Advertisement

Affective Appraisal of Hospital Reception Scenes

  • A. M. M. MacielEmail author
  • L. L. Costa FilhoEmail author
  • V. VillaroucoEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 818)

Abstract

This article describes an affective evaluation of hospital reception scenes and aims to identify dimensions that derive from environmental affection and the physical attributes which most influence this type of judgment. Two hospital reception scenes, typical of private hospitals in the region focused on in this research, one which was judged to have a relaxing quality and the other, exciting, were used as stimuli to collect data from 75 subjects, through a questionnaire, and whose responses were analyzed using graphics and frequency distribution tables. Findings confirm that the scene with relaxing quality raises the perceived affective quality, while the other, with an exciting quality, reduces it. It has also been found that color; furniture and size are the physical attributes which most influence these judgments.

Keywords

Hospital reception Perceived affective quality Ergonomics of the built environment 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We are grateful for the collaboration received from Gisele Silva, Elizabeth Arruda, Miquelina Gondola and Italo Cabral.

References

  1. Andrade C, Lima L, Pereira C, Fornara F, Bonaiuto M (2013) Inpatients’ and outpatients’ satisfaction: the mediating role of perceived quality or physical and social environment. Health Place 21:122–132.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2013.01.013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Becjker F, Douglas S (2008) The ecology of the patient visit. J Ambul Care Manag 31:128–141.  https://doi.org/10.1097/01.JAC.0000314703.34795.44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Berlyne DE (1972) Ends and meaning of experimental aesthetics. Can J Psychol 26:303–325.  https://doi.org/10.1037/h0082439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beukeboom C, Langeveld D, Tanja-Dijkstra K (2012) Stress-reducing effects of real and artificial nature in a hospital waiting room. J Altern Complement Med 18(4):329–333.  https://doi.org/10.1089/acm.2011-0488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Felippe ML (2014) Physical environment and environmental language in the affective stress restoration process in paediatric impatient rooms. PhD Thesis, University of FerraraGoogle Scholar
  6. Figueiredo E (2005) Ambientes de saúde – O hospital numa perspectiva ambiental terapêutica. In: Soczka L (ed) Contextos humanos e psicologia ambiental. Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian, Lisboa, pp 303–335Google Scholar
  7. Iida I (2005) Ergonomia: Projeto e Produção. Edgar Blucher, São PauloGoogle Scholar
  8. Kaplan S (1988) Perception and landscape: conceptions and misconceptions. In: Nasar JL (ed) Environmental aesthetics: theory, research, and application. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 45–55.  https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.2.2.153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Lawrence R (2002) Healthy residential environments. In: Bechtel R, Churchman A (eds) Handbook of environmental psychology. Wiley, New York, pp 394–412Google Scholar
  10. Maciel AMM, Costa Filho L, Villarouco V (2018) A Qualidade Calmante Percebida em Cenas de Recepções Hospitalares, pp 798–807. In: Blucher, São Paulo. ISSN 2318-6968,  https://doi.org/10.5151/eneac2018-058
  11. Marconi MA, Lakatos EM (2003) Fundamentos de metodologia, 5th edn. Atlas, São PauloGoogle Scholar
  12. Nasar JL (1988) The effect of sign complexity and coherence on the perceived quality of retail scenes. In: Nasar JL (ed) Environmental aesthetics: theory, research, and application. Cambridge University Press, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Nasar JL (2000) The evaluative image of places. In: Walsh WB, Craik KH, Prince RH (eds) Person-environment psychology: new directions and perspectives, 2nd edn. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, pp 117–168Google Scholar
  14. Nasar JL (2008) Visual quality by design. Haworth Inc, HollandGoogle Scholar
  15. Russel J (1988) Affective appraisals of environments. In: Nasar JL (ed) Environmental aesthetics: theory, research, and application. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 120–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Stamps AE (1992) Perceptual and preferential effects of photomontage simulations of environments: In: Perceptual and motor skills, nº 74.  https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1992.74.3.675
  17. Ulrich R, Zimring C, Zhu X (2008) A review of the research literature on evidence-based healthcare design. Health Environ Des J 1:61–125.  https://doi.org/10.1177/193758670800100306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Villarouco V (2011) Tratando de ambientes ergonomicamente adequados: seriam ergoambientes? In: Mont’Alvão C, Villarouco V (eds) Um novo olhar sobre o projeto: A Ergonomia do Ambiente Construído. Teresópolis: 2AB, pp 25–46Google Scholar
  19. Ward L, Russel J (1981) Cognitive set and the perception of place. Environ Behav 13(5):219–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Wohlwill J (1976) Environmental aesthetics: the environment as a source of affect. In: Altmann I, Wohlwill J (eds) Human behavior and environment, vol 1, pp 37–86 Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.PPGDesignUniversidade Federal de PernambucoRecifeBrazil
  2. 2.PPGDesign/PPErgoUniversidade Federal de PernambucoRecifeBrazil

Personalised recommendations