Abstract
The ability to deceive others relies on the use of cognitive processes to construct a believable falsehood and maintain that lie over time. In this chapter, we discuss research that documents how the act of lying can influence the content of liars’ memories for the occasions when they lied and memories of the original experience. In addition, we describe how an understanding of memory processes can be a tool for uncovering deception. For instance, the content of memories of actual and fabricated events differ in characteristic ways, and people can be trained to utilize these features to discriminate between them. Furthermore, it is possible to magnify differences in the reports of liars and truth-tellers to increase detection. Memory can play a critical role in catching liars.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Amado, B. G., Arce, R., & Fariña, F. (2015). Undeutsch hypothesis and criteria based content analysis: A meta-analytic review. The European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context,7(1), 3–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpal.2014.11.002.
Amado, B. G., Arce, R., Fariña, F., & Vilariño, M. (2016). Criteria-based content analysis (CBCA) reality criteria in adults: A meta-analytic review. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology,16(2), 201–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijchp.2016.01.002.
Bogaard, G., Meijer, E. H., & Vrij, A. (2014). Using an example statement increases information but does not increase accuracy of CBCA, RM, and SCAN. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling,11(2), 151–163. https://doi.org/10.1002/jip.1409.
Bond, C. F., & DePaulo, B. M. (2006). Accuracy of deception judgments. Personality and Social Psychology Review,10(3), 214–234. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr1003_2.
Colwell, L. H., Colwell, K., Hiscock-Anisman, C. K., Hartwig, M., Cole, L., Werdin, K., et al. (2012). Teaching professionals to detect deception: The efficacy of a brief training workshop. Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice,12(1), 68–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228932.2012.629592.
Colwell, K., Hiscock-Anisman, C. K., Memon, A., Taylor, L., & Prewett, J. (2007). Assessment criteria indicative of deception (ACID): An integrated system of investigative interviewing and detecting deception. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling,4(3), 167–180. https://doi.org/10.1002/jip.73.
Colwell, K., James-Kangal, N., Hiscock-Anisman, C., & Phelan, V. (2015). Should police use ACID? Training and credibility assessment using transcripts versus recordings. Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice,15(3), 226–247. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228932.2015.1035187.
Crozier, W. E., Strange, D., & Loftus, E. F. (2017). Memory errors in alibi generation: How an alibi can turn against us. Behavioral Sciences & the Law,35(1), 6–17. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.2273.
Debey, E., Verschuere, B., & Crombez, G. (2012). Lying and executive control: An experimental investigation using ego depletion and goal neglect. Acta Psychologica,140(2), 133–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2012.03.004.
DePaulo, B. M., Lindsay, J. L., Malone, B. E., Muhlenbruck, L., Charlton, K., & Cooper, H. (2003). Cues to deception. Psychological Bulletin,129, 74–118. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.129.1.74.
Dianiska, R. E., Lane S. M., & Cash, D. K. (2016). Type of lie differentially influences forgetting and false memory. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Psychology-Law Society, Atlanta, GA.
Evans, J. R., Meissner, C. A., Ross, A. B., Houston, K. A., Russano, M. B., & Horgan, A. J. (2013). Obtaining guilty knowledge in human intelligence interrogations: Comparing accusatorial and information-gathering approaches with a novel experimental paradigm. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition,2(2), 83–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2013.03.002.
Evans, J. R., & Michael, S. W. (2014). Detecting deception in non-native English speakers. Applied Cognitive Psychology,28(2), 226–237. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.2990.
Evans, J. R., Michael, S. W., Meissner, C. A., & Brandon, S. E. (2013). Validating a new assessment method for deception detection: Introducing a psychologically based credibility assessment tool. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 2(1), 33–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2013.02.002.
Ewens, S., Vrij, A., Leal, S., Mann, S., Jo, E., Shaboltas, A., et al. (2016). Using the model statement to elicit information and cues to deceit from native speakers, non-native speakers and those talking through an interpreter. Applied Cognitive Psychology,30(6), 854–862. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3270.
Fisher, R. P. (1995). Interviewing victims and witnesses of crime. Psychology, Public Policy, & Law,1, 732–764. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8971.1.4.732.
Fisher, R. P., & Geiselman, R. E. (1992). Memory-enhancing techniques in investigative interviewing: The cognitive interview. Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas.
Fisher, R. P., Vrij, A., & Leins, D. A. (2013). Does testimonial inconsistency indicate memory inaccuracy and deception? Beliefs, empirical research, and theory. Applied issues in investigative interviewing, eyewitness memory, and credibility assessment (pp. 173–189). New York: Springer.
Garry, M., Manning, C. G., Loftus, E. F., & Sherman, S. J. (1996). Imagination inflation: Imagining a childhood event inflates confidence that it occurred. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,3(2), 208–214. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03212420.
Geiselman, R. E. (2012). The cognitive interview for suspects (CIS). American Journal of Forensic Psychology, 30, 5–20. Retrieved from http://www.thectkgroup.com/pdf/cognitiveinterview.pdf.
Harvey, A. C., Vrij, A., Leal, S., Hope, L., & Mann, S. (2017). Deception and decay: Verbal lie detection as a function of delay and encoding quality. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 6(3), 306–318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.04.002.
Harvey, A. C., Vrij, A., Leal, S., Lafferty, M., & Nahari, G. (2017). Insurance based lie detection: Enhancing the verifiability approach with a model statement component. Acta Psychologica, 174, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2017.01.001.
Harvey, A. C., Vrij, A., Nahari, G., & Ludwig, K. (2017). Applying the verifiability approach to insurance claims settings: Exploring the effect of the information protocol. Legal and Criminological Psychology,22(1), 47–59. https://doi.org/10.1111/lcrp.12092.
Hauch, V., Sporer, S. L., Michael, S. W., & Meissner, C. A. (2016). Does training improve the detection of deception? A meta-analysis. Communication Research,43(3), 283–343. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650214534974.
Henkel, L. A., & Coffman, K. J. (2004). Memory distortions in coerced false confessions: A source monitoring framework analysis. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 18, 567–588. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acp.1026.
Jacoby, L. L., Woloshyn, V., & Kelley, C. (1989). Becoming famous without being recognized: Unconscious influences of memory produced by dividing attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,118, 115–125. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.118.2.115.
Johnson, M. K., Hashtroudi, S., & Lindsay, D. S. (1993). Source monitoring. Psychological Bulletin,114, 3–28. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.114.1.3.
Johnson, M. K., & Raye, C. L. (1981). Reality monitoring. Psychological Review,88, 67–85. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.88.1.67.
Kassin, S. M., Meissner, C. A., & Norwick, R. J. (2005). “I’d know a false confession if I saw one”: A comparative study of college students and police investigators. Law and Human Behavior,29(2), 211–227. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-005-2416-9.
Kassin, S. M., & Norwick, R. J. (2004). Why people waive their Miranda rights: The power of innocence. Law and Human Behavior,28(2), 211–221. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:LAHU.0000022323.74584.f5.
Köhnken, G., Schimossek, E., Aschermann, E., & Hofer, E. (1995). The cognitive interview and the assessment of the credibility of adults’ statements. Journal of Applied Psychology,80, 671–684. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.80.6.671.
Lane, S. M., & Meissner, C. A. (2008). A ‘middle road’ approach to bridging the basic-applied divide in eyewitness identification research. Applied Cognitive Psychology,22, 779–787. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1482.
Leal, S., Vrij, A., Warmelink, L., Vernham, Z., & Fisher, R. P. (2015). You cannot hide your telephone lies: Providing a model statement as an aid to detect deception in insurance telephone calls. Legal and Criminological Psychology,20(1), 129–146. https://doi.org/10.1111/lcrp.12017.
Leins, D., Fisher, R., & Ross, S. (2013). Exploring liars’ strategies for creating deceptive reports. Legal and Criminological Psychology,18(1), 141–151. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8333.2011.02041.x.
Leins, D., Fisher, R. P., Vrij, A., Leal, S., & Mann, S. (2011). Using sketch drawing to induce inconsistency in liars. Legal and Criminological Psychology,16(2), 253–265. https://doi.org/10.1348/135532510X501775.
Lindsay, D. S. (2008). Source monitoring. In H. L. Roediger, III (Ed.), Cognitive psychology of memory. Vol. 2 of learning and memory: A comprehensive reference, 4 vols (J. Byrne, Editor) (pp. 325–348). Oxford: Elsevier.
Loftus, E. F., Miller, D. G., & Burns, H. J. (1978). Semantic integration of verbal information into a visual memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory,4(1), 19–31. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.4.1.19.
Masip, J., Sporer, S. L., Garrido, E., & Herrero, C. (2005). The detection of deception with the reality monitoring approach: A review of the empirical evidence. Psychology, Crime & Law,11(1), 99–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/10683160410001726356.
Meissner, C. A., & Kassin, S. M. (2002). “He’s guilty!”: Investigator bias in judgments of truth and deception. Law and Human Behavior,26(5), 469–480. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020278620751.
Meissner, C. A., Kelly, C. E., & Woestehoff, S. A. (2015). Improving the effectiveness of suspect interrogations. Annual Review of Law and Social Science,11, 211–233. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-120814-121657.
Memon, A., Fraser, J., Colwell, K., Odinot, G., & Mastroberardino, S. (2010). Distinguishing truthful from invented accounts using reality monitoring criteria. Legal and Criminological Psychology,15(2), 177–194. https://doi.org/10.1348/135532508x401382.
Memon, A., Meissner, C. A., & Fraser, J. (2010). The cognitive interview: A meta-analytic review and study space analysis of the past 25 years. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 16, 340–372. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020518.
Nahari, G., Leal, S., Vrij, A., Warmelink, L., & Vernham, Z. (2014). Did somebody see it? Applying the verifiability approach to insurance claim interviews. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 11(3), 237-243. https://doi.org/10.1002/jip.1417.
Nahari, G., & Vrij, A. (2014). Can I borrow your alibi? The applicability of the verifiability approach to the case of an alibi witness. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition,3(2), 89–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2014.04.005.
Nahari, G., Vrij, A., & Fisher, R. P. (2014). Exploiting liars’ verbal strategies by examining the verifiability of details. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 19(2), 227–239. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8333.2012.02069.x.
Otgaar, H., Howe, M. L., Memon, A., & Wang, J. (2014). The development of differential mnemonic effects of false denials and forced confabulations. Behavioral Sciences & the Law,32(6), 718–731. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.2148.
Otgaar, H., Howe, M. L., Smeets, T., & Wang, J. (2016). Denial-induced forgetting: False denials undermine memory, but external denials undermine belief. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition,5(2), 168–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2016.04.002.
Perfect, T. J., Wagstaff, G. F., Moore, D., Andrews, B., Cleveland, V., Newcombe, S., et al. (2008). How can we help witnesses to remember more? It’s an (eyes) open and shut case. Law and Human Behavior,32, 314–324. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-007-9109-5.
Polage, D. C. (2004). Fabrication deflation? The mixed effects of lying on memory. Applied Cognitive Psychology,18(4), 455–465. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.995.
Polage, D. C. (2012). Fabrication inflation increases as source monitoring ability decreases. Acta Psychologica,139(2), 335–342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2011.12.007.
Smith, S. M., & Vela, E. (2001). Environmental context-dependent memory: A review and meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,8(2), 203–220. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196157.
Sooniste, T., Granhag, P. A., Strömwall, L. A., & Vrij, A. (2015). Statements about true and false intentions: Using the cognitive interview to magnify the differences. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology,56, 371–378. https://doi.org/10.1111/sjop.12216.
Sporer, S. L. (2004). Reality monitoring and the detection of deception. In P. A. Granhag & L. A. Strömwall (Eds.), The detection of deception in forensic contexts (pp. 64–102). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511490071.004.
Sporer, S. L., & Schwandt, B. (2006). Paraverbal indicators of deception: A meta-analytic synthesis. Applied Cognitive Psychology,20, 421–446. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1190.
Sporer, S. L., & Schwandt, B. (2007). Moderators of nonverbal indicators of deception: A meta-analytic synthesis. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law,13, 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8971.13.1.1.
Sporer, S. L., & Sharman, S. J. (2006). Should I believe this? Reality monitoring of accounts of self-experienced and invented recent and distant autobiographical events. Applied Cognitive Psychology,20(6), 837–854. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1234.
Steel, E., & Somaiya, R. (2015, February 10). Brian Williams suspended from NBC for 6 months without pay. New York Times. www.nytimes.com/2015/02/11/business/media/brian-williams-suspended-by-nbc-news-for-six-months.html.
Steller, M. (1989). Recent developments in statement analysis. In J. C. Yuille (Ed.), Credibility assessment (pp. 135–154). Deventer, Holland: Kluwer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-7856-1_8.
Steller, M., & Köhnken, G. (1989). Criteria-based statement analysis. Credibility assessment of children’s testimonies in sexual abuse cases. In D. Raskin (Ed.), Psychological techniques in law enforcement, 217–245. New York: Springer-Verlag.
Suchotzki, K., Verschuere, B., Van Bockstaele, B., Ben-Shakhar, G., & Crombez, G. (2017). Lying takes time: A meta-analysis on reaction time measures of deception. Psychological Bulletin,143(4), 428–453. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000087.
Vernham, Z., Vrij, A., Mann, S., Leal, S., & Hillman, J. (2014). Collective interviewing: Eliciting cues to deceit using a turn-taking approach. Psychology, Public Policy and Law,20, 309–324. https://doi.org/10.1037/law0000015.
Vieira, K. M., & Lane, S. M. (2013). How you lie affects what you remember. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition,2(3), 173–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2013.05.005.
Visu-Petra, G., Varga, M., Miclea, M., & Visu-Petra, L. (2013). When interference helps: Increasing executive load to facilitate deception detection in the concealed information test. Frontiers in Psychology, 4. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00146.
Vrij, A. (2015). Verbal lie detection tools: Statement validity analysis, reality monitoring and scientific content analysis. In P. A. Granhag, A. Vrij, & B. Verschuere (Eds.), Detecting deception: Current challenges and cognitive approaches (pp. 3–35). Chichester: Wiley.
Vrij, A., Fisher, R. P., & Blank, H. (2017). A cognitive approach to lie detection: A meta-analysis. Legal and Criminological Psychology,22(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/lcrp.12088.
Vrij, A., & Granhag, P. A. (2012). Eliciting cues to deception and truth: What matters are the questions asked. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition,1(2), 110–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2012.02.004.
Vrij, A., Leal, S., Granhag, P. A., Mann, S., Fisher, R. P., Hillman, J., et al. (2009). Outsmarting the liars: The benefit of asking unanticipated questions. Law and Human Behavior,33(2), 159–166. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-008-9143-y.
Vrij, A., Mann, S. A., Fisher, R. P., Leal, S., Milne, R., & Bull, R. (2008). Increasing cognitive load to facilitate lie detection: The benefit of recalling an event in reverse order. Law and Human Behavior,32(3), 253–265. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-007-9103-y.
Vrij, A., Mann, S., Leal, S., & Fisher, R. (2010). ‘Look into my eyes’: Can an instruction to maintain eye contact facilitate lie detection? Psychology, Crime & Law,16(4), 327–348. https://doi.org/10.1080/10683160902740633.
Vrij, A., Mann, S., Leal, S., Vernham, Z., & Vaughan, M. (2016). Train the trainers: A first step towards a science-based cognitive lie detection training workshop delivered by a practitioner. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling,13(2), 110–130. https://doi.org/10.1002/jip.1443.
Zaragoza, M. S., & Lane, S. M. (1994). Source misattributions and the suggestibility of eyewitness memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition,20, 934–945. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.20.4.934.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Dianiska, R.E., Cash, D.K., Lane, S.M., Meissner, C.A. (2019). The Reciprocal Nature of Lying and Memory: Memory Confabulation and Diagnostic Cues to Deception. In: Docan-Morgan, T. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Deceptive Communication. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96334-1_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96334-1_18
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-96333-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-96334-1
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)