Skip to main content

Preemptively Guessing the Center

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Combinatorial Optimization (ISCO 2018)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 10856))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 822 Accesses

Abstract

An online algorithm is typically unaware of the length of the input request sequence that it is called upon. Consequently, it cannot determine whether it has already processed most of its input or whether the bulk of work is still ahead.

In this paper, we are interested in whether some sort of orientation within the request sequence is nevertheless possible. Our objective is to preemptively guess the center of a request sequence of unknown length n: While processing the input, the online algorithm maintains a guess for the central position and is only allowed to update its guess to the position of the current element under investigation. We show that there is a randomized algorithm that in expectation places the guess at a distance of 0.172n from the central position , and we prove that this is best possible. We also give upper and lower bounds for a natural extension to weighted sequences.

This problem has an application to preemptively partitioning integer sequences and is connected to the online bidding problem.

C. Konrad is supported by the Centre for Discrete Mathematics and its Applications (DIMAP) at Warwick University and by EPSRC award EP/N011163/1. T. Tonoyan is supported by grants no. 152679-05 and 174484-05 from the Icelandic Research Fund.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    An exception are online algorithms with advice, where the online algorithm receives additional input bits prior to the processing of the request sequence. These bits can be used to encode the input length. See [1] for a recent survey.

References

  1. Boyar, J., Favrholdt, L.M., Kudahl, C., Larsen, K.S., Mikkelsen, J.W.: Online algorithms with advice: a survey. SIGACT News 47(3), 93–129 (2016)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Karlin, A.R., Manasse, M.S., Rudolph, L., Sleator, D.D.: Competitive snoopy caching. Algorithmica 3(1), 79–119 (1988)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Chrobak, M., Kenyon-Mathieu, C.: Sigact news online algorithms column 10: competitiveness via doubling. SIGACT News 37(4), 115–126 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Yao, A.C.C.: Probabilistic computations: toward a unified measure of complexity. In: Proceedings of the 18th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, SFCS 1977, Washington, DC, USA, pp. 222–227. IEEE Computer Society (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chrobak, M., Kenyon, C., Noga, J., Young, N.E.: Oblivious medians via online bidding. In: Correa, J.R., Hevia, A., Kiwi, M. (eds.) LATIN 2006. LNCS, vol. 3887, pp. 311–322. Springer, Heidelberg (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/11682462_31

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Bokhari, S.H.: Partitioning problems in parallel, pipeline, and distributed computing. IEEE Trans. Comput. 37(1), 48–57 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hansen, P., Lih, K.W.: Improved algorithms for partitioning problems in parallel, pipelined, and distributed computing. IEEE Trans. Comput. 41, 769–771 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Khanna, S., Muthukrishnan, S., Skiena, S.: Efficient array partitioning. In: Degano, P., Gorrieri, R., Marchetti-Spaccamela, A. (eds.) ICALP 1997. LNCS, vol. 1256, pp. 616–626. Springer, Heidelberg (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-63165-8_216

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Miguet, S., Pierson, J.-M.: Heuristics for 1D rectilinear partitioning as a low cost and high quality answer to dynamic load balancing. In: Hertzberger, B., Sloot, P. (eds.) HPCN-Europe 1997. LNCS, vol. 1225, pp. 550–564. Springer, Heidelberg (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0031628

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Konrad, C.: Streaming partitioning of sequences and trees. In: 19th International Conference on Database Theory, ICDT 2016, Bordeaux, France, 15–18 March 2016, pp. 13:1–13:18 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Konrad, C., Tonoyan, T.: Preemptive online partitioning of sequences. CoRR abs/1702.06099 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christian Konrad .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Konrad, C., Tonoyan, T. (2018). Preemptively Guessing the Center. In: Lee, J., Rinaldi, G., Mahjoub, A. (eds) Combinatorial Optimization. ISCO 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10856. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96151-4_24

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96151-4_24

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-96150-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-96151-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics