, E. (2016). Older adults’ self-assessment of their abilities to tell and detect lies and truths: The case of occupants of protected nursing homes. Unpublished manuscript.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Elaad, E. (2018). Personality, religiosity, and self-assessed abilities to tell and detect lies, tell truths, and believe others. Advances in Applied Psychology, 3(1), 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Elaad, E., Lavy, S., Cohenca, D., Berholz, E., Thee, P., & Ben-Gigi, Y. (2012). Lies, truths, and attachment orientations in late adolescence. Personality and Individual Differences, 52(6), 670–673.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Elaad, E., & Reizer, A. (2015). Personality correlates of the self-assessed abilities to tell and detect lies, tell truths and believe others. Journal of Individual Differences, 36, 163–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Elaad, E., & Sommerfeld, E. (2016). Effects of guilt, disbelief, and assessed lie-truth telling abilities on physiological responses in the Guilty Action Test. Psychology, 7, 1075–1091.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feingold, A. (1994). Gender differences in personality: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin,116, 429–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gillath, O., Sesko, A. K., Shaver, P. R., & Chun, D. S. (2010). Attachment, authenticity, and honesty: Dispositional and experimentally induced security can reduce self-and other-deception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,98, 841–855.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilovich, T., Savitsky, K., & Medvec, V. (1998). The illusion of transparency: Biased assessments of others’ ability to read one’s emotional states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,75, 332–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goh, J. X., Hall, J. A., & Rosenthal, R. (2016). Mini meta-analysis of your own studies: Some arguments on why and a primer on how. Social and Personality Psychology Compass,10, 535–549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grieve, R., & Hayes, J. (2013). Does perceived ability to deceive = ability to deceive? Predictive validity of the perceived ability to deceive (PATD) scale. Personality and Individual Differences,54, 311–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (1990). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplar, M. E., & Gordon, A. K. (2004). The enigma of altruistic lying: Perspective differences in what motivates and justifies lie telling within romantic relationships. Personal Relationships,11, 489–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kashy, D. A., & DePaulo, B. M. (1996). Who lies? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 1037–1051.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kassin, S. M. (2005). On the psychology of confessions: Does innocence put innocents at risk? American Psychologist, 60, 215–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamarche, V. M., & Murray, S. L. (2014). Selectively myopic? Self-esteem and attentional bias in response to potential relationship threats. Social Psychological & Personality Science,5, 786–795.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lykken, D. T. (1998). A Tremor in the blood: Uses and abuses of the lie detection (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Plenum Trade.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maner, J. K. (2014). Let’s put our money where our mouth is: If authors are to change their ways, reviewers (and editors) must change with them. Perspectives on Psychological Science,9, 343–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masip, J., Garrido, E., & Herrero, C. (2004). Facial appearance and impressions of credibility: The effects of facial babyishness and age on person perception. International Journal of Psychology,39, 276–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T., Jr. (1997). Personality trait structure as a human universal. American Psychologist,52, 509–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meissner, C. A., & Kassin, S. M. (2002). “He’s guilty!”: Investigator bias in judgments of truth and deception. Law and Human Behavior,26, 469–480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G. R., & Stiff, J. B. (1993). Deceptive communication. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, S. B., & DeShon, R. R. (2002). Combining effect size estimates in meta-analysis with repeated measures and independent-groups design. Psychological Methods,7, 105–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruffman, T., Murray, J., Halberstadt, J., & Vater, T. (2012). Age-related differences in deception. Psychology and Aging,27, 543–549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, T. J., & Goffin, R. D. (2012). Perceived ability to deceive and incremental prediction in pre-employment personality testing. Personality and Individual Differences,52, 806–811.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spiro, R., Feltovich, P., Jacobson, M., & Coulson, R. (1992). Cognitive flexibility, constructivism, and hypertext: Random access instruction for advanced knowledge acquisition in ill-structured domains. In T. Duffy & D. Jonassen (Eds.), Constructivism and the technology of instruction (pp. 57–75). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science,185, 1124–1131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vrij, A. (2008). Detecting lies and deceit: Pitfalls and opportunities (2nd ed.). Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, L. A., & DeSteno, D. (2008). Pride and perseverance: The motivational role of pride. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,94, 1007–1017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, E. F., & Gilovich, T. (2008). Do people really believe they are above average? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 1121–1128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yaacov, T. (2017). Effects of plausibility, personality and self-assessed abilities to tell and detect lies and truths, on the tendency to prefer lies over truths (Unpublished M.A. thesis). Department of Psychology, Ariel University.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Behavioral Sciences, Ariel University, Ariel, Israel

    Eitan Elaad

Authors
  1. Eitan Elaad
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eitan Elaad .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Communication Studies, University of Wisconsin-La Crosse, La Crosse, WI, USA

    Tony Docan-Morgan

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Elaad, E. (2019). Self-Assessed Lie- and Truth-Telling Abilities: Demographic, Personality, and Behavioral Correlates. In: Docan-Morgan, T. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Deceptive Communication. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96334-1_23

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation