Skip to main content

Systems Dynamics Applied to the Analysis of Risk at an Industrial Installation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Safety Dynamics

Abstract

This chapter presents a framework for the implementation of the dynamic modelling of systems to support risk management at an industrial facility. This approach, implemented using the STELLA® software package, provides the decision maker with a way to model a system and simulate its behaviour over time. It takes a dynamic approach to the analysis of industrial risks, based on four complementary stages that facilitate detailed analyses and the continuous improvement of risk management (Fig. 2.1):

  • Design of the dynamic model and simulation of system behaviour: This stage involves: identifying the variables that describe the state of continuously interacting system components; defining hypotheses that establish the interactions with a view to formalizing the proposed system; developing a model of causal relationships between variables; formulating these relationships as differential equations; and implementing them in software (Forrester 1961; Donnadieu and Karsky 2002).

  • Comprehensive failure analysis: This stage uses a classical risk analysis method, HAZOP (Andrews and Moss 2002). This method is used to try to identify all potential failures. Using the dynamic model, potential changes in the system’s behaviour can be analysed.

  • Comprehensive simulation of the consequences of failures: This stage uses the PHAST® software package (see the DNV website) to simulate hazardous phenomena (toxic emissions, overpressure, thermal flows, etc.) and assess their potential consequences.

  • Testing of prevention and protection methods: This stage consists of assessing the effectiveness of prevention, protection and backup measures. It makes it possible to define new measures, if necessary. The model can then be re-developed based on the assumption that the identified prevention and protection measures have been implemented (Garbolino et al. 2009).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    ppm = Part per million: One unit of a substance contained in a million units of another substance.

References

  • Andrews JD, Moss TR (2002) Reliability and risk assessment. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Aracil J (1984) Introduction à la dynamique des systèmes. PUL, Collection Science des systèmes, 412 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Deaton ML, Winebrake JJ (2000) Dynamic modeling of environnemental systems, coll, Modeling dynamic systems, Springer, New York, 194 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Donnadieu G, Karsky M (2002) La systémique, penser et agir dans la complexité. Editions Liaisons, Paris, 269 p

    Google Scholar 

  • EuroChlor (2005) Guideline for site security of chlorine production facilities. GEST 05/316, 11 p

    Google Scholar 

  • EuroChlor (2008) The chlorine reference manual. GEST 06/317, 62 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Forrester JW (1961) Industrial dynamics. MIT Press, Cambridge, p 464

    Google Scholar 

  • Garbolino E, Guarnieri F, Cambon J (2005) Can the nuclear safety concept “Defense In Depth” improve the security of industrial and technological activities in France? Chem Eng Trans 6:533–538

    Google Scholar 

  • Garbolino E, Chery JP, Guarnieri F (2009) Dynamic systems modelling to improve risk analysis in the context of seveso industries. Chem Eng Trans 17:373–378

    Google Scholar 

  • INERIS (2004) Application de la classification des substances et préparations dangereuses à la nomenclature des installations classées, 29 p

    Google Scholar 

  • INERIS (2008) Émissions accidentelles de substances chimiques dangereuses dans l’atmosphère. Seuils de toxicité aigüe du Chlore. DRC-08-94398-10645A, 3 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Kjellen U (2000) Prevention of accidents through experience feedback. CRC Press, London, 424 p

    Google Scholar 

  • MEDAD (2007) Nomenclature des Installations Classées. Liste des activités soumises à la TGAP. Direction de la Prévention des Pollutions et des Risques. Service de l’Environnement Industriel, 76 p

    Google Scholar 

  • MEDD, DPPR, SEI, BARPI (2004) Accidentologie du chlore, 65 p

    Google Scholar 

  • NIOSH (2007) NIOSH pocket guide to chemical hazards. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health Education and Information Division, 424 p

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emmanuel Garbolino .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Garbolino, E., Chéry, JP., Guarnieri, F. (2019). Systems Dynamics Applied to the Analysis of Risk at an Industrial Installation. In: Guarnieri, F., Garbolino, E. (eds) Safety Dynamics. Advanced Sciences and Technologies for Security Applications. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96259-7_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96259-7_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-96258-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-96259-7

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics