Advertisement

Plato on Equality and Democracy

  • Christopher J. RoweEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Philosophical Studies Series book series (PSSP, volume 132)

Abstract

Democracy is “an attractively anarchic and colourful regime, it seems, one that accords a sort of equality to equals and unequals alike” (Rep. VIII 558c2-4). The present essay raises three questions in particular. (1) What precisely is the criticism of democracy here? (2) What kind or kinds of equality and inequality matter for Plato? As all sides agree, he is interested in proportional equality more than he is in its arithmetical counterpart, so that true equality, for him, will always turn out to be a kind of (arithmetical) inequality. But (3) inequality in what? Plato undoubtedly thinks the good and wise deserve a greater share in power just because they are good and wise; does he also think, as some have claimed, that the wealthy also deserve a greater share just because they are wealthy? The answer proposed to this last question in the following essay is a clear no: even if Plato holds wealth to be a good of some sort, the possession of an unequal share of it—despite what may be suggested, prima facie, by the presence of property classes in the Laws—is not, and is not even a part of, the reason for giving the wealthy an unequal share of power. The final proposal offered by this essay is that if goodness and wisdom are indeed for Plato the only good(s) actually relevant to the distribution of power, and if—as he seems to hold—true goodness and wisdom belong only to gods, then there will be a case for saying that, even for Plato, the supposed arch-enemy of democracy, democracy (in however limited a form) turns out to be the only possible outcome, whether under non-ideal or under ideal conditions.

Keywords

Constitutions Democracy Equality Ruling Wealth 

References

  1. Barrow, R. 1975. Plato, utilitarianism and education. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Bobonich, C., ed. 2010. Plato’s laws: A critical guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Cooper, J., ed. 1997. Plato: Complete works. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
  4. Hansen, M.H. 1991. The Athenian democracy in the age of Demosthenes. Norman: Oklahoma University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Kraut, R. 2010. Ordinary virtue from the Phaedo to the Laws. In Bobonich 2010, 51–70.Google Scholar
  6. Morrison, D.R. 2007. The utopian character of Plato’s ideal city. In The Cambridge companion to Plato’s Republic, ed. G.R.F. Ferrari, 232–255. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Popper, K. 2013. The open society and its enemies. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Rowe, C. 2007. Plato and the art of philosophical writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. ———. 2010a. The relationship of the Laws to other dialogues: a proposal. In Bobonich 2010, 29–50.Google Scholar
  10. ———. 2010b. Plato: The last days of Socrates. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  11. ———. 2011. The statesman and the best city. In Plato’s Statesman. Proceedings of the eighth symposium Platonicum Pragense, ed. A. Havliček, J. Jirsa, and K. Thein, 40–50. Prague: Oikoumene.Google Scholar
  12. ———. 2012a. Plato: Republic. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  13. ———. 2012b. Socrates in Plato’s Laws. In Presocratics and Plato: A Festschrift in honor of Charles H. Kahn, ed. V. Karasmanis and A. Hermann, 367–387. Las Vegas: Parmenides.Google Scholar
  14. ———. 2015. Plato: Theaetetus and Sophist, Cambridge texts in the history of philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  15. ———. 2016. The Athenians against the Persians: Plato’s view (Laws III.699b-d). In Defining Platonism: Essays in honor of the 75th birthday of John M. Dillon, ed. J.F. Finamore and S.K. Wear, 64–81. Steubenville: Franciscan University Press.Google Scholar
  16. ———. 2017. The ‘city of pigs’: A key passage in Plato’s Republic. Philosophie Antique no. 17 (Platon et la politique), 55–71.Google Scholar
  17. ———. forthcoming. The four republics. In The three republics: Plato, Diogenes, Zeno, ed. S. Husson and I. Koch. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
  18. Santas, G. 2010. Understanding Plato’s Republic. Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Schofield, M. 2010. The Laws’ two projects. In Bobonich 2010, 12–28.Google Scholar
  20. Sheffield, F. forthcoming. Reading Arendt with the Greek philosophers.Google Scholar
  21. Vlastos, G. 1981. Platonic studies. 2nd ed. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Wallach, J.R. 2001. Plato’s political art: A study of critical reason and democracy. University Park: Pennsylvania University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Durham UniversityDurhamUK

Personalised recommendations