Abstract
This chapter analyzes the transnational lives of 25 Chinese Singaporean who lived in Hong Kong in 2009, focusing on their (dis)embeddedness in transnational work, family, and/or friendships/lifestyle contexts. These different transnational spaces spanned Hong Kong, Singapore, frequently mainland China, and possibly western and English-speaking, and/or other asian, societies. This research shows that the Chinese Singaporeans mostly reckoned that their transnational work contexts were incongruous because they either lacked cultural capital in Hong Kong, and/or in mainland China, and/or did not wish to adapt Hong Kong, and/or mainland, Chinese definitions of appropriate practices of socialities. On the other hand, this research yields that the Chinese Singaporeans thought that their transnational family socialities nearly always were homogenous. The analysis of the participants’ transnational friendships/lifestyle contexts yields that these contexts also foremost were experienced as homogenous, often because the Chinese Singaporeans preferred friendships with people in Hong Kong who did not have differences that the participants assessed as too high to be bridged.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
Only two participants were university students in Hong Kong. Their transnational education contexts are referred to in this chapter in terms of how they fit with others of the Hong Kong participants’ transnational contexts: work, and friendships/lifestyle.
- 2.
One participant had just resigned from her job. She is included as a ‘working’ participant to consider her work experience in Hong Kong and elsewhere.
- 3.
Onwumechili et al. (2003) think this applies also to migrants who return to live in a society in which they lived before. This is because the migrants, and people and collectivities who did not move, changed while the migrants lived abroad.
- 4.
Hong Kong and Singapore often are listed in global rankings as being among the most expensive cities to live in.
References
Appadurai, Arjun. 1990. “Disjuncture and Difference in the Global Cultural Economy.” Public Culture 2 (2): 1–24.
Beaverstock, Jonathan V. 2005. “Transnational Elites in the City: British Highly Skilled Inter-company Transferees in New York City’s Financial District.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 31 (2): 245–68.
Beaverstock, Jonathan V. 2011. “Serving British Expatriate ‘Talent’ in Singapore: Exploring Ordinary Transnationalism and the Role of the ‘Expatriate’ Club.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 37 (5): 709–28.
Borjas, George J. 2015. “Economics of Migration.” In International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2nd ed., edited by James D. Wright, 436–39. Amsterdam: Elsevier. Accessed December 21, 2018. http://www.sciencedirect.com.liverpoolIdm.oclc.org/science/article/pii/B978008068710294.
Calhoun, Craig. 2008. “Cosmopolitanism in the Modern Social Imaginary.” Daedalus 137 (3): 105–14.
Chase, Susan E. 2005. “Learning to Listen: Narrative Principles in a Qualitative Research.” In Up Close and Personal: The Teaching and Leaning of Narrative Research, edited by Ruthellen Josselson, Amia Lieblich, and Dan P. McAdams, 79–99. Washington: American Psychological Association.
Cottrell, Catheline A., Steven L. Neuberg, and Steven L. Li. 2007. “What Do People Desire in Others? A Sociofunctional Perspective on the Importance of Different Valued Characteristics.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 92 (2): 208–31.
Falzon, Mark-Anthony. 2009. “Multi-sited Ethnography: Theory, Praxis, and Locality in Contemporary Research.” In Multi-sited Ethnography: Theory, Praxis, and Locality in Contemporary Research, edited by Mark-Anthony Falzon, 1–23. Abingdon: Routledge.
Glick Schiller, Nina, Tsypylma Darieva, and Sandra Gruner-Domic. 2011. “Defining Cosmopolitan Sociability in a Transnational Age.” Ethnic and Racial Studies 34 (3): 399–418.
Hing, Ai Yun. 2013. “Children and Their Fathers in Singapore: A Generational Perspective.” In The International Handbook of the Chinese Family, edited by Kwok Bun Chan, 323–41. New York: Springer.
Horesh, Niv. 2013. “Development Trajectories: Hong Kong vs. Shanghai.” Asia Pacific Economic Literature 27 (1): 27–39.
Huntington, Samuel P. 1996. The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Kau, James B., and C. F. Sirmans. 1976. “New, Repeat, and Return Migration: A Study of Migrant Types.” Southern Economic Journal 43 (2): 1144–48.
Kennedy, Paul. 2004. “Making Global Society: Friendship Networks Among Transnational Professionals in the Building Design Industry.” Global Networks 4 (2): 157–79.
Koh, Aaron. 2007. “Living with Globalization Tactically: The Metapragmatics of Globalization in Singapore.” Journal of Social Issues in Southeast Asia 22 (2): 179–201.
Leonard, Pauline. 2010. “Work, Identity and Change? Post/Colonial Encounters in Hong Kong.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 36 (8): 1246–63.
Ley, David. 2004. “Transnational Spaces and Everyday Lives.” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 29 (2): 151–64.
Moore, Fiona. 2016. “City of Sojourners Versus City of Settlers: Transnationalism, Location and Identity Among Taiwanese Professionals in London and Toronto.” Global Networks 16 (3): 372–90.
Nauck, Bernard. 2001. “Intercultural Contact and Intergenerational Transmission in Immigrant Families.” Journal of Cross Cultural Psychology 32 (2): 159–73.
Nowicka, Magdalena. 2006. Transnational Professionals and Their Cosmopolitan Universe. Frankfurt: Campus Verlag.
Onwumechili, Chucka, Ronald Nwosu, Ronald L. Jackson II., and Jacqueline James-Hughes. 2003. “In the Deep Valley with Mountains to Climb: Exploring Identity and Multiple Reacculturation.” International Journal of Intercultural Relations 27 (1): 41–62.
Patton, Michael Quin. 2002. Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Phoenix, Ann. 2008. “Transforming Transnational Biographical Memories: Adult Accounts of ‘Non-normative’ Serial Migrant Childhoods.” In Ethnicity Belonging and Biography: Ethnographical and Biographical Perspectives, edited by in Gabriele Rosenthal and Arthur Bogner, 267–84. Münster: LIT Verlag.
Pieterse, Nederveen Jan. 2004. Globalization and Culture: Global Melange. Lanham: Rowan and Littlefield.
Plüss, Caroline. 2005. “Constructing Globalised Ethnicity: Migrants from India in Hong Kong.” International Sociology 20 (2): 203–26.
Portes, Alejandro. 2004. “Global Villagers: The Rise of Transnational Communities.” In Migration, Globalization and Ethnic Relations: An Interdisciplinary Approach, edited by Mohsen M. Mobasher and Mahmoud Sadri, 228–32. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
Pritchard, Rosalind. 2011. “Re-entry-Trauma: Asian Re-integration After Study in the West.” Journal of Studies of International Education 15 (1): 93–111.
Rutten, Mario, and Sanderien Verstappen. 2014. “Middling Migration: Contradictory Mobility Experiences of Indian Youth in London.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 40 (8): 1217–35.
Savage, Mike, and Tony Bennett. 2005. “Editors’ Introduction: Cultural Capital and Social Inequality.” The British Journal of Sociology 56 (1): 1–11.
Snel, Erik, Godfried Engbersen, and Arjen Leekers. 2006. “Transnational Involvement and Social Integration.” Global Networks 6 (3): 285–308.
Stevenson, Nick. 1997. “Globalization, National Cultures and Cultural Citizenship.”’ The Sociological Quarterly 38 (1): 41–66.
Sussman, Nan M. 2013. “Reforming Family Among Remigrants: Hongkongers Come Home.” In International Handbook of the Chinese Family, edited by Kwok Bun Chan, 53–75. New York: Springer.
Szelényi, Katalin, and Robert A. Rhoads. 2007. “Citizenship in a Global Context: The Perspectives of International Graduate Student in the United States.” Comparative Education Review 51 (1): 25–47.
Takenaka, Ayumi. 2015. The Life of a Multiple Migrant. Oxford: COMPAS. Accessed November 5, 2016. https://www.compas.ox.ac.uk/2015/the-life-of-a-multiple-migrant/.
Taylor, Peter, Ben Derudder, Michael Hoyler, Pengfei Ni, and Frank Witlox. 2014. “City-Dyad Analyses of China’s Integration into the World City Network.” Urban Studies 51 (5): 868–82.
Voon, Puah Chin, and Jason Loh. 2008. “Filial Piety and Intergenerational Co-residence: The Case of Chinese Singaporeans.” Asian Journal of Social Sciences 36 (3–4): 659–79.
Zhou, Min. 2014. “Segmented Assimilation and Socio-Economic Integration of Chinese Immigrant Children in the USA.” Ethnic and Racial Studies 37 (7): 1172–83.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Plüss, C. (2018). Being Chinese in a Chinese Global City: Hong Kong. In: Transnational Lives in Global Cities. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96331-0_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96331-0_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-96330-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-96331-0
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)