Advertisement

Inequality, Intention, and Ignorance: Socrates on Punishment and the Human Good

  • Terry PennerEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Philosophical Studies Series book series (PSSP, volume 132)

Abstract

I examine here a wide array of interlocking Socratic doctrines, especially as they show up in the ideas of Socratic Ignorance and the Examined Life (asking questions every day of others and of oneself)—along with such other Socratic claims as the following. First, that No one errs willingly. Second, that, in acting intentionally, everyone is always seeking their own greatest available good, given their present circumstances, where that greatest good is taken over the rest of their lives. Third, that those who don’t see that harming others will not, over the rest of their lives, serve their own greatest good, deserve not punishment but instruction. I conduct this examination with my eye on two blatant contemporary inequalities across race and class. The first is that involved in differentially funding different schools and thereby shortchanging the ability of those of our children who need it most to work out better means to their own greatest good over the rest of their lives; the second is that across race, class, and educational background in our extensive incarceration practices. In the longest part of this essay, I argue that a principal philosophical presupposition of punishment practices can be shown to be well wide of the mark by the Socratic theory I explore here. This is the presupposition that there is some kind of philosophical justification—for example, in modern “under the description” theories—for the decidedly questionable view that we can almost always determine quite sufficiently what a person’s intentions are for purposes of justifiably and usefully punishing supposed malefactors.

Keywords

Action Good Harm Ignorance Intention Punishment 

References

  1. Alexander, M. 2012. The new Jim Crow. New York: New Press.Google Scholar
  2. Annie E. Casey foundation. 2016. A shared sentence. Retrieved from http://www.aecf.org/m/resourcedoc/aecf-asharedsentence-2016.pdf.
  3. Anscombe, G.E.M. 1958a. Intention. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  4. ———. 1958b. Modern moral philosophy. Philosophy 33 (124): 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bauman, Z. 1989. Modernity and the holocaust. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  6. Beaney, M. 1997. The Frege reader. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  7. Benson, H. 2000. Socratic wisdom: The model of knowledge in Plato’s early dialogues. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Boys-Stones, G., and C. Rowe. 2013. The circle of Socrates. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
  9. Bozelko, C. 2016. The prison-commercial complex. New York Times.Google Scholar
  10. Brickhouse, T., and Smith, N. 2010. Socratic moral philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Camus, A. 1946. The Stranger. Trans. D. Ortega. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
  12. Christie, N. 2004. A suitable amount of crime. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chu, A., and T. Penner. 2017. Socrates from a logical point of view. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
  14. Chu, A., P. Mooney, and T. Penner. 2017. Socrates and the irrational. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
  15. Darabont, F. 1994. The Shawshank redemption (film script, screens 37 and 38). Retrieved from http://www.scripts.com/script.php?id=29&p=37.
  16. Davidson, D. 1963. Actions, reasons and causes. Journal of Philosophy 60: 685–700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Davidson, D. 1970. How is weakness of will possible? In Davidson 1980.Google Scholar
  18. ———. 1980. Essays on actions and events. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Devereux, D. 1995. Socrates’ Kantian conception of virtue. Journal of the History of Philosophy 33: 381–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dreisinger, B. 2016. Incarceration nations: A journey to justice in prisons around the world. New York: Other Press.Google Scholar
  21. Duff, A. 2013. Legal punishment. In Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy, summer 2013 ed, ed. E.N. Zalta. Retrieved from http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2013/entries/legal-punishment/.
  22. Frege, G. 1884. The Foundations of Arithmetic. Trans. J.L. Austin. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  23. ———. 1891. Function and Concept. In M. Beaney 1997, 130–148.Google Scholar
  24. ———. 1892. On Sense and Reference. In M. Beaney 1997, 151–171.Google Scholar
  25. Gödel, K. 1944. Russell’s mathematical logic. In The Philosophy of Bertrand Russell, ed. P.A. Schillp, 123–153. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Goldberger, J. 2013. Life of a king. USA: Animus Films.Google Scholar
  27. Goodman, N. 1952. Sense and certainty. Philosophical Review 49: 162–163.Google Scholar
  28. Gottschalk, M. 2016. Caught: The prison state and the lockdown of American politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Hager, E., and A. Santo. 2016. Private prisoner vans’ long road of neglect. New York Times.Google Scholar
  30. Hamer, B. 2016. Records show [Governor Scott] Walker wanted to change Wisconsin idea. Badger Herald. Retrieved from https://badgerherald.com/news/2016/05/27/records-show-walker-wanted-to-change-wisconsin-idea/.
  31. Hampshire, S. 1959. Thought and action. London: Chatto and Windus.Google Scholar
  32. Hertsgaard, M. 2016. Whistle blower, beware. New York Times.Google Scholar
  33. Hochschild, A. 2016. Our awful prisons: How they can be changed. New York Review of Books 63 (9): 30–32.Google Scholar
  34. Kahn, C. 2002. Plato and the Socratic dialogue: The philosophical use of a literary form. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Kozol, J. 1991. Savage inequalities: Children in American schools. New York: Broadway.Google Scholar
  36. Miller, J.G. 1998. Last one over the wall: The Massachusetts experiment in closing reform schools. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Nagel, T. 1970. The possibility of altruism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Nietzsche, F. 2003. The Genealogy of Morals. Trans. H.B. Samuel. Mineola: Dover Thrift Editions.Google Scholar
  39. Penner, T. 1987. The ascent from nominalism. Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. ———. 1988. Socrates on the impossibility of belief-relative sciences. In Proceedings of the Boston area colloquium in ancient philosophy, vol. 3, 263–325. Washington, DC: University Press of America. Retrieved from https://philpapers.org/s/Terry%20Penner.
  41. ———. 1991. Desire and power in Socrates: The argument of Gorgias 466a-468e that orators and tyrants have no power in the city. Apeiron 24: 147–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. ———. 1992. Socrates and the early dialogues. In The Cambridge companion to Socrates, ed. R. Kraut, 121–169. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  43. ———. 1996. Knowledge vs. true belief in the Socratic psychology of action. Apeiron 29: 199–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. ———. 1997. Socrates on the strength of knowledge: Protagoras 351B-357E. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 79 (2): 117–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. ———. 2000. Socrates. In Cambridge history of ancient political thought, ed. C.J. Rowe and M. Schofield, 164–189. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  46. ———. 2004. Towards a prudential reading of the Crito. In Socrates: 2400 years since his death: International symposium proceedings, ed. V. Karamanlis, 13–21. Delphi: European Cultural Center of Delphi.Google Scholar
  47. ———. 2005a. Platonic justice and what we mean by ‘justice’. Internet Journal of the International Plato Society 5: 1–76. Retrieved from https://philpapers.org/s/Terry%20Penner.Google Scholar
  48. ———. 2005b. Socratic ethics, ultra-realism, determinism, and ethical truth. In Virtue, norms, and objectivity: Issues in ancient and modern ethics, ed. C. Gill, 157–187. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
  49. ———. 2006. Forms and the sciences in Plato. In A companion to Plato, ed. H. Benson, 165–183. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  50. ———. 2007a. The death of the so-called ‘Socratic Elenchus’ (C.J. De Vogel Lecture). In Gorgias-Menon: Selected papers from the Seventh Symposium Platonicum, ed. M. Erler and L. Brisson, 3–19. Sankt Augustin: Academia Verlag.Google Scholar
  51. ———. 2007b. The good, advantage, happiness, and the form of the good: How continuous with Socratic ethics is Platonic ethics? In Pursuing the good: Ethics and metaphysics in Plato’s Republic, ed. D. Cairns, F.-G. Herrmann, and T. Penner, 96–123. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
  52. ———. 2011. Socratic ethics and the Socratic psychology of action: A philosophical framework. In Cambridge companion to Socrates, ed. D. Morrison, 260–292. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  53. ———. 2013. The wax tablet, logic and Protagoreanism. In The Platonic art of philosophy, ed. G. Boys-Stones, D. El Murr, and C.J. Gill, 186–220. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Penner, T., and A. Chu. 2017. Plato and the philosophers of language. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
  55. Penner, T., and C. Rowe. 1994. The desire for good: Is the Meno consistent with the Gorgias? Phronesis 39: 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. ———. 2005. Plato’s Lysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  57. Rawls, J. 1970. A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  58. Rorty, R. 1965. Mind-body identity, privacy, and categories. Review of Metaphysics 19: 24–54.Google Scholar
  59. Santas, G. 2002. Penner, Plato, and Sachs on justice and happiness. In Desire, identity and existence: Essays in honor of T. M. Penner, ed. N. Reshotko, 95–107. Kelowna: Academic Printing.Google Scholar
  60. Scanlon, T.M. 2000. What we owe to each other. Cambridge, MA: Belknap.Google Scholar
  61. Sidgwick, H. 1907. The methods of ethics. 7th ed. London: MacMillan.Google Scholar
  62. Vlastos, G. 1956. Introduction. In Plato’s Protagoras, ed. M. Ostwald, vii–xlviii. Indianapolis: Bobbs Merrill.Google Scholar
  63. ———. 1991. Socrates, ironist and moral philosopher. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Wegman, J. 2016. A federal judge’s model of forgiveness. New York Times.Google Scholar
  65. Western, B., and B. Pettit. 2010. Incarceration and social inequality. Daedalus 139 (3): 8–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Williams, B. 1993. Shame and necessity (Sather Classical Lectures). Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  67. Wittgenstein, L. 1953. Philosophical investigations. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  68. Zehr, H. 2005. Changing lenses: Restorative justice for our times. 3rd ed. Harrisonberg: Herald.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Wisconsin-MadisonMadisonUSA

Personalised recommendations