Skip to main content

Bros v. Hos: Postfeminism, Anti-feminism and the Toxic Turn in Digital Gender Politics

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Gender Hate Online

Abstract

In recent years, digital media have facilitated a revival of feminist ideas and campaigns, as well as a virulent and especially toxic new strand of anti-feminism. The new anti-feminism has been attributed to a number of factors, including the technological affordances of social media, the changing socio-cultural realities of men’s lives and the affective potency of a new “cultural politics of emotion” (Ahmed 2013). While acknowledging the validity of these explanations, this chapter argues that the role of postfeminism has been largely overlooked, both in the rise of men’s rights activists and in the shaping of digital gender politics more generally. I contend that the dominance of a postfeminist cultural sensibility in Western society for the past decade or more has functioned as a logical precursor to the emergence and shaping of toxic masculinity politics. This, in turn, has provoked feminist responses that, while often impressive and sometimes effective, are also potentially constrained by the mutually synergetic dynamics of individualism, neoliberal capitalism and the algorithmic politics of social media. In 2015, Rachel O’Neill asked, “Can the logic of postfeminism be mobilized by men to (re)secure male power and privilege?” This chapter responds to O’Neill’s question, using digital men’s rights to demonstrate how this is happening.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See, for example, Scottish MP Mhari Black http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/snp-mp-online-abuse-mhairi-black-sexist-homophobic-women-parliament-debate-a8245646.html.

  2. 2.

    The term “mancession” was coined by Mark Perry, an economist from the University of Michigan, and began appearing in US newspapers during the financial crisis of 2008–2009.

  3. 3.

    https://www.propublica.org/article/facebook-hate-speech-censorship-internal-documents-algorithms.

  4. 4.

    “Is social media doing social harm?: Meredith L Patterson and Deanna Zandt go head to head”. New Internationalist. 1 November 2015.

  5. 5.

    The suitcase has become a powerful protest image—both on- and offline—highlighting the fact that Irish women must travel to access abortions. For example, in December 2016, the London Irish Abortion Rights Campaign (London Irish ARC) launched an online campaign asking people travelling home to Ireland for Christmas to tweet their support for Repeal with a picture of their suitcase (NicGhabhann 2018).

References

  • Ahmed, S. (2013). The Cultural Politics of Emotion. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrejevic, M. (2013). Infoglut: How Too Much Information Is Changing the Way We Think and Know. New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, W. L., & Segerberg, A. (2012). The Logic of Connective Action: Digital Media and the Personalization of Contentious Politics. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 739–768.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bly, R. (1992). Iron John. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bumiller, K. (2013). Feminist Collaboration with the State in Response to Sexual Violence: Lessons from the American Experience. In A. M. Tripp, M. Marx Ferree, & C. Ewing (Eds.), Gender, Violence, and Human Security: Critical Feminist Perspectives (pp. 191–213). New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgess, J. (2006). Hearing Ordinary Voices: Cultural Studies, Vernacular Creativity and Digital Storytelling. Continuum, 20(2), 201–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burgess, J., & Matamoros-Fernández, A. (2016). Mapping Sociocultural Controversies Across Digital Media Platforms: One Week of# Gamergate on Twitter, YouTube, and Tumblr. Communication Research and Practice, 2(1), 79–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dean, J. (2007). Feminism, Communicative Capitalism, and the Inadequacies of Radical Democracy. In Radical Democracy and the Internet (pp. 226–245). London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Easter, B. (2018). “Feminist_Brevity_in_Light_of_Masculine_Long-Windedness:” Code, Space, and Online Misogyny. Feminist Media Studies, 18(4), 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, A., & Riley, S. (2015). Technologies of Sexiness: Sex, Identity, and Consumer Culture. Sexuality, Identity, and Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • García-Favaro, L., & Gill, R. (2016). “Emasculation Nation has Arrived”: Sexism Rearticulated in Online Responses to Lose the Lads’ Mags Campaign. Feminist Media Studies, 16(3), 379–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerbaudo, P. (2012). Tweets and the Streets: Social Media and Contemporary Activism. London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill, R. (2007). Postfeminist Media Culture: Elements of a Sensibility. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 10(2), 147–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gill, R. (2008). Empowerment/Sexism: Figuring Female Sexual Agency in Contemporary Advertising. Feminism & Psychology, 18(1), 35–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gill, R. (2016). Post-Postfeminism?: New Feminist Visibilities in Postfeminist Times, Feminist. Media Studies, 16(4), 610–630.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill, R. (2017). The Affective, Cultural and Psychic Life of Postfeminism: 10 Years On. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 20(6), 606–626.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gill, R., & Scharff, C. (2013). New Femininities: Postfeminism, Neoliberalism and Subjectivity. London: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ging, D. (2009). All-Consuming Images: New Gender Formations in Post-Celtic-Tiger Ireland. In D. Ging, M. Cronin, & P. Kirby (Eds.), Transforming Ireland: Challenges, Critiques, Resources. Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ging, D. (2017). Alphas, Betas, and Incels: Theorizing the Masculinities of the Manosphere. Men and Masculinities, p. 1097184X17706401.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ging, D. (2018). Neologising Misogyny: Urban Dictionary’s Folksonomy of Sexual Abuse. Paper presented at Console-ing Passions, Bournemouth University, 12th July.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haywood, C., & Mac an Ghaill, M. (2003). Men and Masculinities: Theory, Research and Social Practice (p. 134). Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hearn, J. (1993). The Politics of Essentialism and the Analysis of the ‘Men’s Movement (s)’. Feminism & Psychology, 3(3), 405–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jane, E. A. (2016). Online Misogyny and Feminist Digilantism. Continuum, 30(3), 284–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jane, E. A. (2018). Gendered Cyberhate as Workplace Harassment and Economic Vandalism. Feminist Media Studies, 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeong, S. (2015). The Internet of Garbage. New York: Forbes Media.

    Google Scholar 

  • Juris, J. S. (2012). Reflections on# Occupy Everywhere: Social Media, Public Space, and Emerging Logics of Aggregation. American Ethnologist, 39(2), 259–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marwick, A. (2013, March 29). Donglegate: Why the Tech Community Hates Feminists. Wired. com, p. 29. Retrieved from https://www.wired.com/2013/03/richards-affair-and-misogyny-in-tech/.

  • Massanari, A. (2015). #Gamergate and The Fappening: How Reddit’s Algorithm, Governance, and Culture Support Toxic Technocultures. New Media and Society, 19, 329–346. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444815608807.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Massanari, A. L. (2018). Rethinking Research Ethics, Power, and the Risk of Visibility in the Era of the “Alt-right” Gaze. Social Media + Society, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305118768302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Massanari, A. L., & Chess, S. (2018). Attack of the 50-Foot Social Justice Warrior: The Discursive Construction of SJW Memes as the Monstrous Feminine. Feminist Media Studies, 18(4), 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McRobbie, A. (2004). Post-Feminism and Popular Culture. Feminist Media Studies, 4(3), 255–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Messner, M. A. (1998). The Limits of ‘The Male Sex Role’ An Analysis of the Men’s Liberation and Men’s Rights Movements’ Discourse. Gender & Society, 12(3), 255–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Messner, M. A. (2016). Forks in the Road of Men’s Gender Politics: Men’s Rights vs Feminist Allies. International Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy, 5(2), 6–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Messner, M. A., & Montez de Oca, J. (2005). The Male Consumer as Loser: Beer and Liquor Ads in Mega Sports Media Events. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 30(3), 1879–1909.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nadesan, M. H. (2002). Engineering the Entrepreneurial Infant: Brain Science, Infant Development Toys, and Governmentality. Cultural Studies, 16(3), 401–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagle, A. (2015). An Investigation Into Contemporary Online Anti-Feminist Movements. PhD Thesis, Dublin City University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagle, A. (2016). The New Man of 4chan. The Baffler, 30, 64–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagle, A. (2017). Kill All Normies: Online Culture Wars from 4chan and Tumblr to Trump and the Alt-Right. Alresford: John Hunt Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • NicGhabhann, N. (2018). City Walls, Bathroom Stalls and Tweeting the Taoiseach: The Aesthetics of Protest and the Campaign for Abortion Rights in the Republic of Ireland. Continuum. https://doi.org/10.1080/10304312.2018.1468413.

  • O’Neill, R. (2015a). Whither Critical Masculinity Studies? Notes on Inclusive Masculinity Theory, Postfeminism, and Sexual Politics. Men and Masculinities, 18(1), 100–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill, R. (2015b). The Work of Seduction: Intimacy and Subjectivity in the London ‘Seduction Community’. Sociological Research Online, 20(4), 5. Retrieved from http://www.socresonline.org.uk/20/4/5.html.

  • Paasonen, S. (2015). A Midsummer’s Bonfire: AFFECTIVE Intensities of Online Debate. In K. Hillis, S. Paasonen, & M. Petit (Eds.), Networked Affect (pp. 27–42). Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papacharissi, Z. (2015). Affective Publics: Sentiment, Technology, and Politics (p. 2015). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ringrose, J., & Lawrence, E. (2018). Remixing Misandry, Manspreading, and Dick Pics: Networked Feminist Humour on Tumblr. Feminist Media Studies, 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siapera, E., & Viejo-Otera, P. (2015). How Do Far-Right Movements and Parties Use the Internet and the Social Media? Digital Facebook Postcards, With Hate, Your Far Right. ISIS Summit Vienna 2015—The Information Society at the Crossroads. https://doi.org/10.3390/isis-summit-vienna-2015-S3007.

  • Silva, J. M. (2013). Coming Up Short. New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tasker, Y., & Negra, D. (Eds.). (2007). Interrogating Postfeminism: Gender and the Politics of Popular Culture. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walter, N. (2011). Living Dolls: The Return of Sexism. London: Hachette.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Debbie Ging .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ging, D. (2019). Bros v. Hos: Postfeminism, Anti-feminism and the Toxic Turn in Digital Gender Politics. In: Ging, D., Siapera, E. (eds) Gender Hate Online. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96226-9_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics