Abstract
At the University of Hull, we have run open-ended laboratory classes using groups of four students for a number of years in order to develop a range of skills around the design and execution of a practical investigation. When this form of experimental problem solving was first implemented, the groups performed two separate experiments lasting 4 weeks each in which they were challenged to measure some quantity using only very basic equipment. Some of these experiments have already been described at a previous GIREP meeting. In recent years the experiment has developed from two separate experiments into a single experiment conducted in two stages. For historical reasons, the practical use of operational amplifiers was incorporated into the experiments and the students were set a task to build a circuit to amplify the signal from a type K thermocouple and then use the thermocouple to measure the heat capacity of an aluminium alloy of unknown composition. This experiment has been running now for several years and has proven highly effective in challenging students to think and use their knowledge. No instructions are given: the students have to design and execute their own experiment and record everything in a Wiki which is assessed at the end of the experiment.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Akerlind, G., McKenzie, J., Lupton, M.: A threshold concepts focus to curriculum design: supporting student learning through application of variation theory. Office for Learning and Teaching, Sydney (2011). http://eprints.qut.edu.au/69603/. Accessed 12 June 2018
Heller, P., Hollabaugh, M.: Teaching problem solving through cooperative grouping. Part 2: Designing problems and structuring groups. American Journal of Physics, 60 (7), 637-644 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1119/1.17118
Heller, P, Keith, P. Anderson, S.: Teaching problem solving through cooperative grouping Part 1: Group versus individual problem solving. American Journal of Physics, 60 (7), 627-636 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1119/1.17117
Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., Clark, R. E.: Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of Constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75–86 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4102_1
QAA. Physics, astronomy and astrophysics 2008. http://www.qaa.ac.uk/en/Publications/Documents/Subject-benchmark-statement-Physics-astronomy-and-astrophysics.pdf (2008). Accessed 12 June 2018
Sands, D, Potter, N and Overton, T.: Group Discussion And Reflection As A Method Of Developing Physics Students’ Problem Solving Skills. In: GIREP 2008 Conference, Physics Curriculum Design, Development and Validation, Nicosia, Cyprus, 18-22 August 2008
Zwickl, B. M., Finkelstein, N., & Lewandowski, H. J.: The process of transforming an advanced lab course: Goals, curriculum, and assessments. American Journal of Physics, 81(1), 63–70 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1119/1.4768890
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sands, D. (2018). The Value of Solving Experimental Problems in Groups. In: Sokołowska, D., Michelini, M. (eds) The Role of Laboratory Work in Improving Physics Teaching and Learning. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96184-2_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96184-2_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-96183-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-96184-2
eBook Packages: Physics and AstronomyPhysics and Astronomy (R0)