Skip to main content

Quality of Care in Perioperative Medicine

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 919 Accesses

Abstract

Quality of care in anesthesiology is the result of progressive thinking by industrial quality management and pioneers of quality management in medicine. Prevention of catastrophic perioperative complications involves meticulous tracking of perioperative events. This includes continuous monitoring of perioperative events, collecting data, implementing changes, and noticing trends in the data that can help to prevent these events from occurring. This can occur through a targeted quality improvement program implementation. A robust quality improvement system identifies underperformance either by systems, individuals, or equipment and allows for interventions before complications occur.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Cooper JB, Gaba D. No myth: anesthesia is a model for addressing patient safety. Anesthesiology. 2002;97(6):1335–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Deming WE. Out of the crisis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bindman AB, Grumbach K, Keane D, Rauch L, Luce JM. Consequences of queuing for care at a public hospital emergency department. JAMA. 1991;266(8):1091–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Donabedian A. Evaluating the quality of medical care. Milbank Mem Fund Q. 1966;44(3):166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Stoelting RK, Khuri SF. Past accomplishments and future directions: risk prevention in anesthesia and surgery. Anesthesiol Clin. 2006;24(2):235–53. v.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hallinan JT. Heal thyself: once seen as risky, one group of doctors changes its ways. Wall St J. 2005;21:1.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Standards for basic anesthetic monitoring [Internet]. American Society of Anesthesiologists. Available from: www.asahq.org

  8. Leape LL. Reporting of adverse events. N Engl J Med. 2002;347(20):1633–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Milch CE, Salem DN, Pauker SG, Lundquist TG, Kumar S, Chen J. Voluntary electronic reporting of medical errors and adverse events. An analysis of 92,547 reports from 26 acute care hospitals. J Gen Intern Med. 2006;21(2):165–70.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Conceptual Framework for the international classification for patient safety [Internet]. WHO/IER/PSP. 2009. Available from: http://www.who.int/patientsafety/taxonomy/icps_full_report.pdf

  11. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. From the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Med J Aust. 2014;200(5):246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Jehring J, Heinrich HW. Industrial accident prevention: a scientific approach. Ind Labor Relat Rev. 1951;4(4):609.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Guffey PJ, Culwick M, Merry AF. Incident reporting at the local and national level. Int Anesthesiol Clin. 2014;52(1):69–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Percarpio KB, Vince Watts B, Weeks WB. The effectiveness of root cause analysis: what does the literature tell us? Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2008;34(7):391–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Reason J. Human error: models and management. BMJ. 2000;320(7237):768–70.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Pitblado R, Weijand P. Barrier diagram (bow tie) quality issues for operating managers. Process Saf Prog. 2014;33(4):355–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. ISMP. Medication errors reporting program. J Am Pharm Assoc. 2010;50(2):e70–1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Dutton RP. Why have a quality management program? Int Anesthesiol Clin. 2013;51(4):1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Dutton RP, Dukatz A. Quality improvement using automated data sources: the anesthesia quality institute. Anesthesiol Clin. 2011;29(3):439–54.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Rodrigues R, Trigg L, Schmidt AE, Leichsenring K. The public gets what the public wants: experiences of public reporting in long-term care in Europe. Health Policy. 2014;116(1):84–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Iezzoni LI. The risks of risk adjustment. JAMA. 1997;278(19):1600–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Eng, M.R., Khan, T., Farooq, R. (2019). Quality of Care in Perioperative Medicine. In: Fox, III, C., Cornett, E., Ghali, G. (eds) Catastrophic Perioperative Complications and Management. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96125-5_24

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96125-5_24

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-96124-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-96125-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics